3,524
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of AI strategies

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bisson, P., Kirkland, R., & Stephenson, E. (2010). The market state. McKinsey & Company.
  • Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
  • Braithwaite, J. (2011). The regulatory state? In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of political science (pp. 1–23). University Press.
  • Brooks, H. (1976). II. Technology assessment in retrospect. Newsletter on Science, Technology & Human Values, 1(4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224397600100403
  • Broussard, M. (2019). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
  • Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Allas, T., Hjartar, K., Manyika, J., Sjatil, P. E., & Shigina, I. (2019). Tech for good. Smoothing disruption, improving well-being. McKinsey Global Institute.
  • Casado-Asensio, J., & Steurer, R. (2014). Integrated strategies on sustainable development, climate change mitigation and adaptation in western Europe: communication rather than coordination. Journal of Public Policy, 34(3), 437–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X13000287
  • Chessen, M. (2017). The Madcom future: How artificial intelligence will enhance computational propaganda, reprogram human culture, and threaten democracy … and What can be done about it, Atlantic Council.
  • Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI. Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
  • Dauvergne, P. (2021). The globalization of artificial intelligence: Consequences for the politics of environmentalism. Globalizations, 18(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1785670
  • Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand-pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021
  • Djeffal, C. (2019a). AI, democracy, and the law. In A. Sudmann (Ed.), The democratization of artificial intelligence: Net politics in the era of learning algorithms (pp. 255–284). transcript Verlag.
  • Djeffal, C. (2019b). Sustainable development of Artificial Intelligence (SAID). Global Solutions Journal, 4, 186–192.
  • Djeffal, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and public governance: Normative guidelines for artificial intelligence in government and public administration. In T. Wischmeyer & T. Rademacher (Eds.), Regulating artificial intelligence (pp. 227–293). Springer Verlag.
  • Ely, A., van Zwanenberg, P., & Stirling, A. (2014). Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: Approaches to enhance international development, coordination and democratisation. Research Policy, 43(3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004
  • Erdelyi, O. J., & Goldsmith, J. (2018). Regulating artificial intelligence proposal for a global solution. In J. Furman, G. Marchant, H. Price, & F. Rossi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 95–101). Association for Computing Machinery.
  • European Commission. (2020a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC (COM(2020) 825 final.
  • European Commission (2020b) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020. Brussels: European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2020
  • Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., & Dawson, G. S. (2020). National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 67, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.07.008
  • Felt, U., & Wynne, B. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously: Report of the expert group on science and governance to the science, economy and society directorate, directorate-general for research, European commission (EUR: Vol. 22700). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006). Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(6), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467606295402
  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A Fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
  • Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2017). A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835
  • Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669
  • Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
  • Hasselbalch, J. A. (2018). Innovation assessment: governing through periods of disruptive technological change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1855–1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363805
  • Hennen, L. (2012). Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?. Poiesis & Praxis, 9(1-2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0122-5
  • Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age. Macmillan.
  • Howlett, M. (2019). The policy design primer. Routledge.
  • Khodabandeh, S., Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Candelon, F., Chu, M., & LaFountain, B. (2020). Expanding AI's impact with organizational learning. MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/expanding-ais-impact-with-organizational-learning/.
  • Kim, Y. T. (2007). The transformation of the East Asian States: From the developmental state to the market-oriented state. Korean Social Science Journal, 59.2, 31–60.
  • Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
  • König, P., Wurster, S., & Siewert, M. B. (2022). Consumers are willing to pay a price for explainable, but not for green AI. Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211069632
  • Kuhlmann, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology: A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006
  • Kvist, J. (2007). Fuzzy set ideal type analysis. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005
  • Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524
  • Mandel, G. N. (2009). Regulating emerging technologies. Law, Innovation and Technology, 1(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2009.11428365
  • Marchant, G., Tournas, L., & Gutierrez, C. I. (2020). Governing emerging technologies through soft law: Lessons for artificial intelligence—an introduction. JURIMETRICS, 61.1, 1–18.
  • Marchant, G. E., & Wallach, W. (2013). Governing the governance of emerging technologies. In G. E. Marchant, K. W. Abbott, & B. Allenby (Eds.), Innovative governance models for emerging technologies, (pp. 136–152). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Demos.
  • Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
  • Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180089. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089
  • OECD. (2019). Artificial intelligence in society. OECD Publishing.
  • Ornetzeder, M., & Kastenhofer, K. (2012). Old problems, new directions and upcoming requirements in participatory technology assessment. Poiesis & Praxis, 9(1-2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0116-3
  • Petrella, S., Miller, C., & Cooper, B. (2021). Russia's Artificial Intelligence strategy: The role of state-owned firms. Orbis, 65(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.11.004
  • Radu, R. (2021). Steering the governance of Artificial Intelligence: National strategies in perspective. Policy and Society, 40(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1929728
  • Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society, 28(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed). Pearson.
  • Sarewitz, D. (2011). Anticipatory governance of emerging technologies. In G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby, & J. R. Herkert (Eds.), The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: The pacing problem (pp. 95–105). Springer Netherlands.
  • Saurwein, F., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2015). Governance of algorithms: Options and limitations. info, 17(6), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0025
  • Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2015). Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12095
  • Simonis, G. (2013). Technology governance. In G. Simonis (Ed.), Konzepte und Verfahren der Technikfolgenabschätzung (pp. 161–186). Springer.
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation & Stilgoe, J. (2019). Monitoring the evolution and benefits of responsible Research and Innovation. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10 .2777/285467.
  • Stilgoe, J., & Guston, D. H. (2017). Responsible research and innovation. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology studies (pp. 853–880). MIT Press.
  • Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of Artificial Intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377
  • Taeihagh, A., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2021). Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392
  • Thierer, A., Castillo O’Sullivan, A., & Russell, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence and public policy. Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
  • Trajtenberg, M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence as the next GPT: A political-economy perspective. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence. An agenda (pp. 175–186). University of Chicago Press.
  • Ulnicane, I., Knight, W., Leach, T., Stahl, B. C., & Wanjiku, W.-G. (2020). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: Insights from AI Policy. Policy and Society, 40.2, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800
  • United Nations General Assembly. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. A/74/486. https://www.undocs.org/A/74/486.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity - a critical History of Social media. Oxford University Press.
  • Van Zwanenberg, P., Ely, A., & Stirling, A. (2009). Emerging technologies and opportunities for international science and technology foresight STEPS Working Paper 30. Brighton: STEPS Centre, 4–13.
  • Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos.
  • World Bank. (2021). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for development on the post-COVID-19 era: A review of national AI strategies and policies. World Bank.
  • Wynne, B. (1975). The Rhetoric of consensus politics: A critical review of technology assessment. Research Policy, 4(2), 108–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(75)90028-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.