Theorizing policy diffusion: from a patchy set of mechanisms to a paradigmatic typology

References

• Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Stability and change in public policymaking. In C. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 55–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2009). Performing symbolic politics and international environmental regulation: Tracing and theorizing a causal mechanism beyond regime theory. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 81–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galton’s problem’ seriously: Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629806064351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M., Volden, C., Dynes, A. M., & Shor, B. (2017). Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camia, V., & Caramani, D. (2012). Family meetings: Ideological convergence within party families across Europe, 1945–2009. Comparative European Politics, 10(1), 48–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., & Simmons, B. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquharson, K. (2003). Influencing policy transnationally: Pro-and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), 80–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j..2003.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). The politics of policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1245–1256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673–701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. In C. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 135–172). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00179
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, J., González de Reufels, D., Schlichte, K., & Nullmeier, F. (2020). How social policy travels: A refined model of diffusion. Global Social Policy, 20(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018119888443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2014). The power of functionalist extension: How EU rules travel. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), 885–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.910818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2016). Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1400035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2006). Learning and economic policy choices. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 156–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhtarov, F. (2014). Rethinking the travel of ideas: Policy translation in the water sector. Policy & Politics, 42(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 41(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 189–220). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, R., Bischof, D., & Ezrow, L. (2021). How transnational party alliances influence national parties’ policies. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.55
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, A., & Voss, J.-P. (2018). The concept of instrument constituencies: Accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society, 37(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400258644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2007). Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F., Senninger, R., & Bischof, D. (2020). Party policy diffusion in the European multilevel space: What it is, how it works, and why it matters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30(3), 339–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1666403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar