A widening authority–legitimacy gap in EU regulatory governance? An experimental study of the European Medicines Agency’s legitimacy in health security regulation

References

• Abbott, K. W., Zangl, B., Snidal, D., & Genschel, P. eds. (2020). The Governor’s dilemma: Indirect governance beyond principals and agents. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198855057.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., & Busuioc, M. (2020). Reputation-sourced authority and the prospect of unchecked bureaucratic power. Public Administration Review, n/a(n/a), https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13281
   Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2023). Constructing expertise: The front- and back-door regulation of AI’s military applications in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1230–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, C., & Busuioc, M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement as a conduit for regulatory legitimacy? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1599–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A., & Nørbech, I. (2022). Preserving the old or building the new? Reputation-building through strategic talk and engagement with stakeholder inputs by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 0(0), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2099450
   Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Jevnaker, T. (2022). EU agencies’ stakeholder bodies: Vehicles of enhanced control, legitimacy or bias? Journal of European Public Policy, 29(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1821750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2020a). Meeting expectations in the EU regulatory state? Regulatory communications amid conflicting institutional demands. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1603248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2020b). The promise of bureaucratic reputation approaches for the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1679227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L., Scholte, J. A., Tallberg, J., & Verhaegen, S. (2021). The Elite–Citizen gap in international organization legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., & Smeets, M. (2023). Regulatory cybersecurity governance in the making: The formation of ENISA and its struggle for epistemic authority. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1330–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2173274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O., & Fossum, J. E. (2004). Europe in search of legitimacy: Strategies of legitimation assessed. International Political Science Review, 25(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104045089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Health security and infectious diseases. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/security/overview_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency. (2021). About us. Retrieved from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/about-us/what-we-do.
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency. (2022). COVID-19 vaccines: development, evaluation, approval and monitoring. Retrieved from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/vaccines-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-development-evaluation-approval-monitoring.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, S., & Ruffing, E. (2020). Stakeholder consultations as reputation-building: A comparison of ACER and the German Federal Network Agency. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, T. N. (2020). More power, more control: The legitimizing role of expertise in Frontex after the refugee crisis. Regulation & Governance, n/a(n/a), https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12373
   Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenleer, M. (2014). Agency autonomy actually: Managerial strategies, legitimacy, and the early development of the European union’s agencies for drug and food safety regulation. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 255–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.905416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., & Molander, A. (2019). Epistemic democracy and the role of experts. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-00299-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2019). Emergency powers of international organizations: Between normalization and containment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832935.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Kruck & Weiss. (2023). The regulatory security state in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (1998). Democracy’s time constraints. International Political Science Review, 19(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1997). The new European agencies: Regulation by information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1998). Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The question of standards. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00040
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425284
   Google Scholar
• Maor, M. (2007). A scientific standard and an agency’s legal independence: Which of these reputation protection mechanisms is less susceptible to political moves? Public Administration, 85(4), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00676.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S., Mastenbroek, E., & Schrama, R. (2022). The power of ‘weak’ institutions: Assessing the EU’s emerging institutional architecture for improving the implementation and enforcement of joint policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(10), 1529–1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2125046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., & Rimkutė, D. (2022). Delegation without legitimation? [Data set and code]. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QHTG9 available at osf.io/qhtg9.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., & van Leeuwen, F. (2020). Fairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy. Governance, 33(3), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Braun, C. (2021). Guiding or following the crowd? Strategic communication as reputational and regulatory strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muab008), https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab008
   Google Scholar
• Obendiek, A., & Seidl, S. (2023). The (False) promise of solutionism: Ideational business power and the construction of epistemic authority in digital security governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2022). Clear messages to the European public? The language of European Commission press releases 1985–2020. Journal of European Integration, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2134860
   Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2018). Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs. Public Administration, 96(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2020a). Building organizational reputation in the European regulatory state: An analysis of EU agencies’ communications. Governance, 33(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2020b). Strategic silence or regulatory talk? Regulatory agency responses to public allegations amidst the glyphosate controversy. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1636–1656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2021). European union agencies: Explaining EU agency behaviour, processes, and outputs. In D. Hodson, U. Puetter, S. Saurugger, & J. Petersen (Eds.), The Institutions of the European Union 5th ed. (pp. 203–223). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2022). Expertise and regulatory agencies. In M. Maggetti, F. Di Mascio, & A. Natalini (Eds.), The Handbook on Regulatory Authorities (pp. 486–501). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Wonka, A. (2011). Introduction: Agency governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford University Press. https://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/21979.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., & Wood, M. (2019). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrama, R. (2022). Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency. Regulation & Governance, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2003). Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness?: Network governance and GMO regulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000085333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2022). What Accounts for the Variation in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Eastern, Southern and Western Europe? OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ka2v3.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, A., & Rittberger, B. (2010). Credibility, complexity and uncertainty: Explaining the institutional independence of 29 EU Agencies. West European Politics, 33(4), 730–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402381003794597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (2018). Mapping EU agencies as political entrepreneurs. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (2021). Can independent regulatory agencies mend Europe’s democracy? The case of the European Medicines Agency’s public hearing on Valproate. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13691481211054320, https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211054319
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819974.001.0001.
   Google Scholar