References
- Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2001). International ‘standards’ and international governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056013
- Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009a). The Governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In W. Mattli & N. Wood (Eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (pp. 44–88). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830732.44
- Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009b). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42(2), 501–578.
- AI Ethics Lab. (2020, February). Toolbox: Dynamics of AI principles. Retrieved June 30, 2022 from https://aiethicslab.com/big-picture/.
- Amnesty USA. (2020, March 13). Comment on proposed artificial intelligence regulations (3-13-2020). Amnesty, USA. Retrieved October 6, 2022, from https://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/government-relations/advocacy/comment-on-proposed-artificial-intelligence-regulations-3-13-2020/.
- Auld, G. (2014a). Confronting trade-offs and interactive effects in the choice of policy focus: Specialized versus comprehensive private governance. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12034
- Auld, G. (2014b). Constructing private governance: The rise and evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300190533.001.0001
- Auld, G. (2020). Transforming markets? Activists’ strategic orientations and engagement with private governance. Organization & Environment, 33(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618811299
- Austin, M. T., & Milner, H. V. (2001). Strategies of European standardization. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056040
- Barr, A. (2015, July 1). Google mistakenly tags black people as ‘Gorillas,’ showing limits of algorithms. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DGB-42522.
- Bartley, T. (2003). Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Politics & Society, 31(3), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329203254863
- Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 297–351. https://doi.org/10.1086/518871
- Bartley, T. (2021). Power and the practice of transnational private regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471
- Baumgartner, F. R., Green-Pedersen, C., & Jones, B. D. (2006). Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600923805
- Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131866
- Bernauer, T., & Styrsky, V. (2004). Adjustment or voice? Corporate responses to international tax competition. European Journal of International Relations, 10(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104040569
- Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x
- Big Tech. (2022, January 27). How Europe is trying to Rein in Big Tech. Canadian International Governance Initiative. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.cigionline.org/big-tech/how-europe-is-trying-to-rein-in-big-tech/.
- Bryson, J., & Winfield, A. (2017). Standardizing ethical design for artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. Computer, 50(5), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.154
- Burns, C., Clifton, J., & Quaglia, L. (2018). Explaining policy change in the EU: Financial reform after the crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 728–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1301535
- Büthe, T., Djeffal, C., Lütge, C., Maasen, S., & von Ingersleben-Seip, N. (in press). Governing AI: Attempting to herd cats? Journal of European Public Policy, editors’ introduction to the special issue on ‘The Governance of Artificial Intelligence’.
- Büthe, T., & Harris, N. (2011). Codex Alimentarius commission. In T. Hale & D. Held (Eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and innovations (pp. 219–228). Polity Press.
- Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). New Global rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton University Press.
- Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-State authority. Yale University Press.
- Casovan, A., Shankar, V., Brooks, H., Faveri, B., Cairns, S., Dawson, P., Lefaivre, A., Scully, K., & Hererra, R. (2022, February 1). A certification for responsible AI (pp. 1–14). Responsible Artificial Intelligence Institute. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://assets.ctfassets.net/rz1q59puyoaw/6MYkmmV9wk0ZmrBTOluQG7/fd830fcc413fa54290f5bc9dbbd10f0b/The_Responsible_AI_Certification.pdf.
- Cellan-Jones, R. (2014, December 2). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC News. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540.
- Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028459
- Clapp, J. (1998). The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00403004.
- Coglianese, C., & Lazer, D. (2003). Management-based regulation: Prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law & Society Review, 37(4), 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0023-9216.2003.03703001.x
- Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private Authority and International Affairs. State University of New York Press.
- Dauvergne, P. (2020). Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 696–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381
- de Laat, P. B. (2021). Companies committed to responsible AI: From principles towards implementation and regulation? Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1135–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3
- Delacroix, S., Pineau, J., & Montgomery, J. (2021). Democratising the Digital revolution: The role of data governance. In B. Braunschweig & M. Ghallab (Eds.), Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for Humanity (pp. 40–52). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69128-8_3
- Djeffal, C., Siewert, M., & Wurster, S. (2022). Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: A comparative analysis of AI strategies. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094987
- Druetta, C. (2021). AI in the making: Is EU artificial intelligence regulatory framework a good move for European manufacturing? International In-House Counsel Journal, 14(57), 1–10.
- Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-Tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
- Evans, M., & Mathews, A. (2019, October 26). New York Regulator Probes UnitedHealth Algorithm for Racial Bias. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-regulator-probes-unitedhealth-algorithm-for-racial-bias-11572087601.
- Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322068227
- Ford Foundation. (2022). Technology and society: Strategy. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/challenging-inequality/technology-and-society/strategy/.
- Fransen, L. (2011). Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political–institutional analysis of transnational labor standards regulation. Governance, 24(2), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01519.x
- Grabs, J., Auld, G., & Cashore, B. (2021). Private regulation, public policy and the perils of adverse ontological selection. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1183–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12354
- Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton University Press.
- Greenpeace. (2020, May 19). Oil in the cloud: How tech companies are helping big oil profit from climate destruction. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/reports/oil-in-the-cloud/.
- Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2014). Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12005
- Gutierrez, C. I., & Marchant, G. (2021). Soft law governance of artificial intelligence. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jfSgQ7L8iBcfb7jXJQtmKxjzBx0J27Ky9NhIJvOamCk/edit#gid=566110847.
- Hardinges, J. (2018). Defining a ‘data trust.’ Open Data Institute. https://theodi.org/article/defining-a-data-trust/.
- Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00014
- Heaven, W. (2021, February 5). Predictive policing is still racist—whatever data it uses. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/02/05/1017560/predictive-policing-racist-algorithmic-bias-data-crime-predpol.
- Hong, S.-H., Lee, J., Jang, S., & Hwang, H. (2022). Making regulation flexible for the governance of disruptive innovation: A comparative study of AVs regulation in the United Kingdom and South Korea. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096101
- Human Rights Watch. (2021, November 10). How the EU’s flawed artificial intelligence regulation endangers the social safety net: Questions and answers. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/11/10/how-eus-flawed-artificial-intelligence-regulation-endangers-social-safety-net.
- Intel Corporation. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The public policy opportunity. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://community.intel.com/legacyfs/online/files/Intel-Artificial-Intelligence-Public-Policy-White-Paper-2017.pdf.
- ITIC. (2017). ITI AI policy principle. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.itic.org/public-policy/ITIAIPolicyPrinciplesFINAL.pdf.
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
- King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556362
- Kingdon, J. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Pearson.
- Leenders, G. (2019). The regulation of artificial intelligence — a case study of the partnership on AI [MSc International Public Policy, University College London]. https://becominghuman.ai/the-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence-a-case-study-of-the-partnership-on-ai-c1c22526c19f.
- Levy, D., Reinecke, J., & Manning, S. (2016). The political dynamics of sustainable coffee: Contested value regimes and the transformation of sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 364–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12144
- Lewis, J. E., Abdilla, A., Arista, N., Baker, K., Benesiinaabandan, S., Brown, M., Cheung, M., Coleman, M., Cordes, A., Davison, A., Duncan, K., Garzon, S., Harrel, D. F., Jones, P.-L., Kealiikanakaoleohaililani, K., Kelleher, M., Kite, S., Lagon, O., Leigh, J., … Whaanga, H. (2020). Indigenous protocol and artificial intelligence position paper [Monograph]. Aboriginal Territories in Cyberspace, 1–205. https://doi.org/10.11573/spectrum.library.concordia.ca.00986506.
- Manoharan, A. P., & McQuiston, J. (2016). Technology and pedagogy: Information technology competencies in public administration and public policy programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002239
- Marques, J. C., & Eberlein, B. (2021). Grounding transnational business governance: A political-strategic perspective on government responses in the global south. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12356
- Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005). Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance, 18(3), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x
- Matus, K. J. M., & Veale, M. (2022). Certification systems for machine learning: Lessons from sustainability. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12417
- Metz, R. (2020, September 9). Portland passes broadest facial recognition ban in the US. CNN Business. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/09/tech/portland-facial-recognition-ban/index.html.
- Molnar, P., & Gill, L. (2018, September 26). Bots at the Gate: A Human Rights Analysis of Automated Decision Making in Canada’s Immigration and Refugee System. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://citizenlab.ca/2018/09/bots-at-the-gate-human-rights-analysis-automated-decision-making-in-canadas-immigration-refugee-system.
- The New York City Council, New York City’s Administrative Code. (2021). https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4344524&GUID=B051915D-A9AC-451E-81F8-6596032FA3F9.
- Nitzberg, M., & Zysman, J. (2022). Algorithms, data, and platforms: The diverse challenges of governing AI. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096668
- No Tech for Tyrants. (2022). About. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://notechfortyrants.org/about/.
- Obach, B. K. (2015). Organic struggle: The movement for sustainable agriculture in the United States. MIT Press.
- OECD. (2022). National AI policies & strategies. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards.
- Piper, K. (2019, April 4). Exclusive: Google cancels AI ethics board in response to outcry. Retrieved June 30, 2022 from https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/4/4/18295933/google-cancels-ai-ethics-board.
- Prakash, A. (2000). Responsible Care: an assessment. Business & Society, 39(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900204
- Renckens, S., & Auld, G. (2019). Structure, path dependence, and adaptation: North-South imbalances in transnational private fisheries governance. Ecological Economics, 166, 106422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106422
- Russell, A. L. (2014). Open standards and the digital age: History, ideology, and networks. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139856553
- Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (2nd ed). Prentice Hall.
- Sanchez, A., McDermott, K., & Cintora, A. (2019). A policy memorandum to the partnership on AI: Accreditation and educational programs to ensure fairness in AI. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 15(1), 1–8.
- Schiff, D., Borenstein, J., Biddle, J., & Laas, K. (2021). AI ethics in the public, private and NGO sectors: A review of global document collection. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.14109482.v1
- Schleifer, P. (2017). Private regulation and global economic change: The drivers of sustainable agriculture in Brazil. Governance, 30(4), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12267
- SIIA. (2017, September 15). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence and data analytics. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://history.siia.net/Portals/0/pdf/Policy/Ethical%20Principles%20for%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20and%20Data%20Analytics%20SIIA%20Issue%20Brief.pdf?ver=2017-11-06-160346-990.
- SpeakOut. (2019). You are not alone. SpeakOut Tech. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://speakout.tech.
- Spruyt, H. (2001). The supply and demand of governance in standard-setting: Insights from the past. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056022
- Stepken, A. (2021). AI: Regulation as a generator of competitive edge. TIC. https://www.tic-council.org/blog/artificial-intelligence-regulation-generator-competitive-edge.
- Strickland, E. (2022, March 31). Timnit Gebru is building a slow AI movement. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from https://spectrum.ieee.org/timnit-gebru-dair-ai-ethics.
- Tarrow, S. G. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813245
- van der Ven, H. (2015). Correlates of rigorous and credible transnational governance: A cross-sectoral analysis of best practice compliance in eco-labeling. Regulation & Governance, 9(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12092
- Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
- Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
- Yates, J., & Murphy, C. N. (2019). Engineering rules: Global standard setting since 1880. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Zhang, D., Mishra, S., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ganguli, D., Grosz, B., Lyons, T., Niebles, J. C., Sellitto, M., Shoham, Y., Clark, J., & Perrault, R. (2021). The AI Index 2021 Annual Report. AI Index Steering Committee, Human-Centered AI Institute, Stanford University https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.06312.pdf.