References
- Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2020). Competence: The challenge of governing through intermediaries. In K. W. Abbott, P. Genschel, D. Snidal, & B. Zangl (Eds.), The governor’s dilemma. Indirect governance beyond principals and agents (pp. 3–36). Oxford University Press.
- Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2015). The (Big) data-security assemblage: Knowledge and critique. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715609066
- Autolitano, S., & Pawlowska, A. (2021). Europe’s Quest for Digital Sovereignty: GAIA-X as a Case Study. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2114.pdf.
- Beckert, J. (1996). What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society, 25(6), 803–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159817
- Bellanova, R., & de Goede, M. (2022). Co-producing security: Platform content moderation and European security integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(5), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13306
- Bendiek, S. (2019). Digitale Souveränität für Deutschland in der Cloud: Mehr Abschottung bedeutet weniger Selbstbestimmung. In News Center Microsoft Deutschland. https://news.microsoft.com/de-de/digitale-souveraenitaet-fuer-deutschland-in-der-cloud/
- BMWi. (2019). Project GAIA-X: A federated data infrastructure as the cradle of a vibrant European ecosystem. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/project-gaia-x.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
- BMWi. (2020). Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Dieter Janecek, Tabea Rössner, Dr. Anna Christmann, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN Betr.: Aktueller Umsetzungsstand und offene Fragen zu GAIA-X (BT-Drucksache: 19/22728).
- Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2023). Constructing expertise: The front- and back-door regulation of AI’s military applications in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1230–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174169
- Bodó, B., von Schwichow, H., & Appelman, N. (2020). Money talks? Report on the one-day symposium on the impact of corporate funding on information law research institute for information law research paper. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/47251121/money_talks_summary_report_final.pdf
- Brayne, S. (2021). Predict and surveil: Data, discretion, and the future of policing. Oxford University Press.
- Busemeyer, M. R., & Thelen, K. (2020). Institutional sources of business power. World Politics, 72(3), 448–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388712000009X
- Carrapico, H., & Farrand, B. (2021). When trust fades, Facebook is no longer a friend: Shifting privatisation dynamics in the context of cybersecurity as a result of disinformation, populism and political uncertainty. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(5), 1160–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13175
- Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
- Csernatoni, R. (2020). New states of emergency: Normalizing techno-surveillance in the time of COVID-19. Global Affairs, 6(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1825108
- Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2020). Are we all Amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852687
- De Bolle, C., & Vance, C. R., Jr. (2021). The last refuge of the criminal: Encrypted smartphones. In Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/the-last-refuge-of-the-criminal-encrypted-smartphones-data-privacy/.
- de Goede, M., Bosma, E., & Pallister-Wilkins, P. (2019). Secrecy and methods in security research: A guide to qualitative fieldwork. Routledge.
- Deutsche Telekom AG. (2021). Schrems II an agent thriller? https://www.telekom.com/en/blog/group/article/schrems-ii-an-agent-thriller-616914
- Dunn Cavelty, M., & Smeets, M. (2023). Regulatory cybersecurity governance in the making: The formation of ENISA and its struggle for epistemic authority. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1330–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2173274
- European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission on EU Security Union Strategy COM(2020) 605 final. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication-eu-security-union-strategy.pdf
- European Commission. (2021). Cloud computing | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/cloud-computing
- Farrand, B., & Carrapico, H. (2022). Digital sovereignty and taking back control: From regulatory capitalism to regulatory mercantilism in EU cybersecurity. European Security, 31(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2102896
- Fotiadis, A., Stavinoha, L., Zandonini, G., & Howden, D. (2022). A data “black hole”: Europol ordered to delete vast store of personal data. In The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/10/a-data-black-hole-europol-ordered-to-delete-vast-store-of-personal-data
- Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2017). Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww033
- Gaia-X. (2021). FAQs on the GAIA-X project. https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Redaktion/EN/FAQ/faq-projekt-gaia-x.html
- Goujard, C., & Cerulus, L. (2021). Inside Gaia-X: How chaos and infighting are killing Europe’s grand cloud project. In Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/chaos-and-infighting-are-killing-europes-grand-cloud-project/
- Holst, B., Howden, D., Fotiadis, A., & Stavinoha, L. (2021). Seeing stones: Pandemic reveals Palantir’s troubling reach in Europe. In The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/02/seeing-stones-pandemic-reveals-palantirs-troubling-reach-in-europe
- in’t Veld, S. (2020). Palantir is not our friend. In about:intel. https://aboutintel.eu/palantir-eu-independence/
- Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Process tracing the effects of ideas. In A. Bennett, & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool (pp. 41–73). Cambridge University Press.
