The power of expertise: gauging technocracy in EMU reform negotiations

References

• Arregui, J., & Thomson, R. (2009). States’ bargaining success in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 655–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760902983168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, S. (2004). Bargaining success in the European Union: The impact of exogenous and endogenous power resources. European Union Politics, 5(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116504040447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour, R., & David-Wilp, S. (2016). Five Myths about the European Union. Washington Post, July 15. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-european-union/2016/07/15/2f254ffa-49da-11e6-bdb9-701687974517_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e6191f935db0.
   Google Scholar
• Bastasin, C. (2015). Saving Europe: Anatomy of a dream. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2014). The unexpected winner of the crisis: The European commission’s strengthened role in economic Governance. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.885750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The new inter-governmentalism: European integration in the post-maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12212
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Stokman, F. N. (1994). European community Decision Making: models, Applications, and Comparisons. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2002). The role of supranational actors in EU treaty reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110104163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., & Jørgensen, K. E. (1998). Negotiating treaty reform in the European Union: The role of the European Commission. International Negotiations, 3(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069820848319
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, D. (1970). Politics and bureaucracy in the European Community. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, D. G., & Kassim, H. (2005). Inside the European Commission: preference formation and the convention on the future of Europe. Comparative European Politics, 3(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110056
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In F. I. Greenstein, & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of Political Science. political Science: Scope and Theory (pp. 94–137). Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. A., & Rhodes, M. (2016). The political dynamics behind Europe’s new banking union. West European Politics, 39(3), 415–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1143238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2013). Intergovernmentalism and its limits: Assessing the European Union’s answer to the euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1003–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013489502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2002). How intergovernmental are intergovernmental Conferences? An example from the Maastricht treaty reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 98–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110104190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Hartlapp, M., Leiber, S., & Treib, O. (2004). Non-compliance with EU Directives in the member states: Opposition through the backdoor? West European Politics, 27(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000228095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Hierarchical/Multilevel Models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Is there a (viable) crucial-case method? Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnell, J. G. (1982). The technocratic image and the theory of technocracy. Technology and Culture, 23(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3104485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högenauer, A-L, & Howarth, D. (2016). Unconventional monetary policies and the European Central Bank's problematic democratic legitimacy. Journal of Public Law, 17(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., & Matthijs, M. (2019). Rethinking Central Bank independence. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., & Laffan, B. (2019). The Juncker presidency: The ‘political commission’ in practice. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12941
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Oztas, B. (2017). Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1118–1150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, F. N. (1990). Technocracy revisited: Knowledge, power and the crisis in energy decision making. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669000400103
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, M., Bailer, S., Dellmuth, L. M., Tallberg, J., & Târlea, S. (2019a). Bargaining success in the reform of the Eurozone. European Union Politics, 20(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518811073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, M., Tallberg, J., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019b). Supranational Influence in the Reform of the Eurozone. Paper presented at the PEIO Conference. Salzburg, 7-9 February.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., & Blyth, M. (2017). Theresa May’s Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day Explains Why Democracy Is Better than Technocracy. Washington Post - Monkey Cage. October 5. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/10/05/theresa-mays-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day-explains-why-democracy-is-better-than-technocracy/?utm_term=.e2bcd16143ab.
   Google Scholar
• Meynaud, J. (1969). Technocracy. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The undemocratic dilemma. The Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D. (2007). Network Capital and Cooperation Patterns in the Working Groups of the Council of the EU. European University Institute RSCAS Working Paper 14.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2017). Juncker’s political European Commission and an EU in crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2004). Depoliticizing democracy. Ratio Juris, 17(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (1997). Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European community. International Organization, 51(1), 99–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2012). Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: The role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.609743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1999). Technocracy in the European Union. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2017). From a deficit of democracy to a technocratic order: The postcrisis debate on Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 351–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited - Part Two: The Classical Issues. Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). What's the News in New Intergovernmentalism: A Critique of Bickerton, Hodson and Puetter. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 723–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. (2018). The Responsive Union: National elections and European Governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. (2018). Leadership by default: The ECB and the announcement of outright monetary transactions. Credit and Capital Markets, 51(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.51.1.73
   Google Scholar
• Schön-Quinlivan, E., & Scipioni, M. (2017). The Commission as policy entrepreneur in European economic governance: A comparative multiple stream analysis of the 2005 and 2011 reform of the Stability and Growth Pact. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(8), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1206140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scicluna, N. (2014). Politicization without democratization: How the Eurozone crisis is transforming EU law and politics. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), 545–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. (2005). ‘Deliberative,’ ‘independent’ technocracy v. democratic politics: Will the globe Echo the E.U.? Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3/4), 341–356.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, S., & Beach, D. (2020). Political and instrumental leadership in major EU reforms. The role and influence of the EU institutions in setting-up the fiscal compact. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1572211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, S., Jaschke, A., & Beach, D. (2019). The role of the EU institutions in establishing the European stability mechanism: Institutional Leadership under a Veil of Intergovernmentalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(4), 675–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarlea, S. (2018). Parties, Power and Policy-Making: From Higher Education to Multinationals in Post-Communist Societies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlea, S., & Bailer, S. (2020). Technocratic governments in European negotiations. In E. Bertsou, & D. Caramani (Eds.), The technocratic challenge to democracy (pp. 148–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlea, S., Bailer, S., Degner, H., Dellmuth, L. M., Leuffen, D., Lundgren, M., Tallberg, J., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). Explaining governmental preferences on economic and monetary union reform. European Union Politics, 20(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518814336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarlea, S., & Freyberg-Inan, A. (2018). The education skills trap in a dependent market economy. Romania’s case in the 2000s. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Arregui, J., Leuffen, D., Costello, R., Cross, J., Hertz, R., & Jensen, T. (2012). A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII). Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 604–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.662028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooze, A. (2018). Crashed: How a decade of financial crises changed the world. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Tortola, P. D. (2020a). Technocracy and depoliticization. In E. Bertsou, & D. Caramani (Eds.), The technocratic challenge to democracy (pp. 61–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tortola, P. D. (2020b). The politicization of the European Central Bank: What is it, and how to study it? Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(3), 501–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortola, P. D., & Pansardi, P. (2019). The Charismatic leadership of the ECB presidency: A language-based analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2017). Political Leadership of the European Central Bank. Journal of European Integration, 39(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1277715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected: Democracy and the new separation of powers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W., & Smith, J. (1995). Democracy or technocracy? European integration and the problem of popular consent. West European Politics, 18(3), 137–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425095
   Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen, F., Leuffen, D., Kudrna, Z., & Degner, H. (2019). Analysing European Union decision-making during the Eurozone crisis with new data. European Union Politics, 20(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518814954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013). The normalization of the European Commission: Politics and bureaucracy in the EU executive. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar