Asymmetric ratification standards and popular perceptions of legitimacy

References

• Arnesen, S., Broderstad, T. S., Johannesson, M. P., & Linde, J. (2019). Conditional legitimacy: How turnout, majority size, and outcome affect perceptions of legitimacy in European Union membership referendums. European Union Politics, 20(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518820163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, institutions and Attitudes about citizen influence on Government. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., Frandsen, B. R., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Randomization inference in the regression discontinuity design: An application to Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Causal Inference, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2019). A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F. (2011). The Government of the Peoples. On the Idea and Principles of Multilateral Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). The case for Demoicracy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christin, T., & Hug, S. (2002). Referendums and citizen support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 35(5), 586–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closa, C. (2007). Why convene referendums? Explaining choices in EU constitutional politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), 1311–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701656478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., & Ladi, S. (2019). In the name of “the people”? popular sovereignty and the 2015 Greek referendum. Journal of European Integration, 41(7), 871–885. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1665661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Cuesta, B., & Imai, K. (2016). Misunderstandings about the regression discontinuity design in the Study of Close Elections. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 375–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032015-010115
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. (2009). The impact of EU referenda on national electoral politics: The Dutch case. West European Politics, 32(1), 142–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802509925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. (2017). Benchmarking Brexit: How the British decision to Leave shapes EU public opinion. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(Annual Review), 38–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12579
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, T. (2019). The Promise and Perils of direct democracy: An Introduction. Politics and Governance, 7(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.2267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. J. (2009). Initiated distrust. Direct democracy and Trust in Government. American Politics Research, 37(4), 539–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08330635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehin, P. (2008). Competing models of EU legitimacy: The test of popular expectations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 619–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag, M., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2010). Stumbling block or stepping stone? The influence of direct democracy on individual participation in parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. (2017). Direct democracy and subjective regime legitimacy in Europe. Democratization, 24(4), 613–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1196355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Hutter, S. (2016). Beyond authority transfer: Explaining the politicisation of Europe. West European Politics, 39(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainsworth, P. (2006). France says No: The 29 may 2005 referendum on the European constitution. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsj015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harteveld, E., van der Meer, T., & de Vries, C. E. (2013). In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(4), 542–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116513491018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2006). Direct democracy and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. J., & Tilley, J. (2020). Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of the Brexit referendum. British Journal of Political Science, EarlyView.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, S., & Schulz, T. (2007). ‘Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process’. Review of International Organizations, 2(2), 177–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9020-3
   Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and Observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(04), 765–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemann, L., & Wasserfallen, F. (2016). The democratic effect of direct democracy. American Political Science Review, 110(04), 750–762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000307
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, S., & Kern, A. (2018). ‘The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the effect of direct democracy on citizens’ political support’. Political Behavior, 40(4), 857–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9427-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marthaler, S. (2005). The French referendum on ratification of the eu constitutional treaty, 29 may 2005. Representation, 41(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890508523313
   Google Scholar
• McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkus, L., Deutschmann, E., & Delhey, J. (2018). ‘A Trump effect on the EU’s Popularity? The U.S. Presidential Election as a natural experiment’. Perspectives on Politics, 17(2), 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2006). What Can We learn from the Collapse of the European constitutional project? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 47(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-006-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J., Falcó-Gimeno, A., & Hernández, E. (2020). Unexpected Event during survey design: Promise and Pitfalls for causal inference. Political Analysis, 28(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olken, B. A. (2010). Direct democracy and local public goods: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Political Science Review, 104(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., & Loveless, M. (2010). Macro salience: How economic and political contexts mediate popular evaluations of the democracy deficit in the European union. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H., & König, T. (2002). In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization, 56(2), 447–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802320005531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2020). How the EU-27 public views the Brexit negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S., Dinas, E., Jurado, I., & Konstantinidis, N. (2018). Noncooperation by popular vote: Expectations, foreign Intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum. International Organization, 72(4), 969–994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar