The rift between executive contraction and executive detraction: the case of European Commission battery policy-making

References

• Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The differential empowering effects of Europeanization on the autonomy of national agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (2019). The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Kassim, H., & Connolly, S. (2021a). The quiet transformation of the EU Commission cabinet system. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.2003423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Yesilkagit, K., & Becker, S. (2021b). Democratic backsliding and public administration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Trondal, J. (2015). The Palgrave handbook of the European Administrative System. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Peters, B. G. (2011). The Lisbon strategy’s empowerment of core executives: Centralizing and politicizing EU national co-ordination. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.560077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgin, A. (2018). Intra- and inter-institutional leadership of the European Commission President: An assessment of Juncker’s organizational reforms. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgin, A. (2020). The impact of Juncker’s reorganization of the European Commission on the internal policy-making process: Evidence from the Energy Union project. Public Administration, 98(2), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussiére, E., Dujardin, V., Dumoulin, M., Ludlow, P., Brouwer, J. W., & Tilly, P. (2014). The European Commission 1973-86. European Union. 6 May.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzopoulou, S. (2022). Resilience of the silo organizational structure in the European Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies, 1–18.. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2009). Living in the past? Change and continuity in the Norwegian central civil service. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter? Policy and Society, 38(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, L. (1997). Policy-making in the European Union. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, M. (2007). The European Commission 1958-72. European Union. 9 July.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (1999). The impact of bureaucratic structure on policy making. Public Administration, 77(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2004). An organisational approach to European integration: Outline of a complementary perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Sætren, H. (1999). Identities in complex organizations: A study of ministerial bureaucrats. In M. Egeberg & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Organizing political institutions (pp. 93–108). Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy: Effects of agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2017). Researching European Union agencies: What have we learnt (and where do we go from here)? Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2018). An organizational approach to public governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European Commission and European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.976587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001). European governance: A White Paper, Brussels, 25 July.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Europe on the Move – Sustainable Mobility for Europe: Safe, connected and clean, Brussels, 17 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019a). Commission staff working document – On the evaluation of the Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC, Brussels, 9 April.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019b). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank – On the Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan on Batteries: Building a Strategic Battery Value Chain in Europe, Brussels, 9 April.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019c). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The European Green Deal, Brussels, 11 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020a). A proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, Brussels, 10 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020b). Circular economy action plan – For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, Brussels, 11 March.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2011) Access of experts: Information and EU decision-making West European Politics 34.1:48–70 https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. With special reference to government in the United States. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 1–49). Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2013). Linking agenda setting to coordination structures: Bureaucratic politics inside the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 35(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.703663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2014). Which policy for Europe? Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2019). A theory of international organization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2004). The Kinnock reforms in perspective: Why reforming the commission is a heroic, but thankless, task. Public Policy and Administration, 19(3), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670401900304
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Rozenberg, O., & Bendjaballah, S. (2017). Managing the house: The presidency, agenda control and policy activism in the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1154590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., & Laffan, B. (2019). The Juncker presidency: The ‘political commission’ in practice. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12941
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., & Thompson, A. (2013). The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2015). Organizing for ‘wicked problems’ – analyzing coordination arrangements in two policy areas: Internal security and the welfare administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2015-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Verhoest, K.2010). Governance of public sector organizations. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F. (2021). The Political Commissioner. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N. (1997). At the heart of the union. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2010). Governing Through institution building. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ophey, K., & Schwalbach, J. (2022). ‘Bigger’ after all? The effect of structural policy coordination authorities on the multidimensionality of policy output. Journal of Common Market Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled government. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semisovereign people. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat-General. (2021). Annual activity report 2020, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Šefčovič, M., Breton, T., & Sinkevičius, V. (2020). Press conference by Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President of the European Commission, Thierry Breton et Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioners, on battery durability requirements in the EU, European Commission, 10 December.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, R., Finke, D., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2021). Coordination inside government administrations: Lessons from the EU Commission. Governance, 34(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Six, F., & Verhoest, K. (2017). An agenda for further research into the role of trust in regulatory regimes. In F. Six & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Trust in Regulatory Regimes (pp. 224–242). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2007). The public administration turn in integration research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701498061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2011). Bureaucratic structure and administrative behaviour: Lessons from international bureaucracies. West European Politics, 34(4), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.572392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2012). On bureaucratic centre formation in government institutions: Lessons from the European Commission. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312445021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2016). Advances to the study of international public administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veit, S., Hustedt, T., & Bach, T. (2017). Dynamics of change in internal policy advisory systems: The hybridization of advisory capacities in Germany. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9266-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestlund, N. M. (2015). Changing policy focus through organizational reform? The case of the pharmaceutical unit in the European Commission. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714537864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Leyen, U. (2019). A union that strives for more: My agenda for Europe: Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2019 2024. European Union, 9 October.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013). The normalization of the European Commission. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar