Policy research under pressure: the case of the Ministry of Justice in the Netherlands

References

• Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blijenbergh, I. (2010). Case selection. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 61–63). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2008). The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in european Union Immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. A. P., ‘t Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2006). The politics of policy evaluation. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buick, F., Blackman, D., O'Flynn, J., O'Donnell, M., & West, D. (2015). Effective practitioner-scholar relationships: Lessons from a coproduction partnership. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption. Using an explorative case-study design. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 640–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00904.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., & Meijer, A. (2019). Social media and value conflicts. An explorative study of the Dutch police. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch_News (Producer). (2017). Justice ministry manipulated studies into cannabis policy, says Nieuwsuur. https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2017/12/justice-ministry-manipulated-studies-into-cannabis-policy-says-nieuwsuur/.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2020). Scientific advice at a Time of Emergency. SAGE and Covid-19. The Political Quarterly, 91(3), 514–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2009). Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S., & Sutton, R. (1986). Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 5–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/255857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 14–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X012002014
   Google Scholar
• Hertogh, M., Peters, M., Van der Zande, A., & De Graaf, G. (2019). Ongemakkelijk onderzoek: Naar een betere balans in de relatie tussen WODC en beleid. Onderzoekscommissie WODC II.
   Google Scholar
• Hoesel, P. H. M. V. (1985). Het programmeren van sociaal beleidsonderzoek: analyse en receptuur. Universiteit Utrecht: Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, T. (2004). Pretend it works: Evidence and governance in the evaluation of the Reducing Burglary Initiative. Criminal Justice, 4(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802504048467
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. (2010). Extreme cases. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (pp. 379–381). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). Moral Courage. William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F., & Donaldson, S. (2015). Theory in evaluation: Reducing confusion and encouraging Deabte. Evaluation, 21(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015607712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. (2013). Barriers to the influence of evidence on policy: Are politicians the problem? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 20(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2012.754403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzi, T., & Smith-Bowers, B. (2010). Partnership, servitude, or expert Scholarship? The Academic Labour process in contract Housing research. In C. Allen & R. Imrie (Eds.), The knowledge business: Critical perspectives on contract research (pp. 133–147). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2020). Lesson-Drawing from New Zealand andCovid-19: The need for anticipatory policy making. The Political Quarterly, 91, 561–570. https://doi-org.vu-nl.idm.oclc.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T., & Hinchman, L. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonize politics. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. (2015). Research on evaluation ethics: Reflections and a agenda. New Directions for Evaluation, (148), 31–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20155
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Clark, B. (2013). You want Me To Do WHAT? Evaluators and The pressure to misrepresent findings. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012457237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. (2018). retrieved October 27, 2020 from, https://www.nwo.nl/en/documents/nwo/policy/netherlands-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity
   Google Scholar
• Pleger, L., & Sager, F. (2016). Don't Tell Me Cause It Hurts. Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 15(1), 23–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleger, L., & Sager, F. (2018). Betterment, undermining, support and Distortian: A Heuristic Model for the analysis of pressure on evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 166–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleger, L., Sager, F., Morris, M., Meyer, W., & Stockmann, R. (2017). Are some countries more prone to pressure evaluators than others? Comparing findings from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Switzerland. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016662907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. (1978). The Acquisition and Utilization of technical information by administrative agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(3), 396–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2392417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J., & Jordan, A. (2017). Governing policy evaluation? Towards a New typology. Evaluation, 23(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389017715366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, W. (2017, 8 December). Wetenschap bij een Ministerie is Niet Anders dan die aan een Universiteit. Trouw.
   Google Scholar
• Stockmann, R., Meyer, W., & Schenke, H. (2011). Unabhängigkeit von evoluationen. Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 10(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• The-LSE-GV314-Group. (2014). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1), 224–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulemonde, J. (2000). Evaluation culture(s) in Europe: Differences and convergence between national practices. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 69(3), 350 –357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.69.3.350
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1993). Where politics and evaluation reserach meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(93)90046-R
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar