Human rights violations and the gender gap in asylum recognition rates

References

• Arrow, K. (1973). The theory of discrimination. Discrimination in Labor Markets, in: O. Ashenfelter and A. Rees (eds.): Discrimination in Labor Markets. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF. (2010). Geschlechtsspezifische Verfolgung in ausgewählten Herkunftsländern. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/1337215.html.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF. (2019). The Stages of the German Asylum Procedure. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. https://www.bamf.de/EN/Themen/AsylFluechtlingsschutz/AblaufAsylverfahrens/ablaufasylverfahrens-node.html
   Google Scholar
• Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science, 354(6309), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., & Dilli, S. (2015). The gender gap in political participation in Muslim-majority countries. International Political Science Review, 36(5), 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114528228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, H. (2000). Gender, persecution and the concept of politics in the asylum determination process. Forced Migration Review, 9, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Desposato, S., & Norrander, B. (2009). The gender gap in Latin America: Contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, A., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Haselmayer, M. (2020). Gender bias in asylum adjudications: Evidence for Leniency toward token women. Sex Roles, 82(1-2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01030-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellinger, S. (2001). Frauen im Asylverfahren. In Asylpraxis – Schriftenreihe des Bundesamtes für die Anerkennung ausländischer Flüchtlinge. Band 4 (pp. 15–43). Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.
   Google Scholar
• Emeriau, M. (2019). Learning to be unbiased: Evidence from the French Asylum Office (Unpublished working paper). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., & Stigwall, K. (2019). Women-friendliness in European asylum policies: The role of women’s political representation and opposition to non-EU immigration. Comparative Political Studies, 52(9), 1293–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, B. A., & Tucker, J. R. (2019). The international political economy data resource. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9285-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, T., Schneider, G., & Widmer, T. (2000). Discriminating decentralization: Federalism and the handling of asylum applications in Switzerland, 1988–1996. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(2), 250–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, A.-S., Kotsadam, A., & Nerman, M. (2014). The gender gap in African political participation: Testing theories of individual and contextual determinants. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.833321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., & Léonard, S. (2012). The development of the EU asylum policy: Venue-shopping in perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9), 1396–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.677191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, L. C., Holmes, J. S., & Miller, B. P. (2013). Explaining the divergence in asylum grant rates among immigration judges: An attitudinal and cognitive approach. Law & Policy, 35(4), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, N. (1993). Gender-related persecution: Assessing the asylum claims of women. Cornell International Law Journal, 26(3), 625–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebner, I. (2017). Geschlechtsspezifische Verfolgung aus Sicht des BAMF. In Geschlechtsspezifische Verfolgung: Keine Relevanz für Schutzsuchende? Ein Fachtag für Beraterinnen und Berater. 18. Januar 2017. Landeshaus Kiel, 59–71. https://www.nds-fluerat.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Dokumentation-Veranstaltung-geschlechtsspezifische-Verfolgung-18.01.2017-Landeshaus-Kiel-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mascini, P. (2008). Explaining inequality in the implementation of asylum law. Refuge: Canada's Periodical on Refugees, 25(2), 164–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.26038
   Google Scholar
• Mascini, P., & Van Bochove, M. (2009). Gender stereotyping in the Dutch asylum procedure: “independent” men versus “dependent” women. International Migration Review, 43(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-9183.2008.01149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2005). Asylum recognition rates in Western Europe: Their determinants, variation, and lack of convergence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704271057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2017). Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramji-Nogales, J., Schoenholtz, A. I., & Schrag, P. G. (2011). Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, L., & Schneider, G. (2017). Dezentraler Asylvollzug diskriminiert: Anerkennungsquoten von Flüchtlingen im bundesdeutschen Vergleich, 2010–2015. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 58(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2017-1-23
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, G., & Riedel, L. (2017). The asylum lottery: Recognition rates vary strongly within Germany. Blog entry. https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/the-asylum-lottery-recognition-rates-vary-strongly-within-germany/
   Google Scholar
• Scipioni, M. (2018). Failing forward in EU migration policy? EU integration after the 2015 asylum and migration crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1357–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1325920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D., & de Haan, L. (2013). The Europeanization of asylum policy: An assessment of the EU impact on asylum applications and recognitions rates. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.726482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wetten, J. W., Dijkhoff, N., & Heide, F. (1998). De positie van vrouwen in de asielprocedure [The position of women in the asylum procedure]. Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice, no. 172.
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. (2016). Why EU asylum standards exceed the lowest common denominator: The role of regulatory expertise in EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1039565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar