Re-examining policy stability in climate adaptation through a lock-in perspective

References

• Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I., Murphy, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Changing social contracts in climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, M., Priest, S., McCarthy, S., Penning-Rowsell, E., & Cobbing, P. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of flood & coastal erosion risk governance in England and Wales. FRS17186. Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, W., Gartland, M., & Stack, M. (2004). Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioural lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesbroek, R., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Klostermann, J. E. M., & Kabat, P. (2014). Rethinking barriers to adaptation: Mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Global Environmental Change, 26, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaro, A., de Bel, M., Hinkel, J., Kok, S., Stojanovic, T., & Ware, D. (2020). Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: A public finance perspective. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change (CCC). (2018). Managing the coast in a changing climate. Committee on Climate Change, London.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change (CCC). (2021). Independent assessment of UK climate risk. Advice for Government for the UK’s third Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA3). June 16, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of qwerty. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra. (2012). Principles for Implementing Flood and Coastal Resilience Funding Partnerships. Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Defra. (2018). The national adaptation programme and the third strategy for climate adaptation reporting. July. Defra, London.
   Google Scholar
• Derwort, P., Jager, N. W., & Newig, J. (2021). How to explain major policy change towards sustainability? Applying the multiple streams framework and the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to the German ‘Energiewende.’ Policy Studies Journal. Online first.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. (2005). Can path dependence explain institutional change? Two approaches applied to welfare state reform. MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/2, Max Planck Institute, Cologne, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency (EA). (2020). National flood and coastal erosion risk management strategy for England. Published July 14, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. D., Hepburn, C., Ives, M. C., Hale, T., Wetzer, T., Mealy, P., Rafaty, R., Srivastav, S., & Way, R. (2019). Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. Science, 364(6436), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw7287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Flood Re. (2019). Regulation 27: The Quinquennial Review. July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon, T. J. (2002). Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’ as a barrier to sustainable innovation. Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Galik, C. S., & Chelbi, L. (2021). Revisiting institutional stability: A systematic Review and distillations of dominant modes. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(5), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries, T., & Penning-Rowsell, E. (2011). Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L., Driessen, P. P., Wiering, M., Van Rijswick, H. F., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Matczak, P., Crabbé A., Raadgever G. T., Bakker M. H. N., Priest S. J., Larrue C., & Ek, K. (2016). Toward more flood resilience: Is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward? Ecology and Society, 21(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschhäuser, T., & Hofstede, J. (2020). Meeresspiegelanstieg und die Konsequenzen für den Küstenschutz in Schleswig-Holstein. Hydrographische Nachrichten, 115(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.23784/HN115-02
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2020). Flood and coastal erosion risk management policy statement. July 14, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, J. (2019). On the feasibility of managed retreat in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 23(6), 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-019-00714-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, J. L. A., & Stock, M. (2018). Climate change adaptation in the Schleswig-Holstein sector of the Wadden Sea: An integrated state governmental strategy. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 22(1), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-016-0433-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Process sequencing policy dynamics: Beyond homeostasis and path dependency. Journal of Public Policy, 29(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X09990158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Adger, W. N., Berkhout, F., Massey, E., Mazmanian, D., Munaretto, S., Plummer, R., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2016). The governance of adaptation: Choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special feature. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08797-210337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innenministerium des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. (2010). Landesentwicklungsplan Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Ishtiaque, A., Stock, R., Vij, S., Eakin, H., & Chhetri, N. (2021). Beyond the barriers: An overview of mechanisms driving barriers to adaptation in Bangladesh. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(4), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janipour, Z., de Nooij, R., Scholten, P., Huijbregts, M. A. J., & de Coninck, H.. (2020). What are sources of carbon lock-in in energy-intensive industry? A case study into Dutch chemicals production. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101320. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L., Tunstall, S. M., & Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (2005). Floods as catalysts for policy change: Historical lessons from England and Wales. Water Resources Development, 21(4), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620500258133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H. P., Hole, D. G., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2012). Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2(July), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1463
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9201-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Moore, B. (2020). Durable by design? Policy feedback in a changing climate. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., & Wessberg, N. (2015). The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotilainen, K., Aalto, P., Valta, J., Rautiainen, A., Kojo, M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). From path dependence to policy mixes for Nordic electric mobility: Lessons for accelerating future transport transitions. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 573–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09361-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, T., Gardner, B., Verplanken, B., & Abraham, C. (2015). Habitual behaviors or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. WIRES Climate Change, 6(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.327
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, J. (2003). Institutional stability and change: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 912–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000148360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, E., & Huitema, D. (2016). The emergence of climate change adaptation as a new field of public policy in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0771-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Alexander, M., Matczak, P., Gralepois, M., & Mees, H. L. P. (2018). Typologies of citizen co-production in flood risk governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 89, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MELUND. (2017). Anpassung an den Klimawandel: Fahrplan Für Schleswig-Holstein. Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Digitalisierung des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• MELUND. (2022). Generalplan Küstenschutz des Landes Schleswig- Holstein – Fortschreibung 2022. Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Digitalisierung des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• MELUR. (2013). Generalplan Küstenschutz des Landes Schleswig- Holstein – Fortschreibung 2012. Ministerium für Energiewende, Landesplanung, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• MELUR. (2015). Strategie Für Das Wattenmeer 2100. Ministerium für Energiewende, Landesplanung, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2019). Responding to rising seas: OECD country approaches to tackling coastal risks. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Priest, S., & Johnson, C. (2014). The evolution of UK flood insurance: Incremental change over six decades. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30(4), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2014.903166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reise, K. (2017). Facing the third dimension in coastal flatlands global sea level rise and the need for coastal transformations. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.2.6
   Google Scholar
• Schleswig-Holsteinischer Landtag. (2020). Bericht Der Landesregierung: Gemeinschaftsausgabe ‘Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes‘. Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, N., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). Explaining advocacy coalition change with policy feedback. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 1109–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenhüner, B., Grothmann, T., Huitema, D., Oels, A., Rayner, T., & Turnpenny, J. (2021). Lock-ins in climate adaptation governance. In R. Djalante, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Adaptiveness: Changing Earth System Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 127–146).
   Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy feedback and self-reinforcing and self-undermining processes in EU biofuels policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1132752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trencher, G., Rinscheid, A., Duygan, M., Truong, N., & Asuka, J. (2020). Revisiting carbon lock-in in energy systems: Explaining the perpetuation of coal power in Japan. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101770. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021). Adaptation Gap Report 2021: The gathering storm – Adapting to climate change in a post-pandemic world. Nairobi.
   Google Scholar
• Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Rosenzweig, C., Dawson, R. J., Rodriguez, R. S., Bai, X., Barau, A. S., Seto, K. C., & Dhakal, S. (2018). Locking in positive climate responses in cities. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0100-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2018). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, M. (1993). Politics and jobs: The boundaries of employment policy in the United States. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. M. D., & Russel, D. J. (2018). Climate adaptation in fragmented governance settings: The consequences of reform in public administration. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1386341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar