EU politicization and policy initiatives of the European Commission: the case of consumer policy

References

• Bartolini, S. (2006) ‘Mass politics in Brussels: how benign could it be?’ Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften 4(1): 28–56. doi: 10.1515/ZSE.2006.002
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. (2012) ‘Tolerant, if personal goals remain unharmed: explaining supranational bureaucrats’ attitudes to organizational change’, Governance 25(3): 485–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01572.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bes, B.J. (2017) ‘Under pressure! The institutional role conceptions of commission officials in an era of politicization’, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, VU Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2017) ‘From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1):83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 73–90. doi: 10.1080/135017697344244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (1998) ‘The European business interest and the nation state: large-firm lobbying in the European Union and member states’, Journal of Public Policy 18: 75–100. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X9800004X
   Google Scholar
• Cram, L. (1997) Policy-making in the European Union: Conceptual Lenses and the Integration Process, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cseres, K. (2005) Competition Law and Consumer Protection, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I.C.J.-R. (2016) ‘Pressure and expertise: explaining the information supply of interest groups in EU legislative lobbying’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54(3): 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. (2017) ‘Politicization and the public interest: when do the elites in Brussels address public interests in EU policy debates?’ European Union Politics 18(4): 603–19.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P. (2011) ‘No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration’, Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–75. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A. and Schmidtke, H. (2016) ‘Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance’, West European Politics 39(1): 3–22. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. and Monceau, N. (2009) ‘Are EU policies meeting Europeans’ expectations?’, in R. Dehousse, F. Deloche-Gaudez and S. Jacquot (eds), What is Europe up to? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Down, I. and Wilson, C. (2008) ‘From “permissive consensus” to “constraining dissensus”: a polarizing union?’ Acta Politica 43(1): 26–49. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2014) ‘Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1199–217. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. (1975) ‘Case study and theory in political science’, in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 79–138.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. and Segal, J. (2000) ‘Measuring issue salience’, American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83. doi: 10.2307/2669293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006) ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. (2007) The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guigner, S. (2004) ‘Institutionalizing public health in the European Commission: the thrills and spills of politicization’, in A. Smith (ed.), Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence Legitimacy. London: Routledge, pp. 96–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2014) Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2006) ‘Why the EU needs (left-right) politics? Policy reform and accountability are impossible without it’. Notre Europe, Policy Paper 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeglinger, D. (2016) ‘The politicisation of European integration in domestic election campaigns’, West European Politics 39(1): 44–63. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2003) ‘Europe divided?: Elites vs. public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 4(3): 281–304. doi: 10.1177/14651165030043002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (2016) Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janning, F. (2004) ‘Der Staat der Konsumenten. Plädoyer für eine politische Theorie des Verbraucherschutzes’, in R. Czada and R. Zint (eds), Politik und Markt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 151–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., et al. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-first Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2011) ‘The contextual nature of lobbying: explaining lobbying success in the European Union’, European Union Politics 12(4): 483–506. doi: 10.1177/1465116511413163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. (1970) Europe's Would-be Polity: Patterns of Change on the European Community, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. and Scheepers, P. (2005) ‘Political versus instrumental euro-scepticism: mapping scepticism in European countries and regions’, European Union Politics 6(2): 223–42. doi: 10.1177/1465116505051984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnette, P. (2001) ‘European governance and civic participation: can the European Union be politicised?’, Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance (Jean Monnet Working Paper 06/01), The Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law and Justice, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2002) ‘The European Commission: the limits of centralization and the perils of parliamentarization’, Governance 15(3): 375–92. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micklitz, H.W. and Weatherill, S. (1993) ‘Consumer policy in the European Community: before and after Maastricht’, Journal of Consumer Policy 16(3): 285–321. doi: 10.1007/BF01018759
   Google Scholar
• Micklitz, H., Reich, N. and Weatherill, S. (2004) ‘EU treaty revision and consumer protection’, Journal of Consumer Policy 27(4): 367–99. doi: 10.1007/s10603-004-3244-x
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In defence of the “democratic deficit”: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 603–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann, K. and Viehrig, H. (2011) Issue Salience in International Politics, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 572–90. doi: 10.1080/135017697344073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2016) A Responsive Technocracy? EU Politicisation and the Consumer Policies of the European Commission, Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. and Bödeker, S. (2016) ‘Internationale Organisationen in der deutschen Öffentlichkeit – ein Text Mining Ansatz’, in M. Lemke and G. Wiedemann (eds), Text-Mining in den Sozialwissenschaften. Grundlagen und Anwendungen zwischen qualitativer und quantitativer Diskursanalyse, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. and Zürn, M. (2014) ‘Zur Politisierung der EU in der Krise’, in M. Heidenreich (ed.), Krise der europäischen Vergesellschaftung? Soziologische Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 121–45.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a “social market economy”’. Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014) ‘European integration in the Euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism’, Journal of European Integration 36(3): 321–37. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2014.886399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, P. and Trenz, H.-J. (2012) The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbull, G. (2006) Consumer Capitalism: Politics, Product Markets, and Firm Strategy in France and Germany, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (2000) ‘Legislative politics in the European Union’. European Union Politics 1(1): 9–36. doi: 10.1177/1465116500001001002
   Google Scholar
• Uba, K. and Uggla, F. (2011) ‘Protest actions against the European Union, 1992–2007’, West European Politics 34(2): 384–93. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.546581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherill, S. (2005) EU Consumer Law and Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Weßels, B. (2007) ‘Discontent and European identity: three types of euroscepticism’, Acta Politica 42(2–3): 287–306. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013) The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wratil, C. (2018) ‘Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: evidence from council negotiation positions’, European Union Politics 19(1): 52–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2006) ‘Zur Politisierung der Europäischen Union’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47(2): 242–51. doi: 10.1007/s11615-006-0038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2014) ‘The politicization of world politics and its effects: eight propositions’, European Political Science Review 6(1): 47–71. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., Binder, M. and Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012) ‘International authority and its politicization’, International Theory 4(1): 69–106. doi: 10.1017/S1752971912000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar