The revolving door in Brussels: a process-oriented approach to employee recruitment by interest organisations

References

• Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albareda, A., & Braun, C. (2019). Organizing transmission belts: The effect of organizational design on interest group access to EU policy-making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J, Hanegraaff, M, & Maloney, W A. (2021). Looking for ‘Voice’ in Business and Citizen Groups: Who’s Being Heard? . Political Studies, p.00323217211019318. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211019318
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Bombardini, M., & Trebbi, F. (2014). Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. American Economic Review, 104(12), 3885–3920. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.12.3885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116504042442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J, & Braun, C. (2014). Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X13000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Fink-Hafner, D., Maloney , W.A., Novak, M, Heylen , F.. (2020). The Comparative Interest Group-survey project: design, practical lessons, and data sets. Interest Groups & Advocacy , 9, 272–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. (2005). Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal, J., Draca, M., & Fons-Rosen, C. (2012). Revolving door lobbyists. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3731–3748. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, M, Peters, B.G. (2012). Rewards for high public office in Europe and North America. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, C. (2012). The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency-interest group interactions. Governance, 25(2), 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2003). Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission: An informational model of forum politics. European Union Politics, 4(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116503004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. W. (2013). Trading information for access: Informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.693411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, J., & Can, V. (2011). Block the revolving door: Why we need to stop EU officials becoming lobbyists (pp. 1–32). ALTER-EU.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Katsaitis, A. (2013). Chameleon pluralism in the EU: An empirical study of the European Commission interest group density and diversity across policy domains. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1104–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Richardson, J. J. (2009). Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors, and issues. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Vannoni, M. (2016). Sliding doors in Brussels: A career path analysis of EU affairs managers. European Journal of Political Research, 55(4), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Vannoni, M. (2018). The strategic management of government affairs in Brussels. Business & Society, 59(4), 612–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318755083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Vannoni, M. (2020). Where Are the revolving doors in Brussels? Sector switching and career progression in EU business–government affairs. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019861360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J E. (1986). The Dynamics of the" Revolving Door" on the FCC. American Journal of Political Science, 689–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111268
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C. (2002). Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union. European Union Politics, 3(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003001002
   Google Scholar
• Eising, R. (2004). Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union. Governance, 17(2), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. (2007). Institutional context, Organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507079542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterling, K. M. (2004). The political economy of expertise: Information and efficiency in American National Politics (2007th ed.). The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., Beyers, J., & Donas, T. (2015). The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils. Political Studies, 63(3), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B, & Halpin, D. (2016). Assessing the composition and diversity of the Australian interest group system. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(4), 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, D., & Yannik, B. (2014). Access all areas: When EU politicians become lobbyists (pp. 1–34). Transparency International EU.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27(15), 2865–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T. (1979). A test of the revolving door hypothesis at the FCC. American Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E. (1996). The state and interest groups in a framework of multi-level decision-making: The case of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 3(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769608407037
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. (2017). Interest Representation in the European Union (4th ed.). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grömping, M, & Halpin, D R. (2019). Does group engagement with members constitute a beneficial inefficiency. Governance, 32(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, D. R., & Fraussen, B. (2017). Conceptualising the policy engagement of interest groups: Involvement, access and prominence. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylen, F, Fraussen, B, & Beyers, J. (2018). Live to fight another day? Organizational maintenance and mortality anxiety of civil society organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 1249–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018788664
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, F, Willems, E, & Beyers, J. (2020). Do professionals take over? Professionalisation and membership influence in civil society organisations, 31(6), 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00214-9
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2012). Informational lobbying in the European Union: The effect of organisational characteristics. West European Politics, 35(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying as a collective enterprise: Winners and losers of policy formulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.699661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., & Finke, B. (2007). The Institutional shaping of EU–Society relations: A contribution to democracy via participation? Journal of Civil Society, 3(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680701775630
   Google Scholar
• LaPira, T. (2014). Lobbying in the shadows: How private interests hide from public scrutiny, and why that matters. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2507300
   Google Scholar
• LaPira, T. M., & Thomas, H. F. (2017). Revolving door lobbying: Public service, private influence, and the unequal representation of interests. University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, J., & McKay, A.. (2012). Consequences of the revolving door: Evaluating the lobbying success of former congressional members and staff . Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 12-15.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, J., McKay, A., & Herbel, L. (2016). Who walks through the revolving door? Examining the lobbying activity of former members of congress. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 5(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2015.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000608
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C., & Baumgartner, F. (2008). Converging perspectives on interest group research in Europe and America. West European Politics, 31(6), 1253–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C., & Beckstrand, M. J. (2011). Following the money: European Union Funding of civil Society organizations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1339–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). In and Out of the revolving door: Making sense of regulatory capture. Journal of Public Policy, 12(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005006
   Google Scholar
• McCrain, J. M. (2019). The value of who you know: Revolving door lobbyists and congressional staff connections. 46.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, F. (1996). Human resources as strategic assets: an evolutionary resource-based theory. Journal of Management studies, 33(6), 757–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Saurugger, S. (2002). Organizational structuring: The case of the European Commission and its external policy responsibilities. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (1997). Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., & Carroll, B. J. (2014). Determinants of upper-class dominance in the heavenly chorus: Lessons from European Union Online consultations. British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, R. H., Johnson, P., Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., & Nelson, R. L. (1989). Who you know versus what you know: The uses of government experience for Washington lobbyists. American Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Zysman, J. (1989). 1992: recasting the European bargaining. World Politics, 95–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010572
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2009). Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. European Political Science Review, 1(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, F., Eichenberger, S., Mach, A., & Varone, F. (2019). More equal than others: Assessing economic and citizen groups’ access across policymaking venues. Governance, 32(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar