Understanding the European Commission’s use of politicisation in the negotiation of interinstitutional agreements: the role of consultations and issue framing

References

• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. (2020). The court of justice in times of politicisation: ‘law as a mask and shield’ revisited. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 382–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2020). EU actors under pressure: Politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2018). Legitimacy through targeted transparency? Regulatory effectiveness and sustainability of lobbying regulation in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 378–403. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A., & Thomson, R. (2015). Consultations with interest groups and the empowerment of executives: evidence from the European Union. Governance, 28(4), 517–531. doi: 10.1111/gove.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cini, M. (2013). EU decision-making on inter-institutional agreements: Defining (common) rules of conduct for European lobbyists and public servants. West European Politics, 36(6), 1143–1158. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.826022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(40), 654–666. doi: 10.1080/13501760701314474
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicisation of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 137–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilder, P. (2011). No polity for old politics? A framework for analysing the politicisation of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 559–575. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
   Google Scholar
• Eiselt, I., Pollak, J., & Slominski, P. (2007). Codifying temporary stability? The role of interinstitutional agreements in budgetary affairs. European Law Journal, 13(1), 75–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiselt, I. and Slominski, P. (2007) ‘Sub-constitutional engineering: Negotiation, content, and legal value of interinstitutional agreement in the EU’, European Law Journal 12(2): 209–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00316.x
   Google Scholar
• Eising, R., Rasch, D. and Rozbicka, P. (2015). Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4): 516–533. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euractiv. (2015). Commission denies power grab claims over ‘Better Regulation’. May 19th, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/science-policymaking/news/commission-denies-power-grab-claims-over-better-regulation/.
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv. (2018). Parliament VP: We cannot ‘copy and paste’ Commission transparency rules. November 17th, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/interview/parliament-vp-we-cannot-copy-and-paste-commission-transparency-rules/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). Better Regulation Agenda: Enhancing transparency and scrutiny for better EU law-making. Press release. (Strasbourg, 19.05.2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b). Fact Sheet. Better Regulation Agenda: Questions and Answers. (Strasbourg, 19.05.2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a). Delivering on transparency: Commission proposes mandatory Transparency Register for all EU institutions. Press release. (Brussels, 28.09.2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b). Fact Sheet. Questions and Answers: Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory Transparency Register. (Brussels, 28 September).
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Hutter, S. (2016). Introduction: Europe integration and the challenge of politicisation. In S. Hutter, E. Grande, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and mass politics (pp. 3–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M., de Ruiter, M., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Agenda-setting by the European Commission. Seeking the public? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 327–345. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1249014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietz, D., & Maurer, A. (2007). The European Parliament in treaty reform: Predefining ICGs through interinstitutional agreements. European Law Journal, 13(1), 20–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., Mahoney, C. and Opper, M. (2015). Framing in context: How interest groups employs framing to lobby the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4): 481–498. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Oztas, B. (2017). Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1118–1150. doi: 10.1177/0010414016666839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (1994). Inter-institutional agreements: The phenomenon and its new dynamics after Maastricht. Common Market Law Review, 31, 693–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President Juncker's Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission. Opening statement in the European Parliament Session. (Strasbourg, 15.07.2014). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/president-junckers-political-guidelines_en.
   Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2011). Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 927–943. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2019). EU politicisation and policy initiatives of the European Commission: The case of consumer policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(3), 344–365. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1453528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Bressanelli, E., & Koop, C. (2020). Responsive withdrawal? The politics of EU agenda-setting. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M. (2010). Framing Europe: The policy shaping strategies of the European Commission. Dordrecht: Mrtinhus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Riekmann, S. P. (2007). The cocoon of power: Democratic implications of interinstitutional agreements. European Law Journal, 13(1), 4–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfenning, F. (2020). Politicisation management in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 342–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. V. (2019) Politicisation in the EU: Between national politics and EU political dynamics. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7): 1018–1036. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1619189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. doi: 10.1177/1065912907313077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. (2017). The politicisation of ex post policy evaluation in the EU. European Journal of Law Reform, 19(1), 74–96. doi: 10.5553/EJLR/138723702017019102005
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2010) Integrating Europe. Informal politics and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2012) Informal governance in the EU: The European Commission versus the European Parliament. In T. Christiansen and C. Neuhold (Eds.), International handbook of informal governance (pp. 395–411) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Statham, P., & Trenz, H. J. (2013). How European Union politicisation can emerge through contestation: The constitution case. Journal of Commons Market Studies, 51(5), 965–980. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, P., & Trenz, H. J. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms of EU politicisation: Lessons from the Eurozone crisis. Comparative European Politics, 13(3), 287–306. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R. A., & Haverland, M. (2018). Bread and butter or bread and circuses? Politicisation and the European Commission in the European Semester. European Union Politics, 19(3), 524–545. doi: 10.1177/1465116518769753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013) The normalization of the European Commission politics and bureaucracy in the EU Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2016). Opening up Europe: Next steps in politicisation research. West European Politics, 39(1), 164–118. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar