1,941
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Put in the spotlight or largely ignored? Emphasis on the Spitzenkandidaten by political parties in their online campaigns for European elections

&

References

  • Adams, J., Ezrow, L. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2014) ‘Do voters respond to party manifestos or to a wider information environment? An analysis of mass-elite linkages on European Integration’, American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 967–78.
  • Barberá, P., Piccirilli, M., Geisler, A. and van Atteveldt, W. (2017) ‘Package “Rfacebook”’, R package version 0.6 15.
  • Braun, D. and Popa, S.A. (2018) ‘This time was different? The salience of the Spitzenkandidaten system among European parties’, West European Politics. doi: 1080/01402382.2017.1419003.
  • Corbett, R. (2014) ‘“European elections are second-order elections”: is received wisdom Changing’, Journal of Common Market Studies 52(6): 1194–8.
  • Dalton, R.J., Farrell, D.M. and McAllister, I. (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • De Sio, L. and Weber, T. (2014) ‘Issue yield: a model of party strategy in multidimensional Space’, American Political Science Review 108(4): 870–85.
  • Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W.C. and Winkler, A.K. (2014) ‘How parties compete for votes: a test of saliency theory’, European Journal of Political Research 53(1): 57–76.
  • Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. and Büchel, F. (2017) ‘Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology’, Information, Communication & Society 20(8): 1109–26.
  • Enli, G.S. and Skogerbø, E. (2013) ‘Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics’, Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 757–74.
  • Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006) ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–62.
  • Franklin, M. (2014) ‘Why vote at an election with no apparent purpose? Voter turnout at elections to the European Parliament’, European Policy Analysis 4: 1–12.
  • Gattermann, K., De Vreese, C.H. and Van der Brug, W. (2016) ‘Evaluations of the Spitzenkandidaten: the role of information and news exposure in citizens’ preference Formation’, Politics and Governance 4(1): 37–54.
  • Gibson, R.K. (2015) ‘Party change, social media and the rise of “citizen-initiated” campaigning’, Party Politics 21(2): 183–97.
  • Golder, S.N., Lago, I., Blais, A., Gidengil, E. and Gschwend, T. (2017) Multi-level Electoral Politics: Beyond the Second-order Election Model, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. and Mortensen, P.B. (2010) ‘Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting’, European Journal of Political Research 49(2): 257–81.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. and Mortensen, P.B. (2015) ‘Avoidance and engagement: issue competition in multiparty Systems’, Political Studies 63(4): 747–64.
  • Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, Houndmills: Macmillan.
  • Hix, S. and Marsh, M. (2011) ‘Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: an analysis of European parliament elections across time’, Electoral Studies 30(1): 4–15.
  • Hobolt, S. (2014) ‘A vote for the president? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European parliament elections’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1528–40.
  • Hobolt, S.B. and de Vries, C.E. (2015) ‘Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies 48(9): 1159–85.
  • Hoeglinger, D. (2016) ‘The politicisation of European integration in domestic election campaigns’, West European Politics 39(1): 44–63.
  • Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (eds) (2016) Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jungherr, A. (2016) ‘Twitter use in election campaigns: a systematic literature review’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 72–91.
  • Kriesi, H. (2012) ‘Personalization of national election campaigns’, Party Politics 18(6): 825–44.
  • Ladrech, R. (2015) ‘Europeanization of national politics: the centrality of political parties’, in J.M. Magone (ed.), Routledge Handbook of European Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 574–89.
  • Laffan, B. (2016) ‘Europe’s union in crisis: tested and contested’, West European Politics 39(5): 915–32.
  • Lilleker, D.G., et al. (2011) ‘Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: searching for a European model of web campaigning’, European Journal of Communication 26(3): 195–213.
  • Maier, J., et al. (2017) ‘This time it’s different? Effects of the Eurovision debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy – evidence from a quasi-experiment in 24 countries’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(4): 606–29.
  • Meyer, T.M. and Wagner, M. (2016) ‘Issue engagement in election campaigns the impact of electoral incentives and organizational Constraints’, Political Science Research and Methods 4(3): 555–71.
  • Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S.A., Parnet, O. and Benoit, K. (2016) ‘Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament’, Electoral Studies 44: 429–44.
  • Oelsner, K. and Heimrich, L. (2015) ‘Social media use of German politicians: towards dialogic voter relations?’ German Politics 24(4): 451–68.
  • Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Polk, J., et al. (2017) ‘Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 chapel hill expert survey data’, Research & Politics 4(1): 1–9.
  • Popa, S.A., Rohrschneider, R. and Schmitt, H. (2016) ‘Polarizing without legitimizing: the effect of lead candidates’ campaigns on perceptions of the EU democracy’, Electoral Studies 44: 469–82.
  • Priestley, J., Schollgen, G. and Peñalver García, N. (eds.) (2015) The Making of a European President. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Reif, K. (1984) ‘National electoral cycles and European elections 1979 and 1984’, Electoral Studies 3(3): 244–55.
  • Reif, K. and Schmitt, H. (1980) ‘Nine second-order national elections – a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election Results’, European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 3–44.
  • Rodriguez, J.L. and Madariaga, A.G. (2016) ‘Going public against institutional constraints? Analyzing the online presence intensity of 2014 European parliament election candidates’, European Union Politics 17(2): 303–23.
  • Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S. and Popa, S.A. (2015a) ‘Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European parliament elections’, European Union Politics 16(3): 347–68.
  • Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S.B., Popa, S.A. and Teperoglou, E. (2015b) ‘European parliament election study 2014, voter study’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 1(0).
  • Schmitt, H. and Toygür, I. (2016) ‘European parliament elections of May 2014: driven by national politics or EU policy making?’ Politics and Governance 4(1): 167–81.
  • Schulze, H. (2016) ‘The Spitzenkandidaten in the European parliament election campaign coverage 2014 in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom’, Politics & Governance 4(1): 23–36.
  • Sigelman, L. and Buell, E.H. (2004) ‘Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960–2000’, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 650–61.
  • Spoon, J.-J. and Klüver, H. (2014) ‘Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness’, Electoral Studies 35: 48–60.
  • Steenbergen, M.R. and Scott, D.J. (2004) ‘Contesting Europe? The salience of European integration as a party issue’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–92.
  • Treib, O. (2014) ‘The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1541–54.
  • Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. and Stanyer, J. (2011) ‘The personalization of mediated political communication: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings’, Journalism 13(2): 203–20.
  • Van der Eijk, C. and Schmitt, H. (2008) ‘Multi-level electoral systems’, Connex Report Series No. 4, Mannheim: University of Mannheim.
  • Vergeer, M., Hermans, L. and Sams, S. (2013) ‘Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: the exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style’, Party Politics 19(3): 477–501.
  • Wagner, M. and Meyer, T.M. (2014) ‘Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty Systems’, West European Politics 37(5): 1019–45.
  • Walter, A.S. and Vliegenthart, R. (2010) ‘Negative campaigning across different communication channels: different ball games?’ International Journal of Press/Politics 15(4): 441–61.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.