Party ideologies and European foreign policy. Examining the transnational foreign policy space

References

• Alemán, E., Calvo, E., Jones, M. P., & Kaplan, N. (2009). Comparing cosponsorship and roll-call ideal points. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, H., Giegerich, B., & Jonas, A. (2013). Introduction. In H. Biehl, B. Giegerich, & A. Jonas (Eds.), Strategic cultures in Europe. Security and defence policies across the continent (pp. 7–17). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Calossi, E., Calugi, F., & Coticchia, F. (2013). Peace and war in the political discourse of Italian Marxist and post-Marxist parties. Contemporary Italian Politics, 5(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2013.848618
   Google Scholar
• Chryssogelos, A.-S. (2015). Patterns of transnational partisan contestation of European foreign policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 20(Issue 2), 227. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2015017
   Google Scholar
• Cicchi, L., Garzia, D., & Trechsel, A. H. (2020). Mapping parties’ positions on Foreign and Security issues in the EU, 2009–2014. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(4), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., & Gajewska, K. (2010). New parliament, new cleavages after the eastern enlargement? The conflict over the services directive as an opposition between the liberals and the regulators. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H., & Manow, P. (2012). Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies (Version 12(10)).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of war and peace. Realism, liberalism, and socialism. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, P., & Mitra, D. (2005). Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, T. (2003). To defect or not to defect? National, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party group cohesion in the European parliament. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 841–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2005). The age of liberal wars. Review of International Studies, 31(S1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, E. (2007). The capitalist peace. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index–revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., & Mello, P. A. (2020). Patterns of political ideology and security policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(4), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2001). Legislative behaviour and party competition in the European Parliament: An application of nominate to the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Lord, C. (1997). Political parties in the European Union. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A. G., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2018). Is there a selection bias in roll call votes? Evidence from the European parliament. Public Choice, 176(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0529-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. C. (2013). European security in NATO's shadow: Party ideologies and institution building. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S., & Martill, B. (2021). The party scene: New directions for political party research in foreign policy analysis. International Affairs, 97(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. (2014). Security and defence policy in the European Union (2nd ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Høyland, B. (2010). Procedural and party effects in European Parliament roll-call votes. European Union Politics, 11(4), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510379925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. (2012). Neorealism: A Structural Approach to CSDP. In X. Kurowska & F. Breuer (Eds.), Explaining the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy: Theory in Action, 16-40. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355729_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. (2018). The common security and defence policy. In H. Meijer & M. Wyss (Eds.), The Handbook of European defence policies and armed forces (pp. 392–406). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. (1995). Thinking about strategic culture. International Security, 19(4), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2002). Power and weakness. Policy Review (113), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., & Delreux, T. (2022). The foreign policy of the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Spoon, J.-J. (2015). Bringing salience back in: Explaining voting defection in the European parliament. Party Politics, 21(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (1999). What affects the European parliaments legislative influence: An analysis of the success of EP amendments. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(3), 521. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Tsebelis, G. (1999). Coalition formation in the European parliament. Comparative Political Studies, 32(8), 933–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032008002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, B. (2008). Are political parties controlling legislative decision-making in the European parliament? The case of the services directive. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(8), 1184–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802407706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley-French, J. (2002). In the shade of Locarno? Why European defence is failing. International Affairs, 78(4), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Working paper. (09/8).
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. D., & Pollins, B. M. (2001). The study of interdependence and conflict: Recent advances, open questions, and directions for future research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(6), 834–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002701045006007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martill, B. (2019). Center of gravity: Domestic institutions and the victory of liberal strategy in cold war Europe. Security Studies, 28(1), 116–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2018.1508636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. J. (2009). The invisible hand of peace: Capitalism, the war machine, and international relations theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H., & Brooks, S. G. (2021). Illusions of autonomy: Why Europe cannot provide for its Security if the United States pulls back. International Security, 45(4), 7–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. O. (2005). Convergence towards a European strategic culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms. European Journal of International Relations, 11(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105057899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V., & Judkins, B. (2004). Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: Is there a left–right divide on trade policy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, M. (2009). The social Market roots of democratic peace. International Security, 33(4), 52–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.33.4.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2012). The comparative study of party-based Euroscepticism: The Sussex versus the North Carolina school. East European Politics, 28(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.669735
   Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, M. (2013). Linking Council and European parliament? Voting unity of national parties in bicameral EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.718889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël, A., & Thérien, J.-P. (2008). Left and right in global politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norrevik, S. (2021). Foreign economic policy in the European Parliament and economic interdependence with foreign powers. European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211035060. forthcoming, 14651165211035060.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, F., & Wagner, W. (2022). Introducing the International Treaty Ratification Votes Database.
   Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., & van der Veer, H. (2016). The eurozone crisis and the European parliament's changing lines of conflict. European Union Politics, 17(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515622567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport, A., & Rathbun, B. (2020). Parties to an alliance: Ideology and the domestic politics of international institutionalization. Journal of Peace Research, 58(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319900916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B. C. (2004). Partisan interventions: European party politics and peace enforcement in the Balkans. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B. C. (2012). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics and American multilateralism (Vol. 121). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., & Wagner, W. (2020). Party politics or (supra-) national interest? External relations votes in the European Parliament. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa018
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., & Wagner, W. (2021). Contestation over development policy in the European parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. (2007). Mainstream Euroskepticism: Trend or Oxymoron? Acta Politica, 42(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, R. N. (1986). The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Russett, B. (1998). A neo-Kantian perspective: Democracy, interdependence, and International Organizations in building Security communities. In E. Adler & M. Barnett (Eds.), Securit Communities (pp. 368–394). Cambrudge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rynning, S. (2003). The European union: Towards a strategic culture? Security Dialogue, 34(4), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010603344007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynning, S. (2011). Realism and the common security and defence policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(1), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, G. (2017). Economics and conflict. Moving beyond conjectures and correlations. In R. Marlin-Bennett (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.84
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. (2020). Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2008). Theorizing party-based Euroscepticism: Problems of definition, measurement, and causality. In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe. The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 238–262). Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Thérien, J.-P., & Noel, A. (2000). Political parties and foreign aid. American Political Science Review, 94(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubowitz, P. & Burgoon, B. (forthcoming). Geopolitics and Democracy: The Western Liberal Order from Foundation to Fracture, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., & Kalandrakis, A. (1999). The European Parliament and environmental legislation: The case of chemicals. European Journal of Political Research, 36(1), 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Putte, L., De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2015). The European parliament as an international actor in trade: From power to impact. In S. Stavridis & D. Irrera (Eds.), he European Parliament and Its International Relations (pp. 52–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, H. (2018). A parliament beyond borders? Parties, nationality, and cooperation in the European Parliament. University of Amsterdam].
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2000). Clashes in the assembly. International Organization, 54(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VoteWatch. (2019). VoteWatch Website. http://www.votewatch.eu/ It is is published in Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (2020). The democratic politics of military interventions. Political parties, contestation and decisions to use force abroad. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Herranz-Surrallés, A., Kaarbo, J., & Ostermann, F. (2018). Party politics at the water’s edge: Contestation of military operations in Europe. European Political Science Review, 10(4), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, G. (2012). Regulating conflict: Historical legacies and state commitment to the laws of war. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G., & Böller, F. (2020). Bomb or build? How party ideologies affect the balance of foreign aid and defence spending. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119883651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, D. M. (2018). The council’s REACH? National governments’ influence in the European parliament. European Union Politics, 19(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518783305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wivel, A. (2005). The Security challenge of small EU member states: Interests, identity and the development of the EU as a Security actor. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(2), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar