Governing AI – attempting to herd cats? Introduction to the special issue on the Governance of Artificial Intelligence

References

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009). The governance triangle. In W. Mattli & N. Woods (Eds.), The politics of global regulation (pp. 44–88). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ada Lovelace Institute. (2022, forthcoming). Inclusive AI governance: Civil society participation in standards development.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. C. (2022). One key challenge for diplomacy on AI? China’s military does not want to talk. Commentary from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Alshadafan, A. (2020). Energy efficiency standards: The struggle for legitimacy. International Journal of Standardization Research, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSR.20200101.oa1
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S., Bostrom, B., & Shulman, C. (2016). Racing to the precipice: A model of artificial intelligence development. AI & Society, 31(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0590-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S., & Pamlin, D. (2015). 12 Risks that threaten human civilization. Global Challenges Foundation. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.pamlin.net/material/2017/10/10/without-us-progress-still-possible-article-in-china-daily-m9hnk.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, G. (2014). Constructing private governance: The rise and evolution of forest, coffee, and fisheries certification. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, G., Casovan, A., Clarke, A., & Faveri, B. (2022). Governing AI through ethical standards: Learning from the experience of other private governance initiatives. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2099449
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, J., Kramar, J., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2019). Guidelines for artificial intelligence containment. In A. E. Abbas (Ed.), Next-generation ethics (pp. 90–112). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., & Mansbridge, J. (2019). Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balleisen, E. J. (2009). Private cops on the fraud beat: American business self-regulation and its discontents, 1895-1932. Business History Review, 83(1), 113–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680500000222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, T. (2018). Rules without rights: Land, labor, and private authority in the global economy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T. (2021). Power and the practice of transnational private regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner, A., & Welsh, S. (2021). An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., King, G., & Zeng, L. (2000). Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture. American Political Science Review, 94(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., & Seamans, R. (2022). The cost of ethical AI development for AI startups. Proceedings of 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society (Oxford, UK), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534195
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. (2022). The power of crisis: How three threats – and our response – will change the world. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D. (2020). Innovation in real places: Strategies for prosperity in an unforgiving world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., & Theodorou, A. (2019). How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence. In M. Toivonen & E. Saari (Eds.), Human-centered digitalization and services: Translational systems sciences (Vol. 19; pp. 305–323). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., & Winfield, A. (2017). Standardizing ethical design for artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. Computer 50(5), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.154
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., & Joshi, R. (2018). Notes from the AI frontier: Modeling the impact of AI on the world economy. McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau, M. C., & Dieuaide, P. (2018). Institutional change and transformations in labour and employment standards: An analysis of ‘grey zones’. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258918775573
   Google Scholar
• Busse, F., & Baeva, G. (2022). Was sind die richtigen Zutaten für vertrauenswürdige Künstliche Intelligenz? Ergebnisse der ZVKI-Online-Befragung: Wissen, Nachvollziehbarkeit und bewertbare Erfahrungen – Zutaten für vertrauenswürdige Künstliche Intelligenz (KI).
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. (2013). Distributional consequences of transnational private regulation: institutional complementarity as a structural source of power in global product and financial markets. Duke University Rethinking Regulation Working Paper no.6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238100
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. (2022). De-Globalisierung in der Standardisierung und Governance digitaler Technologien? In S. A. Schirm, A. Busch, S. Lütz, S. Walter, & H. Zimmermann (Eds.), De-Globalisierung: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven (pp. 279–301). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748932901-279
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, P., Lovato, E., Maronoe, C., Fallacara, L., Mancuso, A., Ricciardi, W., & Specchia, M. L. (2016). The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (2022). Cyber and influence operations. In W. C. Hannas & H. Cheng (Eds.), Chinese power and artificial intelligence: Perspectives and challenges (pp. 189–215). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., & Zeng, J. (2022). Shaping AI’s future? China in global AI governance. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(137), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2107391
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G., & Simpson, S. (2011). The European union, multilateralism, and the global governance of the internet. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.544505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual 'stretching' revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corea, F. (2019). An introduction to data: Everything you need to know about ai, big data and data science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crafts, N. (2021). Artificial intelligence as a general-purpose technology: An historical perspective. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datenethikkommission der Bundesregierung. (2019). Gutachten der Datenethikkommission. https://datenethikkommission.de/wp-content/uploads/191128_DEK_Gutachten_bf_b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Marchi, S., Gelpi, C., & Grynaviski, J. D. (2004). Untangeling neural nets. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMenno, M. B., & Büthe, T. (2022). Voice and influence in global governance: An analytical framework. In J. Pauwelyn, M. Maggetti, T. Büthe, & A. Berman (Eds.), Rethinking participation in global governance: Voice and influence after stakeholder reforms in global finance and health (pp. 31–70). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, J. (2022). Feature translation: China AI venture capital data report (IT Juzi). ChinAI Newsletter #191.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, J., & Dafoe, A. (2021). The logic of strategic assets: From oil to AI. Security Studies, 30(2), 182–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2021.1915583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiNuovo, A. (2018, November 28). Here's how robots can fight loneliness and ageing. World Economic Forum in Focus. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/robot-carers-could-help-lonely-seniors-they-re-cheering-humans-up-already.
   Google Scholar
• Djeffal, C. (2019). AI, democracy, and the law. In A. Sudmann (Ed.), The democratization of artificial intelligence. Net politics in the era of learning algorithms (pp. 255–284). Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Djeffal, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and public governance. Normative guidelines for artificial intelligence in government and public administration. In T. Wischmeyer & T. Rademacher (Eds.), Regulating artificial intelligence (pp. 277–293). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Djeffal, C., Siewert, M. B., & Wurster, S. (2022). Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: A comparative analysis of AI strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094987
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2019). Technological change and international relations. International Relations, 33(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Bächtiger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., Fishkin, J. S., Farrell, D. M., Fung, A., Gutmann, A., Landemore, H., Mansbridge, J., Marien, S., Neblo, M. A., Niemeyer, S., Setälä, M., Slothuus, R., Suiter, J., Thompson, D., & Warren, M. E. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation: Citizens can avoid polarization and make sound decisions. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret, S. (2022). Public preferences for governing AI technology: Comparative Evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11), 1779–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094988
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, J. A. (1992). The limits of reason. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (2019). Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). European Commission digital strategy: A digitally transformed, user-focused and data-driven commission (C(2018) 7118 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). On artificial intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts (COM(2021) 206 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2020). Resolution of 20 October with recommendations to the Commission on civil liability regimes for artificial intelligence (2020/2014 (INL)), Official Journal of the European Union C 404/107.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. (2022a). Draft opinion, 2021/0106(COD). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PA-719827_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs. (2022b). Draft opinion, 2021/0106 (COD). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PA-719827_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2022c). Artificial Intelligence in a digital age. European Parliament resolution of 3 May 2022 on artificial intelligence in a digital age (2020/2266(INI)) (P9_TA(2022) 0140).
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, S. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, M., Kaal, W. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2017). Regulation tomorrow: What happens when technology is faster than the law? American University Business Law Review, 6(3), 561–594. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2834531
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy when the people are thinking: Revitalizing our politics through public deliberation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flonk, D. (2021). Emerging illiberal norms: Russia and China as promoters of internet content control. International Affairs, 97(6), 1925–1944. http://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. In S. Carta (Ed.), Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design (pp. 535–545). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People-An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Warren, M. E. (2011). The participedia project: An introduction. International Public Management Journal, 14(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2011.618309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J., & Seamans, R. (2018). AI and the economy. NBER Working Paper Series no.24689.
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, U., Budish, R., & Ashar, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Development: Module on setting the stage for AI governance – Interfaces, infrastructures, and institutions for policymakers and regulators. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Conferences/GSR/Documents/GSR2018/documents/AISeries_GovernanceModule_GSR18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gill, A. S. (2019). Artificial intelligence and international security: The long view. Ethics and International Affairs, 33(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679419000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabs, J., Auld, G., & Cashore, B. (2021). Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection. Regulation and Governance, 15(4), 1183–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, W. H. (2020). Digital coloniser? China and artificial intelligence in Africa. Survival, 62(6), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1851098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, A. (2015). Democratic international organizations? Normative pressures and decision-making rules. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, D., Vorm, E., Wang, J. Y., & Turek, M. (2021). DARPA's explainable AI (XAI) program: A retrospective. Applied AI Letters, 2(4), e61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ail2.61
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & Li, B. (2018). The application of medical artificial intelligence technology in rural areas of developing countries. Health Equity, 2(1), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamet, P., & Tremblay, J. (2017). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism, 69(Supplement), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbalch, J. A. (2018). Innovation assessment: Governing through periods of disruptive technological change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1855–1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019). The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, E., & Floridi, L. (2022, forthcoming). Artificial intelligence with American values and Chinese characteristics: A comparative analysis of American and Chinese governmental AI policies. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01499-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintze, O. (1975). Military organization and the organization of the state. In F. Gilbert (Ed.), The historical essays of Otto Hintze (pp. 178–215). Oxford University Press. First published in 1906.
   Google Scholar
• HLEG-AI: EU High-level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, J. (2018). Digitalisierung und demokratischer Wandel als Spiegelbilder? In F. Martinsen (Ed.), Wissen – Macht – Meinung. Demokratie und Digitalisierung: Die 20. Hannah-Arendt-Tage 2017 (pp. 14–21). Velbrück Wissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-H., Lee, J., Jang, S., & Hwang, H. (2022). Making regulation flexible for the governance of disruptive innovation: A comparative study of AVs regulation in the United Kingdom and South Korea. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096101
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C. (2016, July 29). Who’ll want artificially intelligent weapons? ISIS, democracies, or autocracies? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. http://thebulletin.org/who’llwant-artificially-intelligent-weapons-isis-democracies-orautocracies9692.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE. (2019). Ethically aligned design – a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrialized society. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ITU: International Telecommunication Union. (2021). AI for good – accelerating the United Nations sustainable development goals. https://aiforgood.itu.int/
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. C. (1997). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson, I. (1996). Liberalism's Crooked Circle. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry, C. F., Meltzer, J. P., Renda, A., Engler, A. C., & Fanni, R. (2021, October). Strengthening International Cooperation on AI: Progress report. Report from the Brookings Institution and Centre for European Policy Studies Forum for Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2022, March 1). How can AI support diversity, equity and inclusion? World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Kinniburgh, F., Selin, H., Selin, N. E., & Schreurs, M. (2022, forthcoming). When private governance impedes multilateralism: The case of international pesticide governance. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12463
   Google Scholar
• Kiron, D., & Unruh, D. (2019). Even If AI can cure loneliness — should It? MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2019). Why parties take up digitization in their manifestos: An empirical analysis of eight western European economies. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(11), 1678–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1544268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, P. D., Wurster, S., & Siewert, M. B. (2022). Consumers are willing to pay a price for explainable, but not for green AI: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis. Big Data and Society, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211069632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leicht-Deobald, U., Busch, T., Schank, C., Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., Wildhaber, I., & Kasper, G. (2019). The challenges of algorithm-based HR decision-making for personal integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04204-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütge, C. (2019). White paper on AI ethics and governance: Building a connected, intelligent and ethical world. https://ieai.mcts.tum.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/White-Paper_AI-Ethics-and-Governance-_March-20201.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lütge, C. (2020). AI ethics and governance: Building a connected, intelligent and ethical world. https://ieai.mcts.tum.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/White-Paper_AI-Ethics-and-Governance-_March-20201.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lütge, C., Poszler, F., Joaquin Acosta, A., Danks, D., Gottehrer, G., Mihet-Popa, N. L., & Naseer, A. (2021). AI4People-ethical guidelines for the automotive sector: Fundamental requirements and practical recommendations. International Journal of Technoethics, 12(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.20210101.oa2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maasen, S., & Sutter, B. (2020). Die Neuerfindung der Soziologie in einer, für eine und mit einer sich digitalisierende(n) Gesellschaft. In S. Maasen & J.-H. Passoth (Eds.), Soziale Welt Sonderband: Vol. 23. Soziologie des Digitalen - Digitale Soziologie? (pp. 73–90). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845295008
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (1993). The sources of social power, vol.2: The rise of classes and nation states, 1760–1914. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (1989). Review of the question of artificial intelligence edited by Brian Bloomfield. Annals of the History of Computing. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/reviews/bloomfield.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html
   Google Scholar
• Meinecke, F. (1948). Schaffender Spiegel: Studien zur Deutschen Geschichtschreibung und Geschichtsauffassung. Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, J. (2021, June). The role of international standards in AI and the geopolitical implications. Brookings. Unpublished manuscript (on file with the corresponding author).
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, J. P., & Tielemans, A. (2022, May). The European Union AI Act: Next steps and issues for building international cooperation. Brookings Institution Policy Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Mertes, S., Huber, T., Weitz, K., Heimerl, A., & André, E. (2022). GANterfactual – counterfactual explanations for medical non-experts using generative adversarial learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligences, 5(4). art. 825565. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.825565
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. (2006). The digital divide: The role of political institutions in technology diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V., & Solstad, S. U. (2021). Technological change and the international system. World Politics, 73(3), 545–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, C. (2022). A guide for making black box models explainable. Lulu Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, L. (2009). Private governance for the public good? Exploring private sector participation in global financial regulation. In H. V. Milner & A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Power, interdependence, and non-state actors in world politics (pp. 126–146). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munck, G. L. (2004). Tools for qualitative research. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools (1st ed., pp. 105–121). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Nield, D. (2019, November 21). A promising solar energy breakthrough just achieved 1,000-degree heat from sunlight. ScienceAlert, Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.sciencealert.com/ai-plus-sunlight-equals-hotter-solar-ovens-and-no-need-for-fossil-fuels.
   Google Scholar
• Nitzberg, M., & Zysman, J. (2022). Algorithms, data, and platforms: The diverse challenges of governing AI. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096668
   Google Scholar
• NSCAI: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence [of the United States]. (2021). Final Report. https://assets.foleon.com/eu-west-2/uploads-7e3kk3/48187/nscai_full_report_digital.04d6b124173c.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). OECD principles on AI. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/.
   Google Scholar
• OECD.AI. (2021, March 1). Database of national AI policies. https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Bessant, J., & Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pagallo, U., Aurucci, P., Casanovas, P., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Schafer, B., & Valcke, P. (2019). On Good AI Governance: 14 priority actions, a S.M.A.R.T. model of governance, and a regulatory toolbox. AI4People. AI4Peoples-Report-on-Good-AI-Governance_compressed.pdf (eismd.eu).
   Google Scholar
• Pauwelyn, J., Maggetti, M., Büthe, T., & Berman, A. (2022). Rethinking Participation in Global Governance: Voice and Influence after Stakeholder Reforms in Global Finance and Health. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renda, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Ethics, governance and policy challenges. Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI and Society, 36(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L. K., & Müller, K.-R. (2019). Explainable AI: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning. Springer. (State-of-the-art survey, 11700).
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleifer, P., Fiorini, M., & Fransen, L. (2019). Missing the bigger picture: A population-level analysis of transnational private governance organizations active in the global south. Ecological Economics, 164(art.106362). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106362
   Google Scholar
• Schönmann, M., Bodenschatz, A., Uhl, M., & Walkowitz, G. (2022). The care-dependent are less averse to care robots: Comparing intuitions of the affected and the non-affected. Munich Papers in Political Economy, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Shadbolt, N., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2016). The rise of social machines. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2516179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146(Feb). art.102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551
   Google Scholar
• Siegmann, C., & Anderljung, M. (2022). The Brussels effect and artificial intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI market. Report from the Centre for the Governance of AI.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, B. (2018). Im toten Winkel. Süddeutsche Zeitung Magazin 51/2018.
   Google Scholar
• TCS: TATA Consultancy Services. (2017). Getting smarter by the day: How AI is elevating the performance of global companies, TCS global trend study: Part 1. Retrieved September 10, 2022. https://www.tcs.com/content/dam/tcs/pdf/Industries/global-trend-studies/ai/TCS-GTS-how-AI-elevating-performance-global-companies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, C. F., Haid, C., Fottner, J., & Büthe, T. (2022). Human autonomy in algorithmic management. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 753–762). https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534168
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, C. J., Niezen, G., O'Kane, A. A., & Stawarz, K. (2015). Can standards and regulations keep up with health technology? JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 3(2), e64. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, & von der Leyen, U. (2019). A union that strives for more: My agenda for Europe: Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2019-2024. Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Von Ingersleben-Seip, N. (2022). Competition and cooperation in artificial intelligence standard setting: Explaining emergent patterns. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Von Ingersleben-Seip, N., & Georgieva, Z. (forthcoming). Old tools for the new economy? Counterfactual causation in foreclosure assessment and choice of remedies on data-driven markets. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2021, June 7). Germany warns: AI arms race already underway. DW News.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, K., Hassan, T., Schmid, U., & Garbas, J.-U. (2019). Deep-Learned faces of pain and emotions: Elucidating the differences of facial expressions with the help of explainable AI methods. Technisches Messen, 86(7–8), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2019-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zysman, J., & Kenney, M. (2017). Intelligent tools and digital platforms: Implications for work and employment. Intereconomics, 52(6), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0699-y
   Google Scholar
• Zysman, J., & Newman, A. L. (2006). How revolutionary was the digital revolution? National responses, market transitions, and global technology. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zysman, J., & Nitzberg, M. (2020). Governing AI: Understanding the limits, possibilities, and risks of AI in an era of intelligent tools and systems. Wilson Center Science and Technology Innovation Program Report.
   Google Scholar