Rising despite the polycrisis? The European Parliament’s strategies of self-empowerment after Lisbon

References

• Akhtar, S.I. and Jones, V.C. (2014) Transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP) negotiations, congressional research service CRS report 7-5700.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. and Pedersen, R.B. (2013) Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E. and Chelotti, N. (2016) ‘The shadow of the European Council. Understanding legislation on economic governance’, Journal of European Integration 38(5): 511–25. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1178251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E. and Chelotti, N. (2018) ‘The European Parliament and economic governance: explaining a case of limited influence’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 24(1): 72–89. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2018.1444627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission (2010). Negotiation directives, available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2010/aug/eu-us-general-dp-agreement-mandate-2.pdf (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2014) Communication to the Commission Concerning Transparency in TTIP Negotiations (C(2014) 9052 final), available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2014/EN/3-2014-9052-EN-1-1.PDF (accessed 13 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, J. (2014) ‘EU ombudsman demands more TTIP transparency’, Euractiv, available at http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-industry/eu-ombudsman-demands-more-ttip-transparency-303831 (accessed 9 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Darnstädt, T. (2011, December 16) ‘The pitfalls of the merkozy fiscal pact’, Spiegel, available at http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/more-problems-than-answers-the-pitfalls-of-the-merkozy-fiscal-pact-a-803923.html (accessed 24 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, B. (2011) The European Treaty Amendment for the Creation of a Financial Stability Mechanism, European Policy Analysis 6epa, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2014) ‘Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1199–217. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EP (2009) European Parliament Resolution of 17 September 2009 on the Envisaged International Agreement to Make Available to the United States Treasury Department Financial Payment Messaging Data to Prevent and Combat Terrorism and Terrorist Financing (P7_TA(2009)0016), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2009-0016&language=EN (accessed 22 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2010a) Debates, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fTEXT%2bCRE%2b20100120%2bITEM-010%2bDOC%2bXML%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2010b) Motion for a Resolution, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-0243&language=EN (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2010c) European Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2010 on the Transparency and State of Play of the ACTA Negotiations, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2010-0058+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2010d) European Parliament Resolution of 24 November 2010 on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2010-0432+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2010e) European Parliament Resolution of 5 May 2010 on the Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to Authorise the Opening of Negotiations for an Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America to Make Available to the United States Treasury Department Financial Messaging Data to Prevent and Combat Terrorism and Terrorist Financing, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2010-0143+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 28 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2012) Conclusions of the European Council Meeting (8–9 December) on a Draft International Agreement on a Fiscal Stability Union, European Parliament Resolution of 18 January 2012, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0002+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 22 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2013) European Parliament Resolution of 23 May 2013 on EU Trade and Investment Negotiations with the United States of America, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2013-0227+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 30 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2015a) European Parliament Resolution of 8 July 2015 Containing the European Parliament’s Recommendations to the European Commission on the Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0252+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 4 October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• EP (2015b) All MEPs to have access to all confidential TTIP documents, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20151202IPR05759&language=EN&format=XML (accessed 4 October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2011a, December 15) ‘Europe’s new treaty: towards a multi-speed union’, Euractiv, available at http://www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/linksdossier/europe-s-new-treaty-towards-a-multi-speed-union/#ea-accordion-positions (accessed 24 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2011b, December 13) ‘PES leader: “golden rule’ should not be imposed”’, Euractiv, available at http://www.euractiv.com/section/euro-finance/interview/pes-leader-golden-rule-should-not-be-imposed/ (accessed 24 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2012a, October 19) Conclusions, available at http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-156-2012-INIT/en/pdf (accessed 29 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2012b, December 14) Conclusions, available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/134353.pdf (accessed 29 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2012c) Draft: treaty on stability, coordination and governance in the economic and monetary union, 10 January.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2012d) Draft: treaty on stability, coordination and governance in the economic and monetary union, 19 January.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2003) ‘Formal and informal institutions under codecision: continuous constitution-building in Europe’, Governance 16(4): 577–600. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2007) ‘Codecision and institutional change’, West European Politics 30(2): 285–300. doi: 10.1080/01402380701239723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasone, C. (2014) ‘European economic governance and parliamentary representation. What place for the European Parliament?’, European Law Journal 20(2): 164–85. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromage, D. (2018) ‘The European Parliament in the post-crisis era: an institution empowered on paper only?’, Journal of European Integration 40(3): 281–94. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1450405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F. and Moore, D. (2008) ‘Using final deadlines strategically in negotiation’, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 1(4): 371–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00022.x
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (1996) ‘The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making and its outcomes: regulatory policy as a patchwork’, Journal of European Public Policy 3(2): 149–67. doi: 10.1080/13501769608407026
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2007) Explaining Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Moury, C., Schoeller, M.G., Meissner, K.L. and Mota, I. (2015) The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536467/IPOL_STU(2015)536467_EN.pdf (accessed 29 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Høyland, B. (2013) ‘Empowerment of the European Parliament’, Annual Review of Political Science 16(1): 171–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jančić, D. (2016) ‘The role of the European Parliament and the US congress in shaping transatlantic relations: TTIP, NSA surveillance, and CIA renditions’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54(4): 896–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C. and Dionigi, M.K. (2017) Losing Out on Substance but Winning Procedurally? The European Parliament and Accountability in Crisis Legislation, unpublished article manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Köppel, Johannes (2011) The SWIFT affair: swiss banking secrecy and the fight against terrorist financing, The Graduate Institute 2011–9.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. and Schlosser, P. (2016) ‘Public finances in Europe: fortifying EU economic governance in the shadow of the crisis’, Journal of European Integration 38(3): 237–49. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1140158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. and Andersen, M.S. (1998) ‘Strategies of the ‘green’ member states in EU environmental policy-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 254–70. doi: 10.1080/135017698343974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and Goertz, G. (2004) ‘The possibility principle: choosing negative cases in comparative research’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 653–69. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404041401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2010) ‘Transaction-cost efficiency and the democratic deficit’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(2): 150–75. doi: 10.1080/13501760903561799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, K.S. (2017) ‘Negative case selection: justifications and consequences for set-theoretic MMR’, Sociological Methods & Research 46(4): 739–71. doi: 10.1177/0049124115591015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2010) ‘The rejection of the EU-US SWIFT interim agreement by the European parliament: a historic vote and its implications’, European Foreign Affairs Review 15(2): 143–51.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W.C., Strøm, K. and Bergman, T. (2003) ‘Parliamentary democracy: promise and problems’, in K. Strøm, W.C. Müller & T. Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, M., Salines, M. and Wieczorek, M. (2016) ‘The European Parliament’s strategy in EU economic and financial reform’ Journal of European Public Policy 23(2): 217–35. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1025091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombudsman (2014) Decision of the European Ombudsman Closing her Own-Initiative Inquiry OI/10/2014/RA Concerning the European Commission, available at http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cases/decision.faces/en/58668/html.bookmark (accessed 4 October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E. and Koop, C. (2013) ‘The informal politics of legislation: explaining secluded decision making in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies 46(9): 1112–42. doi: 10.1177/0010414011426415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2014) ‘Integration without representation? The European Parliament and the reform of economic governance in the EU’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(6): 1174–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2006) ‘Explaining the constitutionalization of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1148–67. doi: 10.1080/13501760600999474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) ‘The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization 55(1): 47–80. doi: 10.1162/002081801551414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. and Hahm, H. (2014) ‘Suspending vetoes: how the euro countries achieved unanimity in the fiscal compact’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1388–411. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.929167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, T. (2018) ‘The European Parliament and the eurozone crisis: an exceptional actor?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20: 632–51. doi:10.1177/1369148118768141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, D. (2015) ‘The transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP)’, House of Commons Library Standard Note. UK Parliament Report, United Kingdom, available at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06688/the-transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-ttip (accessed 10 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F. and Laffan, B. (2019) ‘Introduction: the European Union beyond the polycrisis: integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages’, this collection.
   Google Scholar
• Interviews
   Google Scholar
• Economic Governance
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1E (2015): European Parliament, senior official. Brussels, Belgium, 2 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 2 (2015): European Parliament, MEP, Brussels, Belgium, 4 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 5 (2015): European Parliament, senior official. Brussels, Belgium, 10 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 6E (2015): EU officials. Brussels, Belgium, 11 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 7 (2015): General Secretariat of the Council, senior official. Brussels, Belgium, 11 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 8 (2015): European Parliament, senior official. Brussels, Belgium, 12 February.
   Google Scholar
• Trade Policy
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1T (2015): European Commission. Brussels, Belgium. February 02, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 3 (2015): European Commission. Brussels, Belgium. February 09, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 6T (2015): European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium. February 11, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 11 (2015): European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium. February 26, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 12 (2015): European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium. February 27, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 13 (2015): European Commission. Brussels, Belgium. February 27, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 14 (2015): European Commission. Brussels, Belgium. February 27, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 16 (2018): European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium. October 9, 2018.
   Google Scholar