Who cares for the future? Exploring public attitudes towards the needs of future generations in Germany

References

• Armingeon, K., & Bürgisser, R. (2021). Trade-offs between redistribution and environmental protection: the role of information, ideology, and self-interest. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1749715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L., & Huber, R. A. (2018). Assessing the relative importance of psychological and demographic factors for predicting climate and environmental attitudes. Climatic Change, 149(3–4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2260-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, B., & Bürgisser, R. (2022). Public opinion on welfare state recalibration in times of austerity: evidence from survey experiments. Political Science Research and Methods, FirstView. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, B., Di Carlo, D., & Wansleben, L. (2022). The constrained politics of local public investment under cooperative federalism. Socio-Economic Review, FirstView. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R. (2012). Inequality and the political economy of education: An analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., Gandenberger, M., Knotz, C., & Tober, T. (2022). Preferred policy responses to technological change: Survey evidence from OECD Countries. Socio-Economic Review, FirstView Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., Garritzmann, J. L., & Neimanns, E. (2020). A loud, but noisy signal? Public opinion and the politics of education reform in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., & Lober, D. (2020). Between solidarity and self-interest: The elderly and support for public education revisited. Journal of Social Policy, 49(2), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., Rathgeb, P., & Sahm, A. H. J. (2021). Authoritarian values and the welfare state: the social policy preferences of radical right voters. West European Politics, 45(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1886497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., & Rapeli, L. (2021). Immediate rewards or delayed gratificfation? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences. Policy Sciences, 54, 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09408-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronert, A., & Nyman, P. (2022). Electoral opportunism: Disentangling myopia and moderation. APSA Preprints. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-s7h95-v2.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (2017). Impatient politics and social investment: the EU as ‘policy facilitator’. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(8), 1233–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1189451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, J. J. (2020). Varieties of de-carbonization? Comparative political economy and climate change. Socio-Economic Review, 18(1), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz026
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan, J. J. (2022). Institutions, climate change, and the foundations of long-term policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, M., & Koch, M. (2019). Public support for sustainable welfare compared: Links between attitudes towards climate and welfare policies. Sustainability, 11(4146), 4146–4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154146
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, M., Koch, M., Johansson, H., Emilsson, K., Hildingsson, R., & Khan, J. (2021). Habitus and climate change: Exploring support and resistance to sustainable welfare and social-ecological transformations in Sweden. The British Journal of Sociology, 72(4), 874–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, O. W., & Trüdinger, E.-M. (2011). Embellishing welfare state reforms? Political trust and the support for welfare state reforms in Germany. German Politics, 20(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2011.582098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J., Busemeyer, M. R., & Neimanns, E. (2018). Public demand for social investment: New supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 844–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1401107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J. L., & Schwander, H. (2021). Gender and attitudes toward welfare state reform: Are women really social investment promoters? Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720978012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J., Neimanns, E., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Public opinion towards welfare state reform: The role of political trust and government satisfaction. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12501
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against Low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Williams, M. B. (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field Experiment. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1606–1617. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party Choice. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 202–230). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., Kurer, T., & Schwander, H. (2015). High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review, 13(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., Kurer, T., & Traber, D. (2019). The politics of trade-offs: Studying the dynamics of welfare state reform With conjoint experiments. Comparative Political Studies, 52(7), 1059–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and prosperity: Reinventing capitalism through a turbulent century. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2008). The politics of when: Redistribution, investment and policy making for the long term. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the long term: Democracy and the politics of investment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Policy making for the long term in advanced democracies. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-110813-034103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Matthews, J. S. (2012). Why do citizens discount the future? Public opinion and the timing of policy consequences. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 903–935. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Matthews, J. S. (2017). Policy attitudes in institutional context: Rules, uncertainty, and the mass politics of public investment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, O. (2021). Austerity and the path of least resistance: How fiscal consolidations crowd Out long-term investments. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1737957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, N., Muttarak, R., & Schoyen, M. A. (2018). Dividing the pie in the eco-social state: Exploring the relationship between public support for environmental and welfare policies. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417711448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, H. K., & Fritz, M. (2014). Building the Eco-social state: Do welfare regimes matter? Journal of Social Policy, 43(3), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941400035X
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, J. (2018). Political parties and public investments: a comparative analysis of 22 Western democracies. West European Politics, 41(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1344012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulin, J., & Johannson Sevä, I. (2021). Who do you trust? How trust in partial and impartial government institutions influences climate policy attitudes. Climate Policy, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1792822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S., Goerres, A., & Spies, D. C. (2022). Public Attitudes. In D. Béland, K. J. Morgan, H. Obinger, & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed., pp. 329–345). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurer, T., & Häusermann, S. (2022). Automation risk, social policy preferences, and political Participation. In M. R. Busemeyer, A. Kemmerling, P. Marx, & K. Van Kersbergen (Eds.), Digitalization and the welfare state (pp. 139–156). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrance, E. C. (1991). Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy, 99(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/261740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lergetporer, P., Schwerdt, G., Werner, K., West, M. R., & Woessmann, L. (2018). How information affects support for education spending: Evidence from survey experiments in Germany and the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 167(November), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.09.011
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, M. K. (2016). Institutional design and sources of short-Termism. In I. González-Ricoy & A. Gosseries (Eds.), Institutions For future generations (pp. 24–46). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2022). Strategic state capacity: How states counter opposition to climate policy. Comparative Political Studies, 55(3), 493–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimanns, E., Busemeyer, M. R., & Garritzmann, J. (2018). How popular are social investment policies really? Evidence from a survey experiment in eight Western European countries. European Sociological Review, 34(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. (2013). Occupational change in Europe: How technology and education transform the Job structure. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, A., & Gugushvili, D. (2020). Eco-Social divides in Europe: Public attitudes towards welfare and climate change policies. Sustainability, 12(404), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read, D., & Read, N. L. (2004). Time discounting over the lifespan. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004(94), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Röth, L., & Schwander, H. (2021). Greens in government: the distributive policies of a culturally progressive force. West European Politics, 44(3), 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1702792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2019). Who wants what? Redistribution preferences in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, L. M., Oehl, B., & Bernauer, T. (2022). Are policy-makers responsive to public demand in climate politics? Journal of Public Policy, 42(1), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffer, L., Loewen, P. J., Soroka, S., Walgrave, S., & Sheafer, T. (2018). Nonrepresentative representatives: An experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies-Butcher, B., & Stebbing, A. (2016). Climate change and the welfare state? Exploring Australian attitudes to climate and social policy. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315584209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. (2010). Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326232
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. H.-E. (2017). Patience as the rational foundation of sociotropic voting. Electoral Studies, 50(December 2017), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. H.-E. (2018). Patience moderates the class cleavage in demand for redistribution. Social Science Research, 70(February), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.10.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52(February 2016), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.001
   Google Scholar