Politicisation management in the European Union

References

• Alexandrova, P., Rasmussen, A., & Toshkov, D. (2016). Agenda responsiveness in the European Council: Public priorities, policy problems and political attention. West European Politics, 39(4), 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. (2020). The Court of Justice in times of politicisation: “law as a mask and shield” revisited. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 382–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2020). Introduction. EU actors under pressure: Politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2020). Understanding the European Commission’s use of politicisation in the negotiation of interinstitutional agreements: The role of consultations and issue framing. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 439–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, A., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization, 47(1), 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P. (2011). No polity for old politics: A framework for analyzing the politicisation of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 559–575.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicisation of European integration be reversed? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(s1), 137–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchino, F., & Mariotto, C. (2020). Politicisation and economic governance design. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 460–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2014). Introduction: Beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers. In P. Genschel & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Hutter, S. (2016). Beyond authority transfer: Explaining the politicisation of Europe. West European Politics, 39(1), 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). ‘Conclusions: The postfunctionalists were (almost) right’. In S. Hutter, E. Grande, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Politicising Europe. integration and mass politics (pp. 279–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J. (1996). State interests and international rule trajectories: A neorealist interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European economic and monetary Union. Security Studies, 5(3), 261–306.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. (1961). International integration: The European and the universal process. International Organization, 15, 366–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1968). The uniting of Europe. Political, social, and economic forces 1950–1957 (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2017). Government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council voting. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 850–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining institutional change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: Of foxes and lions. European Political Science Review, 9(4), 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2014). Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2016). Fleeing the centre: The rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics, 39(5), 971–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2020). Contestation and responsiveness in EU Council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 362–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crisis: Lipset, Rokkan and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, M., & Minaudier, C. (2019). Negotiating under political uncertainty: National elections and the dynamics of international co-operation. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 315–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T. (2018). Still the century of intergovernmentalism? Partisan ideology, two-level bargains and technocratic governance in the post-Maastricht era. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1240–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., Reh, C., & Bressanelli, E. (2018). When politics prevails: Parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-Be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2007). Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, K., & Schoeller, M. (2019). Rising despite the polycrisis? The European Parliament’s strategies of self-empowerment after Lisbon. Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1619187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, F., & Mendez, M. (2017). Referendums on EU Matters (PE 571.402). Brussels: European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/571402/IPOL_STU(2017)571402_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milward, A. (2000). The European rescue of the nation state (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1994). Why the European Union strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation (CES Working Paper 52).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power From messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2002). In defence of the “democratic deficit”: Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschella et al. (2020). Let’s speak more? How the ECB responds to public contestation. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 400–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neunreither, K. (1998). Governance without opposition: The case of the European Union. Government and Opposition, 33(4), 419–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, S. (2013). The silence of ministers: Consensus and blame avoidance in the Council of the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1091–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration. A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2016). A responsive technocracy? EU politicisation and the consumer policies of the European commission. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2019). EU politicisation and policy initiatives of the European Commission: The case of consumer policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(3), 344–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Bressanelli, E., & Koop, C. (2020). Responsive withdrawal? The politics of EU agenda-setting. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2005). Building Europe's parliament. Democratic representation beyond the nation-state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014). European integration in the euro crisis: The limits of postfunctionalism. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 969–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Getting around no: How governments react to negative EU referendums. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 1056–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1969). Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration. International Organization, 23(1), 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. (2019). The responsive Union. National elections and European governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R. A., & Haverland, M. (2018). Bread and butter or bread and circuses? Politicisation and the European Commission in the European Semester. European Union Politics, 19(3), 524–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.
   Google Scholar
• Whitefield, S., & Rohrschneider, R. (2019). Embedding integration: How European integration splits mainstream parties. Party Politics, 25(1), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2020). Government Euroscepticism and differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1703789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K. D. (1999). The new raison d’état as a problem for democracy in world society. European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 333–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K. D. (2000). Die Neue Staatsräson – Zwischenstaatliche Kooperation als Demokratieproblem in der Weltgesellschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Wratil, C. (2018). Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiating positions. European Union Politics, 19(1), 52–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar