Quick and dirty: how populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states

References

• Akkerman, T. (2018). The impact of radical right parties on immigration in liberal democracies from 1980 until 2013: A look at the Netherlands. Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., & Mueller, S. (2013). Populism and liberal democracy: Populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland. Government and Opposition, 48(3), 343–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., Virginia W., Fiona W., Christian I., Laura K., David W., & Sarah E. (2020). Comparative political data set 1960–2018. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. (2019). Environmental populism: The politics of survival in the anthropocene. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Biard, B., Bernhard, L., & Betz, H.-G. (2019). Do they make a difference? The policy influence of radical right populist parties in Western Europe. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesenbender, S., & Tosun, J. (2014). Domestic politics and the diffusion of international policy innovations: How does accommodation happen? Global Environmental Change, 29, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. (2000). Why there is no ‘southern problem’: On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. (2014). Climate science, populism and the democracy of rejection. In D. A. Crow, & M. T. Boykoff (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future (pp. 129–145). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogany, A., & Cetkovic, S. (2021). Fractionalized but ambitious? Voting on energy and climate policy in the European parliament. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918220
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (1994). The green rainbow: Environmental groups in Western Europe. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damiani, M. (2020). Populist radical left parties in Western Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, C. (2019). The EU’s collective securitisation of climate change. West European Politics, 42(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escartin, A. R. (2020). Populist challenges to EU foreign policy in the southern neighborhood: An informal and illiberal europeanisation? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2019). Climate change and the far right. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(5), e604. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2006). Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gemenis, K., Katsanidou, A., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2012). The politics of anti-environmentalism: Positional issue framing by the European radical right, Paper prepared for the APSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2020). Environmental communication research: Origins, development and new direction. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The far right and the environment: Politics, discourse and communication (pp. 38–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2011). What sceptics believe: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511430459
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A. (2020). The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection. Environmental Politics, 78(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., & Cetkovic, S. (2021). Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. Journal of European Public. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918214 .
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). A drunken guest in Europe? The influence of populist radical right parties on democratic quality. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 10(2), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-016-0302-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA. (2020). Populist government and democracy: An impact assessment using the global state of democracy indice, Working Paper (9).
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2010). The veto player approach in macro-comparative politics: Concepts and measurement. In T. König, M. Debus, & G. Tsebelis (Eds.), Reform processes and policy change: Veto players and decision-making in modern democracies (pp. 43–68). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2018). The politics of environmental performance: Institutions and preferences in industrialized democracies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2021). Party families and greenhouse gas emissions: A new perspective on an old concept. Revised manuscript of the paper presented at the workshop on “The Role of Parties in Environmental Policy”, Göttingen. Retieved October 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. (2007). Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. In M. Jänicke, & K. Jacob (Eds.), Environmental governance in global perspective: New approaches to ecological modernisation (pp. 9–29). Free University of Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. F., & Borchardt, A. (1994). Red and green: Air pollution levels and left party power in OECD countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1068/c120225
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Debus, M., & Heichel, S. (2010). Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970-2000. European Journal of Political Research, 49(3), 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Quéré, C., Korsbakken, J. I., Wilson, C., Tosun, J., Andrew, R., Andres, R. J., Canadell, J. G., Jordan, A., Peters, G. P., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nature Climate Change, 9(3), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0419-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessenki, M. (2019). Taking on climate change: The new east-west divide? European Council on foreign relations. Retrieved January 8, 2020 from https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_taking_on_climate_change_the_new_east_west_divide.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A., & Wagener, O. (2019). The nature of green populism?. Green European Journal. https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/the-nature-of-green-populism/
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• March, L. (2012). Radical left parties in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2015). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2001). The radical right in public office: Agenda-setting and policy effects. West European Politics, 24(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2013). From pariah to policy-maker? The radical right in Europe, west and east: Between margin and mainstream. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2013.766473
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2017). The radical right in Eastern Europe: Democracy under siege? Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Spaargaren, G. (2009). The ecological modernization reader: Environmental reform in theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2014). Fighting the system? Populist radical right parties and party system change. Party Politics, 20(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, & M. Stears (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 493–512). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, T., Troeger, V. E., & Manow, P. (2005). Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. (1996). Environmental policies and problems of European legislation in Southern Europe. South European Society and Politics, 1(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608749608454716
   Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing Public policy. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–107). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2006). Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in latin America. Comparative Politics, 38(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.2307/20433986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.populist.org
   Google Scholar
• Röth, L., Afonso, A., & Spies, D. C. (2018). The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, S., & Carius, A. (2019). Convenient truths: Mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289
   Google Scholar
• Stronberg, J. B. (2018). Populism is bad for the environment: Civil notion. Retrieved June 6, 2019 from https://civilnotionblog.weebly.com/home/populism-is-bad-for-the-environment.
   Google Scholar
• Thalman, E., & Wettenenegel, J. (2019). The story of “climate chancellor” Angela Merkel: Clean energy wire. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/making-climate-chancellor-angela-merkel.
   Google Scholar
• Timbro. (2019). Timbro authoritarian populism index. Retrieved May 7, 2019 from https://timbro.se/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist parties in Europe: Agents of discontent? Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., & Jordan, A. (2021). EU climate and energy governance in times of crisis: Towards a new agenda. Journal of European Public. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918221 .
   Google Scholar
• Wolinetz, S. B., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Absorbing the blow: Populist parties and their impact on parties and party systems. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western College.
   Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M. (2020). Varieties of populist parties and party systems in Europe: From state-of-the-art to the application of a novel classification scheme to 66 parties in 33 countries. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar