Getting around no: how governments react to negative EU referendums

References

• Bakker, R. (2015) ‘Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010’, Party Politics 21(1): 143–152. doi: 10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2018) ‘Referendums in the European Union’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, available at http://politics.oxfordre.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Los, B., McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., Thissen, M. and Van Oort, F. (2018) ‘The continental divide? Economic exposure to Brexit in regions and countries on both sides of the channel’, Papers in Regional Science 97: 25–54. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Goodwin, M. and Whiteley, P. (2017) Brexit. Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Closa, C. (2007) ‘Why convene referendums? Explaining choices in EU constitutional politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 14 (8): 1311–32. doi: 10.1080/13501760701656478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devuyst, Y. (2012) ‘The constitutional and Lisbon treaties’, in E. Jones, A. Menon and S. Weatherill (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–78.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E. and Hutter, S. (2016) ‘Beyond authority transfer: explaining the politicisation of Europe’, West European Politics 39 (1): 23–43. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. (2009) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, S. (2002) Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums, and European Integration, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, S. and Schulz, T. (2007) ‘Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process’, The Review of International Organizations 2 (2): 177–218. doi: 10.1007/s11558-007-9020-3
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, F. (1994) ‘Denmark and the ratification of the Maastricht treaty’, in F. Laursen and S. Vanhoonacker (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, pp. 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. (2003) ‘Applications of prospect theory to political science’, Synthese 135 (2): 215–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1023413007698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. (2017) ‘Prime Minister’s letter to Donald Tusk triggering Article 50’, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-letter-to-donald-tusk-triggering-article-50 (accessed 14 October 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, F. and Mendez, M. (2017) Referendums on EU Matters (PE 571.402). Brussels: European Parliament, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/571402/IPOL_STU(2017)571402_EN.pdf (accessed 14 October 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, K. (2013) ‘The politics of discretionary government commitment to European integration referendums’, Journal of European Public Policy 20 (5): 684–701. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.751715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996) ‘The path to European integration. A historical institutionalist analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 123–63. doi: 10.1177/0010414096029002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. (1999) ‘Measuring party orientations toward European integration: Results from an expert survey’, European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (2019) ‘Referendum challenges to the EU’s policy legitimacy – and how the EU responds’, Journal of European Public Policy 26 (2): 207–25. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1426034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018) ‘Brexit: negotiating differentiated disintegration in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (8): 1154–73. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triga, V. and Manavopoulos, V. (2017) ‘The Greek bailout referendum of 2015’, in F. Mendez and M. Mendez (eds), Referendums on EU Matters (PE 571.402), Brussels: European Parliament, pp. 119–41, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/571402/IPOL_STU(2017)571402_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Varoufakis, Y. (2017) Adults in the Room. My Battle with Europe’s Deep Establishment. London: The Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2017) ‘National votes with international consequences. A democratic threat to cooperation?’ available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3057637.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S., Dinas, E., Jurado, I. and Konstantinidis, N. (2018) ‘Non-cooperation by popular vote. Expectations, foreign intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum’, International Organization 72 (4): 969–94. doi: 10.1017/S0020818318000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar