Trusting nudges? Lessons from an international survey

References

• Arad, A. and Rubinstein, A. (2018) ‘The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies’, Journal of Law and Economics ( forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arno, A. and Thomas, S. (2016) ‘The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, BMC Public Health 16: 676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3272-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. M., Shu, S. B. and Weber, E. U. (2018) ‘The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer, J. and Reisch, L.A. (2019) ‘Behavioural mechanisms and (un)healthy dietary choices. A review’, Journal of Consumer Policy forthcoming in 42(1). doi: 10.1007/s10603-018-9387-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S. (2012) Save More Tomorrow: Practical Behavioral Finance Solutions to Improve 401(k) Plans. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S. et al. (2017) ‘Should governments invest more in nudging?’ Psychological Science 28(8): 1041–55. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhawra, J. et al. (2018) ‘Are young Canadians supportive of proposed nutrition policies and regulations? An overview of policy support and the impact of socio-demographic factors on public opinion’, Canadian Journal of Public Health ( forthcoming). doi:10.17269/s41997-018-0066-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, C., Duffy, B., Perry, C. and Wellings, D. (2012) Acceptable Behavior? Public Opinion on Behavior Change Policy. Report on behalf of the Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Breman, A. (2011) ‘Give more tomorrow: two field experiments on altruism and intertemporal choice’ Journal of Public Economics 95(11): 1349–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986) ‘Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives’, Developmental Psychology 22(6): 723–42. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, T. (2015) ‘Alcohol and controlling risks through nudges’, The New Bioethics 21(1): 46–55. doi: 10.1179/2050287715Z.00000000064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L. and Rahali, B. (2018) ‘Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?’ Journal of Economic Psychology 65: 41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidai, S. and Shafir, E. (2018) ‘Are “nudges” getting a fair shot? joint versus separate evaluation’, Behavioural Public Policy ( forthcoming). doi:org/10.1017/bpp.2018.9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diepeveen, S., Ling, T., Suhrcke, M., Roland, M. and Marteau, T.M. (2013) ‘Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative analysis’, BMC Public Health 13: 756. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, Y. (2018) The Law of Good People: Challenging States’ Ability to Regulate Human Behavior. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felsen, G., Castelo, N. and Reiner, P. B. (2013) ‘Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges’, Judgement and Decision Making 8(3): 202–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A. and Vogl, D. (2013) ‘Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries’, Global Environmental Change 23(5): 1001–08. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D. and Tinghög, G. (2015) ‘Public views on policies involving nudges’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(3): 439–53. doi: 10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. (2015) Inside the Nudge Unit: How Changes can Make a Big Difference. London: WH Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, S. D., French, B., Small, D.S., et al. (2015) ‘Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation’, New England Journal of Medicine, 372: 2108–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B. and Torgerson, D. (2012) Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team (BIT).
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. et al. (eds.) (2014) World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (2018) How far to Nudge: Assessing Behavioural Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Pykett, J. and Whitehead, M. (2014) Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y. and Mellers, B. (2016) ‘American attitudes toward nudges’, Judgement and Decision Making 11(1): 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans, A.F., Cheung, T.T.L. and De Ridder, D.T.D. (2015) ‘Under consumers’ scrutiny: An investigation into consumers’ attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior’, BMC Public Health 15: 336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1691-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans, A.F., Marchiori, D. and De Ridder, D.T.D. (2016) The who and how of Nudging: Cross-National Perspectives on Consumer Approval in Eating Behaviour, Unpublished Manuscript, Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Loibl, C., Sunstein, C.R., Rauber, J. and Reisch, L. (2018) ‘Which Europeans like nudges? approval and controversy in four European countries’, Journal of Consumer Affairs ( forthcoming).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2017) Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons From Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osman, M., Fenton, N., Pilditch, T., Lagnado, D. and Neil, M. (2018) ‘Who do we trust on social policy interventions?’ Applied Social Psychology. available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI tbc] (accessed 17 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Steg, L. and Vlek, C. (2004) ‘Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use’, Environment and Behavior 36(1): 70–93. doi: 10.1177/0013916503251466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebonato, R. (2012) Taking Liberties: A Critique of Libertarian Paternalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. A. and Sunstein, C. R. (2016) ‘Do europeans like nudges?’ Judgement and Decision Making 11(4): 310–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff, M. and Hanley, C. (2014) ‘The default option: why a system of presumed consent may be effective at increasing rates of organ donation’, Psychology, Health & Medicine 19(5): 580–5. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2013.841967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, K. (Ed.) (2018) Behavioral Insights for Public Policy: Concepts and Cases. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa Lourenco, J., Ciriolo, E., Rafael Rodrigues Vieira de Almeida, S. and Troussard, X. (2016) Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy. Report No. EUR 27726 EN. Brussels: Joint Research Centre (JRC).
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2013) Simpler: The Future of Government. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2015) ‘The ethics of nudging’, Yale Journal on Regulation 32(2). available at http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol32/iss2/6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2016a) ‘Do people like nudges?’ Administrative Law Review 68: 177–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2016b) ‘People prefer system 2 nudges (kind of)’, Duke Law Journal 66(1): 121–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2018a) The Cost-Benefit Revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2018b) ‘Misconceptions about nudges’, Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy 2(1): 61–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. and Reisch, L. A. (2014) ‘Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection’, Harvard Environmental Law Review 38(1): 127–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. and Reisch, L. A. (eds.) (2017) The Economics of Nudge. Critical Concepts in Economics Series. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. and Reisch, L.A. (2019). Trusting Nudges: A Bill of Rights for Nudging. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A. and Rauber, J. (2018) ‘A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost’, Regulation & Governance 12(1): 3–22 (first published online 26 July 2017). doi: 10.1111/rego.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szazi, B., Palinkas, A., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A. and Aczel, B. (2017) ‘A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: toward understanding when and why nudges work’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, available at osf.io/dxbtz.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R. and Rogers, T. (2017) ‘On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions’, Nature Human Behaviour 1(7): 1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decision About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troussard, X. and van Bavel, R. (2018) ‘How can behavioural insights be used to improve EU policy?’ Intereconomics 53(1): 8–12. doi: 10.1007/s10272-018-0711-1
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Lilley, R., Pykett, J. and Howell, R. (2017) Neuroliberalism: Behavioural Government in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White House. (2015) Using behavioral science insights to better serve the American people. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 181. Executive Order 13707 of September 15. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23630.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2015) Mind, Society, and Behavior. World Development Report 2015. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• World Values Survey Wave 6. (2010–2014). Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association, available at www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
   Google Scholar