- Johnson, C., & Valente, J. (2021). New sovereign controls for GCP via Assured Workloads. In Google Cloud Blog. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/new-sovereign-controls-for-gcp-via-assured-workloads/
- Karp, A. (2022). Interview Series: Palantir CEO Alex Karp spricht über Palantir in Deutschland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNrOWWSbz3A
- Kemmerling, M., & Trampusch, C. (2022). Digital power resources (DPR): The political economy of structural and infrastructural business power in digital(ized) capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac059
- Klynge, C. (2020). 2020 keynote Vice President European Government Affairs, Microsoft. https://blogs.microsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/prod/sites/73/2021/01/GAIA-X-Summit-Casper-Klynge-Keynote-Nov-19-2020-updated.pdf
- Kruck, A. (2016). Resilient blunderers: Credit rating fiascos and rating agencies’ institutionalized status as private authorities. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1127274
- Kruck, A., & Weiss, M. (2023). The regulatory security state in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172061
- Lavorgna, A., & Ugwudike, P. (2021). The datafication revolution in criminal justice: An empirical exploration of frames portraying data-driven technologies for crime prevention and control. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211049670
- Leander, A. (2015). Seen and unseen: Hybrid rule in international security. In S. Hurt, & R. Lipschutz (Eds.), Hybrid rule and state formation: Public-private power in the 21st century (pp. 143–159). Routledge.
- Lewallen, J. (2020). Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: The case of cybersecurity. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1035–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12341
- Martins, B. O., & Jumbert, M. G. (2022). EU border technologies and the co-production of security ‘problems’ and ‘solutions’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(6), 1430–1447. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851470
- Martins, B. O., Lavallée, C., & Silkoset, A. (2021). Drone use for COVID-19 related problems: Techno-solutionism and its societal implications. Global Policy, 12(5), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13007
- Maschmeyer, L., Deibert, R. J., & Lindsay, J. R. (2021). A tale of two cybers – how threat reporting by cybersecurity firms systematically underrepresents threats to civil society. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1776658
- Mehta, J. (2011). The varied roles of ideas in politics: From “whether” to “how”. In D. Béland, & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 23–46). Oxford University Press.
- Mersi, F., & DPA. (2022). Recherche- und Analysesystem der bayerischen Polizei steht in der Kritik. In Stern. https://www.stern.de/politik/bayern–polizei-software-von-palantir-technologies-steht-in-der-kritik-32522368.html
- Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. Public Affairs.
- Mügge, D. (2023). The securitization of the EU’s digital tech regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1431–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171090
- Nachtwey, O., & Seidl, T. (2020). The solutionist ethic and the spirit of digital capitalism. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/sgjzq.
- Palantir. (2021). Trust in data (Palantir explained, #4). In Medium. https://blog.palantir.com/trust-in-data-palantir-explained-4-c2adcdc31325
- Palantir. (2022). Palantir and digital sovereignty: Preserving autonomy in an ever-changing world. In Medium. https://blog.palantir.com/palantir-und-digitale-souver%C3%A4nit%C3%A4t-bewahrung-der-handlungsf%C3%A4higkeit-in-einer-welt-in-bewegung-dd110ca31edf
- Parsons, C. (2007). How to map arguments in political science. Oxford University Press.
- Peterson, M. (2020). What’s next for Europe’s data revolution? AWS joins the GAIA-X initiative. In Amazon Web Services. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/publicsector/what-next-europes-data-revolution-aws-joins-gaia-x-initiative/.
- Seabrooke, L. (2014). Epistemic arbitrage: Transnational professional knowledge in action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jot005
- Seidl, T. (2022). The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York. Regulation & Governance, 16(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12353
- Selling, N. (2021). The long shadow of lobbying: Ideational power of lobbying as illustrated by welfare profits in Sweden. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 10(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00111-6
- Stupp, C. (2019). European cloud project draws backlash from U.S. tech giants. In Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/european-cloud-project-draws-backlash-from-u-s-tech-giants-11572600600.
- Taeihagh, A., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2021). Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392
- Voß, O., & Punz, M. (2021). Zurück aus der Zukunft Die Daten-Cloud Gaia-X ist für den Bund das zentrale Digitalprojekt. Doch nicht mal er nutzt es in großem Stil. In Der Tagesspiegel. https://advance-lexis-com.uaccess.univie.ac.at/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:62WH-H2J1-JCR4-R32R-00000-00&context=1516831.
- Westendarp, L., & O’Brien, P. (2022). Gaia-X board member blames lobbying for project’s gridlock. In Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-lobbying-cloud-project-gaia-x-board-member-says-cloud-project-must-neuter-lobbies-role-to-get-on-track/.
- Willers, J.O. (2021). Experts and markets in cybersecurity: On definitional power and the organization of cyber risks [PhD thesis]. Copenhagen Business School, PhD Series No. 35.2021.