The two faces of conflict: how internal and external conflict affect interest group influence

References

• Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B. L., & Kimball, D. C. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191–1213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods. foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., & Rasmussen, A. (2020). When does government listen to the public? Voluntary associations and dynamic agenda representation in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 111–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., & De Bruycker, I. (2018). Lobbying makes (strange) bedfellows: Explaining the formation and composition of lobbying coalitions in EU legislative politics. Political Studies, 66(4), 959–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717728408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. W. (2020). Unity and conflict: Explaining financial industry lobbying success in European Union public consultations. Regulation & Governance, 14(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. (2020). Democratically deficient, yet responsive? How politicization facilitates responsiveness in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(6), 834–852. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2019). Lobbying strategies and success: Inside and outside lobbying in European Union legislative politics. European Political Science Review, 11(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A. (2008). Interest groups in the European Union: How powerful are they? West European Politics, 31(6), 1212–1230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., Bernhagen, P., & Marshall, D. (2015). Interest group success in the European Union: When (and why) does business lose? Comparative Political Studies, 48(8), 951–983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014565890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A, & Mateo, G. (2014). Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1199–1217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A, & Mateo, G. (2016). Insiders versus outsiders: Interest group politics in multilevel Europe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011, December 13). Directive on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA, 2011/92/EU, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, N., & Klüver, H. (2016). Voting against your constituents? How lobbying affects representation. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 190–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. (2019). When diversity works: The effects of coalition composition on the success of lobbying coalitions. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 660–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Framing by the flock: Collective issue definition and advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 52(4), 483–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2011). The contextual nature of lobbying: Explaining lobbying success in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(4), 483–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511413163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Pira, T. M. (2008). Information as lobbying, or lobbying as information? Argument quality, group credibility, and heuristic processing in congress. Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 951–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. (2013). Lobbying influence: Meaning, measurement and missing. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2012.20
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., & Marchetti, K. (2012). You don’t know Jack: Principals, agents and lobbying. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(2), 139–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2012.15
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000608
   Google Scholar
• Miler, K. C. (2009). The limitations of heuristics for political elites. Political Psychology, 30(6), 863–894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., & Yackee, S. W. (2012). Lobbying coalitions and government policy change: An analysis of federal agency rulemaking. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. K. (2015). The battle for influence: The politics of business lobbying in the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L. K., & Reher, S. (2018). With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Truijens, D. G. (2021). Interest representation and experimentalist governance in the EU: New modes of lobbying. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar