Engaging the disengaged? Explaining the participation of Eurosceptic MEPs in trilogue negotiations

References

• Akkerman, T., & Rooduijn, M. (2015). Pariahs or partners? Inclusion and exclusion of radical right parties and the effects on their policy positions. Political Studies, 63(5), 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asylum Information Database. (2015). Not there yet. An NGO Perspective on Challenges to a Fair and Effective Common European Asylum System. Retrieved January 2020 from http://www.asylumineurope.org/annual-report-20122013.
   Google Scholar
• Bale, T. (2008). Turning round the telescope. Centre-right parties and immigration and integration policy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701847341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baller, I. (2017). Specialists, party members, or national representatives: Patterns in co-sponsorship of amendments in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 18(3), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517712049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerkem, J. (2016). The Norwegian progress party: An established populist party. European View, 15(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0404-8
   Google Scholar
• Blumenau, J., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2018). Never let a good crisis go to waste: Agenda setting and legislative voting in response to the EU crisis. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1086/694543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N. (2017). Opposing Europe in the European Parliament: Rebels and Radicals in the Chamber. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R. (2011). Does bicameralism promote stability? Inter-institutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 34(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2011). The nexus of bicameralism: Rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511410087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2013). The distribution of power among EU institutions: Who wins under codecision and why? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Laloux, T. (2018). Concluding early agreements in the EU: A double principal-agent analysis of trilogue negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, W. M. (2001). Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats. West European Politics, 24(3), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Research Service. (2018). Circular economy package: Four legislative proposals on waste. Retrieved January 2020 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625108.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, D. (2012). Proposal stage coalition-building in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 13(4), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512447013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2016). More integration, less federation: The European integration of core state powers. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1055782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., & Høyland, B. (2010). Bicameral politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2013). Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, D., & Earnshaw, D. (2011). “Relais actors” and co-decision first reading agreements in the European Parliament: The case of the advanced therapies regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.520877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2018). Bicameralism and the balance of power in EU legislative politics. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2019). How populists wage opposition: Parliamentary opposition behaviour and populism in Netherlands. Political Studies, 67(2), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718774717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, D., & Werner, A. (2018). Respectable radicals: Why some radical right parties in the European Parliament forsake policy congruence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1298659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. J. (2017). Contagious Euroscepticism: The impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics, 23(4), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815601787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2001). The radical right in public office: Agenda-setting and policy effects. West European Politics, 24(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. (2011). Explaining the strange decline of the populist radical right Vlaams Belang in Belgium: The impact of permanent opposition. Acta Politica, 46(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2018). The European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2019a). Failing under the ‘shadow of hierarchy’: Explaining the role of the European Parliament in the EU’s ‘asylum crisis’. Journal of European Integration, 41(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1599368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2019b). The European Parliament after the 2019 elections: Testing the Boundaries of the 'cordon sanitaire'. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 15(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v15i4.1121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Panning, L. (2019a). Eurosceptics in trilogue settings: Interest formation and contestation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 42(4), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1575639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Panning, L. (2019b). Preparatory bodies as mediators of political conflict in trilogues: The European Parliament’s shadows meetings. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Trauner, F. (2014). Do supranational EU institutions make a difference? EU asylum law before and after ‘communitarization’. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1142–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.906905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., & Borz, G. (2013). Aggregation and representation in European Parliament party groups. West European Politics, 36(3), 474–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.753706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Stokman, F. N., Achen, C. H., & König, T. (Eds.). (2006). The European Union decides. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F., & Ripoll Servent, A. (2016). The communitarization of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Why institutional change does not translate into policy change. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(6), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Spanje, J., & Graaf, N. D. (2018). How established parties reduce other parties’ electoral support: The strategy of parroting the pariah. West European Politics, 41(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1332328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Spanje, J., & van der Brug, W. (2007). The party as pariah: The exclusion of anti-immigration parties and its effect on their ideological positions. West European Politics, 30(5), 1022–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701617431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R., & Lynch, P. (2014). Understanding the formation and actions of Eurosceptic groups in the European Parliament: Pragmatism, principles and publicity. Government and Opposition, 49(2), 232–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. (2013). Organising the European Parliament: The Role of Committees and Their Legislative Influence. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar