2,493
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fueling opposition? Yellow vests, urban elites, and fuel taxation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aasen, M., & Sælen, H. (2022). Right-wing populism and climate policies: Explaining opposition to road tolls in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103222
  • Aklin, M., & Mildenberger, M. (2020). Prisoners of the wrong dilemma: Why distributive conflict, not collective action, characterizes the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 20(4), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00578
  • Baranzini, A., & Carattini, S. (2017). Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: Testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19(1), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
  • Bechtel, M. M., & Scheve, K. F. (2013). Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(34), 13763–13768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306374110
  • Beiser-McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible? Science Advances, 5(9), eaax3323. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax3323
  • Boasson, E. L., & Tatham, M. (2022). Climate policy: From complexity to consensus?. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2150272
  • Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIRES Climate Change, 9(5), e531. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531
  • Ćetković, S., & Skjærseth, J. B. (2019). Creative and disruptive elements in Norwaýs climate policy mix: The small-state perspective. Environmental Politics, 28(6), 1039–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1625145
  • Conversi, D. (2020). The ultimate challenge: Nationalism and climate change. Nationalities Papers, 48(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.18
  • Conversi, D., & Friis Hau, M. (2021). Green nationalism. Climate action and environmentalism in left nationalist parties. Environmental Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1907096
  • Corre, M. (2018). Qui sont les « gilets jaunes » ? La Croix.
  • Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3471
  • de Comarmond, L. (2018, nov. 17). Mouvement des gilets jaunes: pourquoi la France rurale est en première ligne. Les Echos.
  • Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2020). French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169, 1–19. Article id: 106496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496.
  • Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2022). Yellow vests, pessimistic beliefs, and carbon Tax aversion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200092
  • Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
  • Driscoll, D. (2021). Populism and carbon tax justice: The yellow vest movement in France. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab036
  • Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3
  • Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395–2400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2
  • Julious, S. A. (2004). Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 3(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.126
  • Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2966–2973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
  • Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
  • Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
  • Kester, J., Sovacool, B. K., Noel, L., & Zarazua de Rubens, G. (2020). Rethinking the spatiality of Nordic electric vehicles and their popularity in urban environments: Moving beyond the city?. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102557
  • Kipfer, S. (2019). What colour is your vest? Reflections on the yellow vest movement in France. Studies in Political Economy, 100(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2019.1682780
  • Klenert, D., & Mattauch, L. (2016). How to make a carbon tax reform progressive: The role of subsistence consumption. Economics Letters, 138, 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.11.019
  • Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
  • Knudsen, J. P. (2018). Towards a new spatial perspective – Norwegian politics at the crossroads. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 72(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1445125
  • Kotchen, M. J., Boyle, K. J., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 55, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.058
  • Kulin, J., Johansson Sevä, I., & Dunlap, R. E. (2021). Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environmental Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1898879
  • Kyllönen, S. (2018). Climate change, No-harm principle, and moral responsibility of individual emitters. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(4), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12253
  • Levi, S., Flachsland, C., & Jakob, M. (2020). Political economy determinants of carbon pricing. Global Environmental Politics, 20(2), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00549
  • Lister, R. (2009). A nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 242–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp007
  • Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
  • Marino, E., & Ribot, J. (2012). Special issue introduction: Adding insult to injury: Climate change and the inequities of climate intervention. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.001
  • Martin, M., & Islar, M. (2021). The ‘end of the world’ vs. the ‘end of the month’: Understanding social resistance to sustainability transition agendas, a lesson from the Yellow Vests in France. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00877-9
  • Mayne, Q., & Peters, Y. (2022). Where you sit is where you stand: Education-based descriptive representation and perceptions of democratic quality. West European Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2071044
  • Mehleb, R. I., Kallis, G., & Zografos, C. (2021). A discourse analysis of yellow-vest resistance against carbon taxes. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.08.005
  • Ohlendorf, N., Jakob, M., Minx, J. C., Schröder, C., & Steckel, J. C. (2021). Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 78(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00521-1
  • Orderud, G. I., & Kelman, I. (2011). Norwegian mayoral awareness of and attitudes towards climate change. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 68(5), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2011.587648
  • Rayner, S. (2010). How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(6), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
  • Ridanpää, J. (2021). ‘Carbon footprint nationalism’: Re-conceptualizing Finnish nationalism and national pride through climate change discourse. National Identities, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2021.1937974
  • Salies, E. (2019). Gilets Jaunes: Is the Energy Transition Possible while still Reducing Inequality?, ofce le blog (Vol. 2019).
  • Schaffer, L. M., & Umit, R. (2022). Public support for national vs. international climate change obligations. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2099957
  • Skjervheim, Ø, Høgestøl, A., Bjørnebekk, O., & Eikrem, A. (2020). Norwegian citizen panel 2020, Eighteenth wave methodology report, Norwegian citizen panel: 1-20.
  • Sælen, H., & Kallbekken, S. (2011). A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2181–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.024
  • Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., Noel, L., & de Rubens, G. Z. (2018). The demographics of decarbonizing transport: The influence of gender, education, occupation, age, and household size on electric mobility preferences in the Nordic region. Global Environmental Change, 52, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.008
  • Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., Corner, A. J., Arnold, A., Böhm, G., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Ruddat, M., Scheer, D., & Sonnberger, M. (2017). European perceptions of climate change (EPCC).topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016, EPCC: 72.
  • Stein, J., Buck, M., & Bjørnå, H. (2021). The centre–periphery dimension and trust in politicians: the case of Norway. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1624191
  • Sterner, T. (2012). Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy, 41, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.012
  • Tingley, D., & Tomz, M. (2020). International commitments and domestic opinion: The effect of the Paris agreement on public support for policies to address climate change. Environmental Politics, 29(7), 1135–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1705056
  • Umit, R., & Schaffer, L. M. (2020). Attitudes towards carbon taxes across Europe: The role of perceived uncertainty and self-interest. Energy Policy, 140, 111385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111385
  • Valencia Sáiz, A. (2005). Globalisation, cosmopolitanism and ecological citizenship. Environmental Politics, 14(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500054848
  • Vernet, H., & de Saint Sauveur, C. (2019, mars 20). Qui sont les Gilets jaunes? Portrait-robot de ces Français en colère. Le Parisien.
  • Vona, F. (2019). Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: Why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Climate Policy, 19(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1532871
  • Wanvik, T. I., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Populism, instability, and rupture in sustainability transformations. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(7), 2096–2111. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1866486
  • Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change?. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
  • Wolf, J., Brown, K., & Conway, D. (2009). Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903007377
  • Zürn, M. (2021). How non-majoritarian institutions make silent majorities vocal: A political explanation of authoritarian populism. Perspectives on Politics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721001043

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.