Failing on the social dimension: judicial law-making and student mobility in the EU

References

• Beck, G. (2012) The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU, Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. and Schmidt, S.K. (2017) ‘Free movement, the welfare state, and the European Union’s over-constitutionalization: administrating contradictions’, Public Administration 95(2): 437–49. doi: 10.1111/padm.12313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., et al. (2018) ‘ECJ judges read the morning papers: explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R. and Trampusch, C. (2011) ‘Review article: comparative political science and the study of education’, British Journal of Political Science 41(2): 413–43. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A. and Tarrow, S. (2009) ‘Polanyi in Brussels: supranational institutions and the transnational embedding of markets’, International Organization 63(4): 593–620. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309990099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichowski, R.A. (2007) The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. (2002) Justice Contained. Law and Politics in the European Union, Ithaka: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, G. (2012) The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2016) ‘The European Union legislature as an agent of the European Court of Justice’, Journal of Common Market Studies 54(1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2018): ‘Has the court changed, or have the cases? The deservingness of litigants as an element in Court of Justice citizenship adjudication’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1488881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, F. (2013) ‘Who funds the mobile student? Shedding some light on the normative assumptions underlying EU free movement law’, Common Market Law Review 50(1): 203–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougan, M. (2005) ‘Fees, grants, loans and dole cheques: who covers the costs of migrant education within the EU?’, Common Market Law Review 42(4): 943–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) ‘Questions and answers on the revision of social security coordination rules’ 13 December, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-4302_en.htm (accessed 3 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Gideon, A. (2015) ‘The position of higher education institutions in a changing European context: an EU law perspective’, Journal of Common Market Studies 53(5): 1045–60. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogenboom, A. (2013) ‘Mobility of students and the financial sustainability of higher education systems in the EU: a union of harmony or irreconcilable differences?’, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 2013: 15–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Q.K.H., Oste, D. and Wächter, B. (2013) Portable State Grants and Loans: An Overview and Their Contribution to Outgoing Student Mobility, Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Leidenmühler, F. (2016) Quotenregelung für Studierende der Human- und Zahnmedizin auf dem europäischen Prüfstand, ÖGfE Policy Brief, 31, Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, W. (2017) ‘Boundaries of political community in Europe, the US, and Canada’, Journal of European Integration 39(5): 575–90. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1327526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. (2015) An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. and Rotger, G.P. (2017) ‘The fiscal impact of EU immigration on the tax-financed welfare state: testing the ‘welfare burden’ thesis’, European Union Politics 18(4): 620–39. doi: 10.1177/1465116517717340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. and Werner, B. (2018) ‘No welfare magnet – movement and benefits in Germany and Denmark compared’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österreichische Studienbeihilfenbehörde (2015) ‘Studienbeihilfe: Wer hat Anspruch?’, 11.07, available at https://www.stipendium.at/studienfoerderung/studienbeihilfe/wer-hat-anspruch/ (accessed 3 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. and Leibfried, S. (1995) ‘Multitiered institutions and the making of social policy’, in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson (eds.), European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhs, M. (2017) ‘Free movement in the European Union: national institutions vs common policies?’, International Migration, 55(S1): 22–38. doi: 10.1111/imig.12398
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2001) ‘Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe’, Scandinavian Political Studies 24(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’’, Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2018) The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process: The Shadow of Case Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrauwen, A. (2011) Access to and Portability of Student Grants and Loans: Where Targets Meet Free Movement Law, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. (2004) The Judicial Construction of Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strumia, F. and Brown, C. (2015) ‘The asymmetry in the right to free movement of European Union citizens: the case of students’, available at http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.de/2015/07/the-asymmetry-in-right-to-free-movement.html (accessed 4 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education (2010) ‘Mutatis mutandis? The Court of Justice of the European Union rules that member states may be allowed to impose non-resident student quotas’, available at https://www.ares-ac.be/fr/statistiques (accessed 3 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Thym, D. (2015) ‘The elusive limits of solidarity: residence rights of and social benefits for economically inactive union citizens’, Common Market Law Review 52(1): 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen, F. (2010) ‘The judiciary as legislator? How the European Court of Justice shapes policy-making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(8): 1128–46. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2010.513559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherill, S. (2012) Cases and Materials on EU Law, 10th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J.H.H. (1991) ‘The transformation of Europe’, The Yale Law Journal 100(1): 2402–83.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, B. (2017) ‘Das Europäische Freizügigkeitsregime als Herausforderung für die nationalen Sozialsysteme: Reaktionen des deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaates und die Folgen’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 58(4): 509–32. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2017-4-509
   Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, F. (2011) ‘A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration’, European Law Journal 17(1): 1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar