Why the European Parliament lost the Spitzenkandidaten-process

References

• Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). The case for demoicracy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2016). After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental change in the EU’s political system? West European Politics, 39(5), 992–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1184414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., & Shackleton, M. (2019). Spitzenkandidaten 2.0: From experiment to routine in European elections? In L. De Sio, M. Franklin, & L. Russo (Eds.), The European Parliament Elections of 2019 (pp. 43–55). Luiss University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B. (2012). The European Parliament as a Driving Force in Informal Institution-Building: The Hard Case of the EP’s Relation with the High Representative for the CFSP. In T. Christiansen, & C. Neuhold (Eds.), International Handbook on Informal Governance (pp. 354–373). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B. (2020). Party-Groups and Ideological Cleavages in the European Parliament After the 2019 Elections. In S. Kritzinger et al. (Eds.), Assessing the 2019 European Elections (pp. 54–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B., & Fossum, J. (2009). The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU. European Political Science Review, 1(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P., (2020). The fall of the Spitzenkandidaten: political parties and conflict in the 2019 European elections. In S. Kritzinger et al. (Eds.), Assessing the 2019 European Elections (pp. 37–53). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• d’Hoore, J., & van Haver, K. (2019). Hoe Macron en Rutte de sprint aantrokken voor meesterknecht Michel, De Tijd, 6 July.
   Google Scholar
• Dinan, D. (2015). Governance and Institutions: The Year of the Spitzenkandidaten. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(S1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12262
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2012). Motion for a resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 110(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the elections to the European Parliament in 2014 (2012/2829(RSP)), B7 0520/2012, Brussels, 20 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2018). ‘Decision on the revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission’, P8_TA(2018)0030, Brussels, 7 February.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2019). Conference of Presidents, Statement, Press Release’, 28 May.
   Google Scholar
• European People’s Party. (2014). Factsheet: The Story of the “Spitzenkandidaten”, June. https://elmarbrok.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/spitzenkandidaten_factsheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007). Introduction: Contested competences in the European Union. West European Politics, 30(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701238741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasone, C., & Lupo, N. (2016). Introduction. Parliaments in the Composite European Constitution. In Ibidem (Ed.), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution (pp. 1–19). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hamřík, L., & Kaniok, P. (2019). Is it all about European Democracy? The Motives behind the Institutionalisation of the Spitzenkandidaten. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 15(4), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v15i4.950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E., & Schade, D. (2020). (Un)settling the precedent: Contrasting institutionalisation dynamics in the spitzenkandidaten procedure of 2014 and 2019. Research & Politics, 7(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020925975
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Meissner, K., Moury, C., & Schoeller, M. (2019). European Parliament Ascendant. Parliamentary Strategies of Self-Empowerment in the EU. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Herszenhorn, D. (2018). Alexander Stubb’s campaign in vain, Politico.eu, 5 November.
   Google Scholar
• Herszenhorn, D., de la Baume, M., & Barigazzi, J. (2019). Last supper of the Spitzenkandidaten, Politico.eu, 8 June.
   Google Scholar
• Herszenhorn, D., Eder, F., de la Baume, M., Momtaz, R., & Barigazzi, J. (2019). How Merkel’s plan for EU top jobs fell apart, Politico.eu, 1 July.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2008). What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. (2019). European conservatives’ Spitzenkandidat dilemma, Politico.eu, 12 June.
   Google Scholar
• Lupo, N. (2020). La forma di governo dell’Unione, dopo le elezioni europee del maggio 2019. In Liber Amicorum per Pasquale Costanzo. Vol. VI – Diritto costituzionale eurounitario e comparazione costituzionale (pp. 25–36). Consulta online. https://www.giurcost.org/COLLANA/6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moury, C. (2007). Explaining the European Parliament's right to appoint and invest the commission. West European Politics, 30(2), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. (2013). European demoicracy and its crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, N. (2014). Juncker given first shot at EU commission job, EUObserver, 27 May.
   Google Scholar
• PES Council. (2011). PES Resolution. Selecting our common candidate in 2014, Brussels, 24 November https://www.pes.eu/export/sites/default/Downloads/PES-Documents/adopted_resolution___selecting_our_common_candidate_in_2014___en.pdf_1258348865.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Put, G.-J., Van Hecke, S., Cunningham, C., & Wolfs, W. (2016). The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties. Selection Procedures Politics and Governance, 4(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raube, K., (2020). From Dawn to Doom: The Institutionalization of the Spitzenkandidaten-Process During European Elections and Its Final Negation. In S. Kritzinger et al. (Ed.), Assessing the 2019 European Elections (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2005). Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic representation beyond the nation state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1148–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600999474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton, M. (2017). Transforming representative democracy in the EU? The role of the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 39(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1277713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2003). Displacement of the Council via informal dynamics? Comparing the Commission and Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 936–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000148379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlake, M. (1998). The European Parliament’s Emerging Powers of Appointment. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(3), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs, W., Put, G.-J., & Van Hecke, S. (2021). Explaining the reform of the Europarties’ selection procedures for Spitzenkandidaten. Journal of European Integration, 43(7), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1876687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar