869
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Three sides of the same coin? comparing party positions in VAAs, expert surveys and manifesto data

ORCID Icon, , , &

References

  • Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015b). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462931
  • Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, J., Kostelka, F., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Schumacher, G., Steenbergen, M., Vachudova, M., & Zilovic, M. (2015a). ‘1999- 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File. Version 1.13’. Available on Chesdata.eu. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Bakker, R., Jolly, S., & Polk, J. (2020). Multidimensional incongruence, political disaffection, and support for anti-establishment parties. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1701534
  • Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2007). Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008
  • Braun, D., Mikhaylov, S., & Schmitt, H. (2010). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Manifesto Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5057 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10204.
  • Braun, D., & Schmitt, H. (2020). Different emphases, same positions? The election manifestos of political parties in the EU multilevel electoral system compared. Party Politics, 26(5), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818805248
  • Bright, J., Garzia, D., Lacey, J., & Trechsel, A. H. (2016). Europe’s voting space and the problem of second-order elections: A transnational proposal. European Union Politics, 17(1), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515588965
  • Bright, J., Garzia, D., Lacey, J., & Trechsel, A. H. (2020). The representative deficit in different European party systems: An analysis of the European Parliament 2009-2014. Italian Journal of Electoral Studies, 83(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.36253/qoe-9531
  • Bruinsma, B., & Gemenis, K. (2017). Challenging the Manifesto Project data monopoly: Estimating policy position time-series using expert and mass survey data. Paper presented at the 2017 general conference of the European Political Science Association, Milan, 22-24 June, 2017.
  • Castles, F., & Mair, P. (1984). Left-Right political scales: Some expert judgements. European Journal of Political Science, 12(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1984.tb00080.x
  • Curini, L. (2010). Experts political preferences and their impact on Ideological bias: An unfolding analysis based on a benoit-Laver expert survey. Party Politics, 16(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809341051
  • Dinas, E., & Gemenis, K. (2010). Measuring parties’ Ideological positions With manifesto data: A critical evaluation of the competing methods. Party Politics, 16(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809343107
  • Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W., & Winkler, A. (2014). How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12017
  • Fivaz, J., Louwerse, T., & Schwarz, D. (2014). Keeping promises: Voting Advice Applications and political representation. In D. Garzia, & S. Marschall (Eds.), Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective, (pp. 197–216). ECPR Press.
  • Garzia, D., & Marschall, S. (eds.). (2014). Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. ECPR Press.
  • Garzia, D., & Marschall, S. (2019). Voting Advice applications. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia, (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.620
  • Garzia, D., Trechsel, A., & De Sio, L. (2017). Party placement in supranational elections: An introduction to the euandi 2014 dataset. Party Politics, 23(4), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815593456
  • Garzia, D., Trechsel, A., De Sio, L., & De Angelis, A. (2015). Euandi: Project description and datasets documentation. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper.
  • Gemenis, K. (2012). Proxy documents as a source of measurement error in the Comparative Manifestos project. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.002
  • Gemenis, K. (2013a). Estimating parties’ policy positions through voting advice applications: Some methodological considerations. Acta Politica, 48(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.36
  • Gemenis, K. (2013b). What to do (and not to do) with the Comparative Manifestos Project data. Political Studies, 61(1_suppl), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12015
  • Gemenis, K., & van Ham, C. (2014). Comparing methods for estimating parties’ positions in voting advice applications. In D. Garzia, & S. Marschall (Eds.), Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective, (pp. 33–48). ECPR Press.
  • Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x
  • Jalali, C., & Silva, T. (2011). Everyone ignores Europe? Party campaigns and media coverage in the 2009 European Parliament elections. In M. Maier, J. Strömback, & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Political Communication in European Parliamentary Elections, (pp. 111–126). Routledge.
  • Keman, H. (2007). Experts and manifestos: Different sources – same results for comparative research? Electoral Studies, 26(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.004
  • King, G., Koohane, R., & Verba, S. (1995). The importance of research design in political science. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082445
  • Kovar, J., & Kovar, K. (2012). National or european? EP election campaign themes in the news media. European Electoral Studies, 7(1), 30–41.
  • Krouwel, A., & van Elfrinkhof, A. (2014). Combining strengths of methods of party positioning to counter their weaknesses: The development of a new methodology to calibrate parties on issues and ideological dimensions. Quality and Quantity, 48(3), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9846-0
  • Laver, M., & Garry, J. (2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669268
  • Maier, M., Jalali, C., Maier, J., Nai, A., & Stier, S. (2021). When do parties put Europe in the centre? Evidence from the 2019 European Parliament election campaign. Politics, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211008348
  • Mair, P., & Thomassen, J. (2010). Political representation and government in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903465132
  • Marks, G. (ed.). (2007). Special symposium: Comparing measures of party positioning: Expert, manifesto, and survey data. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 1–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.009
  • McDonnell, D., & Werner, A. (2018). Respectable radicals: Why some radical right parties in the European Parliament forsake policy congruence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1298659
  • McDonnell, D., & Werner, A. (2019). Differently eurosceptic: Radical right populist parties and their supporters. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(12), 1761–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1561743
  • Michel, E., Cicchi, L., Garzia, D., Silva, F., & Trechsel, A. (2019). Euandi2019: Project description and datasets documentation. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper.
  • Mikhaylov, S., Laver, M., & Benoit, K. (2017). Coder reliability and misclassification in the human codings of party manifestos. Political Analysis, 20(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr047
  • Morgan, M. J. (1976). The modeling of government coalition formation: A policy-based approach with interval measurement (PhD thesis). Dep. Polit. Sci., Univ. Mich.
  • Reiljan, A., Kutiyski, Y., & Krouwel, A. (2019). Mapping parties in a multidimensional European political space: A comparative study of the EUvox and euandi party position data sets. Party Politics, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812209
  • Reiljan, A., Silva, F., Cicchi, L., Garzia, D., & Trechsel, A. (2020a). Longitudinal dataset of political issue-positions of 411 parties across 28 European countries (2009-2019) from Voting Advice Applications EU Profiler and euandi. Data in Brief, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105968
  • Reiljan, A., Silva, F., Cicchi, L., Garzia, D., & Trechsel, A. (2020b). EU Profiler/euandi trend file (2009-2019), EUI Research Data, 2020, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, [European Governance and Politics Programme].
  • Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2012). The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford University Press.
  • Schäfer, C., & Debus, M. (2018). No participation without representation: Policy distances and abstention in the European Parliament elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1835–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363806
  • Schmitt, H., Braun, D., Popa, S., Mikhaylov, S., & Dwinger, F. (2016a). European Parliament Election Study 2014, Euromanifesto Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA 5162 Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5162.
  • Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S., Popa, S., Teperoglou, E., & European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Monitoring Unit. (2016b). European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, First Post-Election Survey. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 4.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12628.
  • Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S., van der Brug, W., & Popa, S. (2020). European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study’. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7581 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13473.
  • Schwartz, D., Schädel, L., & Ladner, A. (2010). Pre-Election positions and voting behaviour in parliament: Consistency among Swiss MPs. Swiss Political Science Review, 16(3), 533–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00440.x
  • Trechsel, A., & Mair, P. (2011). When parties (also) position themselves: An introduction to the EU profiler. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.533533
  • van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S., Franklin, M., & Sapir, E. (2013). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA 5055 Data file Version 1.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11760.
  • Wagner, M., & Ruusurvirta, O. (2012). Matching voters to parties: Voting advice applications and models of party choice. Acta Politica, 47(4), 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2011.29
  • Walgrave, S., Nuytemans, M., & Pepermans, K. (2009). Voting aid Applications and the effect of statement selection. West European Politics, 32(6), 1161–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903230637

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.