References
- Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Cornell University Press.
- Bauer, M., & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162833
- Beerli, M. (2018). Saving the saviors. Security practices and professional struggles in the humanitarian space. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olx023
- Betts, A. (2009). Institutional proliferation and the global refugee regime. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090082
- Beveridge, R., & Naumann, M. (2014). Global norms, local contestation: Privatisation and de/politicisation in Berlin. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 275–291.
- Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.). (2009). Managers of global change. The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. MIT Press.
- Bouësseau, M.-C., Reis, A., & Ho, W. C. (2011). Global summits of national ethics committees: An essential tool for international dialogue and consensus-building. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(3), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2011.062.
- Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que Parler Veut Dire. Fayard.
- Council of Europe. (1990). 7th Conference of European Ministers of Justice, Istanbul, 5-7 June 1990, Resolution No. 3 on bioethics.
- Cox, R., & Jacobson, H. K. (Eds.). (1973). The anatomy of influence: Decision making in international organization. Yale University Press.
- Ege, J., Bauer, M. W., & Wagner, N. (2019). Improving generalizability in transnational bureaucratic influence research: A (modest) proposal. International Studies Review, 95(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz026.
- Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-politics, depoliticization, and governance. Oxford University Press.
- Goddard, S. E. (2009). Brokering change: Networks and entrepreneurs in international politics. International Theory, 1(2), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000128
- Goldstein, J. (1993). Ideas, interests and American trade policy. Cornell University Press.
- Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford University Press.
- Haftel, Y., & Hofmann, S. C. (2019). Rivalry and overlap: Why regional economic organizations encroach on security organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(9), 2180–2206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719832057
- Hall, N. (2016). Displacement, development, and climate change: International organizations moving beyond their mandates. Routledge.
- Hansen, H. K., & Mühlen-Schulte, A. (2012). The power of numbers in global governance. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15(4), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2012.1
- Hay, C. (2014). Depoliticisation as process, governance as practice: What did the “first wave” get wrong and do we need a “a second wave” to put it right? Policy & Politics, 42(2), 293–411. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X13959960668217
- Herbst, S. (2003). Political authority in a mediated age. Theory and Society, 32(4), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025571226279
- Knill, C., & Bauer, M. (2016). Policy-making by international public administrations: Concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080.13501763.2016.116.89.79 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168979
- Lenoir, N. (1999). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights: The first legal and ethical framework at the global level. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 30(1), 537–587.
- Littoz-Monnet, A. (2015). Ethics experts as a tool of technocratic governance: Evidence from the EU’s human embryonic stem cell research policy. Governance, 28(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12102
- Littoz-Monnet, A. (2017). Expert knowledge as a strategic resource: International bureaucrats and the shaping of bioethical standards. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx016
- Lopez, J. (2004). How sociology can save bioethics … maybe. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(7), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00421.x
- Maertens, L. (2019). From blue to green? Environmentalization and securitization in UN peacekeeping practices. International Peacekeeping, 26(3), 302–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2019.1579648
- Maertens, L., & Parizet, R. (2017). On ne fait pas de politique! Les pratiques de dépolitisation au PNUD et au PNUE. Critique Internationale, 3(3), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.076.0041
- Müller, B.2013). The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations. Pluto Press.
- Nay, O. (2012). What drives reforms in International Organizations. External Pressure and bureaucratic Entrepreneurs in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32, 53–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000183
- Porter, T. (1996). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
- Rimkutė, D. (2018). Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs. Public Administration, 96(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12389
- Ritter, A. (2009). Expertise für die WHO. UZH New article. http://www.uzh.ch/news/articles/2009/who-kollaborationszentren.html
- Salter, B., & Salter, C. (2007). Bioethics and the global moral economy: The cultural politics of human embryonic stem cell science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(5), 554–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805303202
- Seabrooke, L. (2014). Epistemic arbitrage: Transnational professional knowledge in action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jot005
- Stone, D. (2017). Global governance depoliticized: Knowledge networks, scientization and anti-policy. In P. Fawcett, M. Flinders, C. Hay, & M. Wood (Eds.), Anti-politics, depoliticization, and governance (pp. 91–133). Oxford University Press.
- Strange, S. (2015). States and markets. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Trondal, J. (2016). Advances to the study of international public administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168982
- UNESCO. (1997). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genome-and-human-rights/
- UNESCO. (2003a). International declaration on human genetic data. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genetic-data/
- UNESCO. (2003b). 31st session, records of the general conference Paris, 15 Oct–3 Nov 2001. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001289/128966m.pdf
- UNESCO. (2005). Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/
- UNESCO. (2008). Ethics of science and technology at UNESCO, SHS/EST/GEOBS/2008/PI/1.
- UNESCO. (2014). Basic texts.
- WHO. (2010-2011). Global network of WHO collaborating centres for bioethics: Annual report. www.who.int/ethics/partnerships/WHO_CC_Annual_Report_2010-2011.pdf
- WHO. (2010a). Eleventh general programme of work, 2006–2015. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63
- WHO. (2010b). Global network of WHO collaborating centers for bioethics, terms of reference. https://www.who.int/ethics/partnerships/global_network_terms_of_reference.pdf_30-en.pdf
- Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2008). ”To be, but not to be seen”: Exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00706.x
- Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012