Trade shocks and the nationalist backlash in political attitudes: panel data evidence from Great Britain

References

• Adler, D., & Ansell, B. (2020). Housing and populism. West European Politics, 43(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1615322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121–2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2016). The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 205–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2020). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. American Economic Review, 110(10), 3139–3183. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard-Rosa, C., Jensen, A., & Scheve, K. (2021b). Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States. International Studies Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab027
   Google Scholar
• Ballard-Rosa, C., Mashail, M., Rickard, S., & Scheve, K. (2021a). The economic origins of authoritarian values: Evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024296
   Google Scholar
• Bisbee, J., Mosley, L., Pepinsky, T. B., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2020). Decompensating domestically: The political economy of anti-globalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broz, J. L., Frieden, F., & Weymouth, S. (2021). Populism in place: The economic geography of the globalization backlash. International Organization, 75(2), 464–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreras, M., Irepoglu Carreras, Y., & Bowler, S. (2019). Long-term economic distress, cultural backlash, and support for Brexit. Comparative Political Studies, 52(9), 1396–1424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018a). The trade origins of nationalist protectionism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018b). Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018c). ‘The economic determinants of the ‘cultural backlash': globalization and attitudes in Western Europe’. BAFFI CAREFIN Centre Research Paper No. 2018-91. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267139.
   Google Scholar
• Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2019). The surge of economic nationalism in Western Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C. E. (2018). The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: Changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(11), 1541–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1339730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dippel, C., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2015). ‘Globalization and its (dis)-content: trade shocks and voting behavior’. NBER Working Paper 21812.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. M.. (2021). Why does import competition favor Republicans? Localized trade shocks and cultural backlash in the US. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2021.1980898
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Sorkin, I., & Swift, H. (2020). Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586–2624. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, P. and Schwab, J. (2020) ‘Depression of the deprived or eroding enthusiasm of the elites: What has shifted the support for international trade?’, European Journal of Political Economy 64: 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, J. C., Ehrlich, S. D., & Peinhardt, C. (2005). Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization, 59(2), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, J., Lim, J., & Spoon, J. (2019). The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies, 60, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R. K. (2017). How attachments to the nation shape beliefs about the world: A theory of motivated reasoning. International Organization, 71(S1), S61–S84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillen, S., & Steiner, N. D. (2020). The consequences of supply gaps in two-dimensional policy spaces for voter turnout and political support: The case of economically left-wing and culturally right-wing citizens in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). ‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage’. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäkel, I. C., & Smolka, M. (2017). Trade policy preferences and factor abundance. Journal of International Economics, 106, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mader, M., Steiner, N. D., & Schoen, H. (2020). The globalisation divide in the public mind: Belief systems on globalisation and their electoral consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(10), 1526–1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1674906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malgouyres, C. (2017). ‘Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections’. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2017/21. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942173.
   Google Scholar
• Margalit, Y. (2012). Lost in globalization: International economic integration and the sources of popular discontent. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review, 49(6), 1393–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13(1), 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-070220-032416
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics, 54(2), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00094-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayo, M. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research. (2010). British Household Panel Survey: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009. [data collection]. 7th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 5151, http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5151-1.
   Google Scholar
• University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research. (2014). British Household Panel Survey, Waves 1-18, 1991-2009: Conditional Access, Local Authority Districts. [data collection]. 4th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 6027, http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6027-2.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar