2,202
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Patterns of coordination in the European Commission: an analysis of interservice consultations around climate change adaptation policy (2007–2018)

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. The University of Chicago University Press.
  • Biesbroek, R., & Swart, R. (2019). Adaptation policy at supranational level? Evidence from the European Union. In E. C. H. Keskitalo, & B. Preston (Eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy (pp. 194–211). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Brooks, E., & Bürgin, A. (2020). Political steering in the European Commission: A comparison of the Energy and health sectors. Journal of European Integration, 43(6), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1812063
  • Candel, J. (2019). EU budgetary Politics and Its implications for the bioeconomy. In L. Dries, W. Heijman, R. Jongeneel, K. Purnhagen, & J. Wesseler (Eds.), EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume I (pp. 51–67). Macmillan.
  • Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2018). Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security. Food Security, 10(1), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0752-5
  • Candel, J. J. L., Breeman, G., & Termeer, C. (2016). The European Commission’s ability to deal with wicked problems: An In-depth case study of the Governance of Food security. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(6), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1068836
  • Dreyfus, M., & Patt, A. (2012). The European Commission White Paper on adaptation: Appraising its strategic success as an instrument of soft law. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(8), 849–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9348-0
  • Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022
  • EEA. (2017). Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerability in Europe 2016: an Indicator-Based Report, EEA Report No 01/2017. European Environment Agency.
  • Egenhofer, C., Van Schaik, L., Kaeding, M., Hudson, A., & Ferrer, J. N. (2006). Policy Coherence for Development in the EU Council: Strategies for the Way Forward. Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Finke, D. (2019). Turf wars in government administration: Interdepartmental cooperation in the European commission. Public Administration, 98(2), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12633
  • Goetz, K. H. (2009). How does the EU tick? Five propositions on political time. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802589214
  • Goetz, K. H. (2014). Time and Power in the European commission. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314543436
  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of Economic policymaking in britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
  • Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2014). Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission. Oxford University Press.
  • Hustedt, T., & Seyfried, M. (2016). Co-ordination across internal organizational boundaries: How the EU Commission Co-ordinates climate policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(6), 888–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605
  • IPCC. (2014). Annex II: Glossary.
  • IPCC. (2018). Annex I: Glossary. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor & T. Waterfield (Eds.) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, IPCC.
  • IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A.(eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp.
  • Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford University Press.
  • Kassim, H. (2018). The European Commission as an administration. In E. Ongaro, & S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 783–804). Palgrave.
  • Kassim, H., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Rozenberg, O., & Bendjaballah, S. (2017). Managing the house: The presidency, agenda control and policy activism in the European commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1154590
  • Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/976178
  • Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2015). The European Commission (2nd ed). Palgrave.
  • Ovádek, M., Lampach, N., & Dyevre, A. (2020). What’s the talk in Brussels? Leveraging Daily News coverage to measure issue attention in the European Union. European Union Politics, 21(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520902530
  • Princen, S., & Rhinard, M. (2006). Crashing and creeping: Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600924233
  • Remling, E. (2018). Depoliticizing adaptation: A critical analysis of EU climate adaptation policy. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429207
  • Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy Coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051
  • Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play. Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002
  • Selianko, I., & Lenschow, A. (2015). Energy policy coherence from an intra-institutional perspective: Energy security and environmental policy coordination within the European commission. European Integration Online Papers, 19(2). DOI:10.1695/2015002
  • Senninger, R., Finke, D., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2020). Coordination inside government administrations: Lessons from the EU commission. Governance, 34(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12525
  • Stevens, A., & Stevens, H. (2001). Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union. Palgrave.
  • Stokman, F. N., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van der Knoop, J., & van Oosten, R. C. H. (2000). Strategic decision making. Advances in Group Processes, 17, 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(00)17006-7
  • Stroß, S. (2017). Royal roads and dead ends. How institutional procedures influence the coherence of European Union policy formulation. Journal of European Integration, 39(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1281260
  • Tholoniat, L. (2009). The temporal constitution of the European Commission: A timely investigation. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802589230
  • Trondal, J. (2011). Bureaucratic structure and Administrative behaviour: Lessons from international bureaucracies. West European Politics, 34(4), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.572392