The (non-)use of ex post legislative evaluations by the European Commission

References

• Arcadia International, Van Dijk Management Consultants, Civic Consulting and Agra CEAS (2008) Evaluation of the Community Acquis on the Marketing of Seed and Plant Propagating Material (S&PM), Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• BEUC (2016) ‘ Strengthening enforcement’, available at http://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2016-087_ama_strengthening_enforcement.pdf (accessed 16 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Böhling, K. (2014) ‘Sidelined member states: commission learning from experts in the face of comitology’, Journal of European Integration 36(2): 117–34. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2013.818992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2008) ‘The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 471–88. doi: 10.1080/13501760801996634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2013) ‘Issues, preferences and ties: determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 552–70. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.726467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contandriopoulos, D. and Brousselle, A. (2012) ‘Evaluation models and evaluation use’, Evaluation 18(1): 61–77. doi: 10.1177/1356389011430371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. and Leithwood, K. (1986) ‘Current empirical research on evaluation utilization’, Review of Educational Research 56(3): 331–64. doi: 10.3102/00346543056003331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Laat, B. and Williams, K. (2014) ‘Evaluation use within the European Commission: lessons for the Commissioner’, in M. Loud and L. Mayne (eds), Enhancing Evaluation Use: Insights from Internal Evaluation Units, London: Sage, pp. 147–74.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) ‘ European Union strategy for the protection and welfare of animals 2012–2015’, COM(2012)6.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013) ‘ Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and making available on the market of plant reproductive material (plant reproductive material law)’, COM(2013)262.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015) ‘ Better regulation toolbox’, SWD(2015)111.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) ‘ Better regulation: delivering better results for a stronger Union’, COM(2016)615.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. (2012) ‘Evaluating legislation: an alternative approach for evaluating EU internal market and services law’, Evaluation 18(4): 477–99. doi: 10.1177/1356389012460439
   Google Scholar
• GHK and ADAS UK (2010) Evaluation of the EU Policy on Animal Welfare and Possible Policy Options for the Future, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2014) Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission, Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. and Mark, M. (2003) ‘Beyond use: understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions’, The American Journal of Evaluation 24(3): 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højlund, S. (2014) ‘Evaluation use in evaluation systems – the case of the European Commission’, Evaluation 20(4): 428–46. doi: 10.1177/1356389014550562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF GHK, Van Dijk Management and Civic Consulting (2012) (External) Evaluation of the Consumer Protection Cooperation Regulation EC/2006/2004, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IFOAM EU Group (2013) Towards More Crop Diversity – Adapting Market Rules for Future Food Security, Biodiversity and Food Culture, Brussels: online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. et al. (2009) ‘Research on evaluation use: a review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005’, American Journal of Evaluation 30(3): 377–410. doi: 10.1177/1098214009341660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J. (2014) A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change, Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, S. (2012) ‘Exploring the necessary conditions for evaluation use in program change’, American Journal of Evaluation 33(2): 159–78. doi: 10.1177/1098214011411573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. (2008) ‘Regulation, the regulatory state and European politics’, West European Politics 31(1–2): 280–301. doi: 10.1080/01402380701835074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E., van Voorst, S. and Meuwese, A. (2016) ‘Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta-evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1329–48. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1076874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2011) ‘Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. (2007) ‘Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 190–207. doi: 10.1080/13501760601122274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkuté, D. and Haverland, M. (2015) ‘How does the European Commission use scientific expertise? Results from a survey of scientific members of the Commission’s experts committees’, Comparative European Politics 13(4): 430–49. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulha, L. and Cousins, B. (1997) ‘Evaluation use: theory, research and practice since 1986’, Evaluation Practice 18(3): 195–208. doi: 10.1177/109821409701800302
   Google Scholar
• Swanborn, P. (2007) Evalueren. Het ontwerpen, begeleiden en evalueren van interventies: een methodische basis voor evaluatie-onderzoek (2nd edition), Amsterdam: Boom Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Torriti, J. (2010) ‘Impact assessment and the liberalization of the EU energy markets: evidence-based policy-making or policy-based evidence-making?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 1065–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1993) ‘Where politics and evaluation research meet’, American Journal of Evaluation 14(1): 93–106. doi: 10.1177/109821409301400119
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2010) ‘Political-bureaucratic accountability in the EU commission: modernising the executive’, West European Politics 33(5): 1093–116. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, P., van Voorst, S. and Mastenbroek, E. (2016) ‘Ex-post regulatory evaluation in the European Union: questioning the use of evaluation as instruments for accountability’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 82(4): 674–93. doi: 10.1177/0020852315598389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar