968
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Politicisation and economic governance design

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agence Europe. (1996, November 12). Europe Daily Bullettin n. 6851, 5.
  • Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2014). The unexpected winner of the crisis: The European Commission’s strengthened role in economic governance. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 213–229.
  • Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722.
  • Biermann, F., Guérin, N., Jagdhuber, S., Rittberger, B., & Weiss, M. (2019). Political (non-)reform in the euro crisis and the refugee crisis: A liberal intergovernmentalist explanation. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 246–266.
  • Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018). From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108.
  • Bressanelli, E., Koop, C. and Reh, C. (2020) ‘EU actors under pressure: politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341.
  • Buiter, W. H. (2006). The “sense and nonsense of Maastricht” revisited: What have we learnt about stabilization in EMU? Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 687–710.
  • Buiter, W. H., Corsetti, G., Roubini, N., Repullo, R., & Frankel, J. (1993). Excessive deficits: Sense and nonsense in the treaty of Maastricht. Economic Policy, 8(16), 57.
  • Claeys, G., Darvas, Z., & Leandro, À. (2016). A proposal to revive the European Fiscal Framework. Brussels: Bruegel.
  • Dehousse, R. (2016). Why has EU macroeconomic governance become more supranational? Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 617–631.
  • Eichengreen, B., & Wyplosz, C. (1998). The stability pact: More than a minor nuisance? Economic Policy, 13(26), 65–113.
  • Fabbrini, S. (2013). Intergovernmentalism and its limits assessing the European Union’s answer to the euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1003–1029.
  • Fabbrini, S. (2016). From consensus to domination: The intergovernmental union in a crisis situation. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 587–599.
  • Fabbrini, S., & Puetter, U. (2016). Integration without supranationalisation: Studying the lead roles of the European Council and the Council in post-Lisbon EU politics. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 481–495.
  • Franchino, F. (2007) The powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garrett, G., & Tsebelis, G. (1996). An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism. International Organization, 50(2), 269–299.
  • Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From market integration to core state powers: The Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196.
  • Heipertz, M., & Verdun, A. (2005). The stability and growth pact - theorizing a case in European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(5), 985–1008.
  • Heipertz, M., & Verdun, A. C. (2010). Ruling Europe: The politics of the stability and growth pact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
  • Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (2016) Politicising Europe: Integration and mass politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kriesi, H., & Grande, E. (2016). The euro crisis: A boost to the politicisation of European integration? In S. Hutter, E. Grande, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and mass politics (pp. 240–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lehner, T., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). Political conflict in the reform of the Eurozone. European Union Politics, 20(1), 45–64.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Niemann, A., & Ioannou, D. (2015). European economic integration in times of crisis: A case of neofunctionalism? Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 196–218.
  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1998). The myth (or folly) of the 3% deficit/GDP Maastricht “parameter”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(1), 103–116.
  • Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration. An historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.
  • Puetter, U. (2012). Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: The role of the council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 161–178.
  • Puetter, U. (2016). The centrality of consensus and deliberation in contemporary EU politics and the new intergovernmentalism. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 601–615.
  • Savage, J. D., & Verdun, A. (2016). ‘Strengthening the European Commission’s budgetary and economic surveillance capacity since Greece and the euro area crisis: A study of five directorates-general’. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 101–118.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2014). European integration in the euro crisis: The limits of postfunctionalism. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 321–337.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 177–195.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2020) ‘Politicisation management in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 342–361.
  • Schure, P., & Verdun, A. (2008). Legislative bargaining in the European union: The divide between large and small member states. European Union Politics, 9(4), 459–486.
  • Segers, M., & van Esch, F. (2007). Behind the veil of budgetary discipline: The political logic of the budgetary rules in EMU and the SGP. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(5), 1089–1109.
  • Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.