Ripples and their returns: tracing the regulatory security state from the EU to Brazil, back and beyond

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, R. (2018). Hard questions: Where do we draw the line on free expression? Meta. https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/hard-questions-free-expression/.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. (2010). Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue, 41(5), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610382687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2018). Governing others: Anomaly and the algorithmic subject of security. European Journal of International Security, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A. (2019). Changemakers: The industrious future of the digital economy. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entangelment of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickert, M. (2018, April 24). Publishing Our Internal Enforcement Guidelines and Expanding Our Appeals Process. About Facebook.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl, J., Prates, L E, & Amon, J. J. (2021). Supreme Court V. necropolitics: The chaotic judicialization of covid-19 in Brazil. Health and Human Rights, 23(1), 151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2023). Constructing expertise: The front- and back-door regulation of AI’s military applications in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1230–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandino Gonçalvez, G., & Mota Resende, S. (2018). Facebook Retira Rede De Páginas E Perfis Do Ar E Atinge MBL. Folha de Sao Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, B. (2016). The stack: On software and sovereignty. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, N. (2018). The globalization of Facebook: Facebook’s penetration in developed and developing countries. In Media and Power in International Contexts: Perspectives on Agency and Identity. Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. (2008). On "sourcery," or code as fetish. Configurations, 16(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskal, J. (2018). Microsoft Ireland, the CLOUD Act, and international lawmaking 2.0. Stanford Law Review Online, 71, 9. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page? handle=hein.journals/slro71&div=3&g_sent=1&casa_token=Gl_ngZfkxIIAAAAA:cfg_lqxcAXLBamnHuT59g1c0kkhYxoBq5eBzfmqAbI06bg7PZdAEf3ECxxW7LKreyw53UjQSXg&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., & Straubhaar, J. (2020). Producing antipetismo: Media activism and the rise of the radical, nationalist right in contemporary Brazil. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Araújo, M., Rocha, E., De Oliveira, J., De Araújo, K., Da Silva, M., De Ponte, N., De Oliveira, T., Barbosa, D., Alves, P., & De Santos, J. (2021). Fake news knowledge profile in Brazil during the covid-19 pandemic. Research, Society and Development, 10(14), e292101422085.
   Google Scholar
• de Búrca, G. (2020). Introduction to the symposium on the GDPR and international Law. American Journal of International Law, 114(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L., & Musiani, F. (2016). Governance by infrastructure. In F. Musiani, D. L. Cogburn, L. DeNardis, & N. S. Levinson (Eds.), The turn to infrastructure in internet governance (pp. 3–24). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Douek, E. (2019). Facebook's oversight board: Move fast with stable infrastructure and humility. North Carolina Journal Of Law & Technology, 21(1), 1–78. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ncjl21&div=5&g_sent=1&casa_token=wSuij7fJh9UAAAAA:gUQvUjWjy6fCHLn0KeFpCqz22Sb3323oxkP_RlnQxtC8604ZiG_S-Sxr9P4xkg-SFHUk6evBkQ&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., & Smeets, M. (2023). Regulatory cybersecurity governance in the making: The formation of ENISA and its struggle for epistemic authority. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1330–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2173274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterling, K. (2012). We will be making active form. Architectural Design, 82(5), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, S. (2022, March 10). Viral infrastructures: emergency operations centres, site ontology and prefigurative power. Colloquium in International Relations and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• ENISA. (2015). Privacy and data protection by design – from policy to engineering. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., & Bruno, F. (2019). Whatsapp and political instability in Brazil: Targeted messages and political radicalisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2018). Removing spam and inauthentic activity from Facebook in Brazil. About Facebook.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2019, October 9). Statement addressed to Mixed Parliamentary Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fejerskov, A. M. (2017). The new technopolitics of development and the global south as a laboratory of technological experimentation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(5), 947–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917709934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics and the governance of the digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, S. (2018, May 15). Facebook says it deleted 865 million posts, mostly spam. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Theorising and analysing digital labour: From global value chains to modes of production. The Political Economy of Communication, 1(2), 3–27. http://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/19/175
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M., & Goffey, A. (2012). Digital infrastructures and the machinery of topological abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4-5), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Platforms are not intermediaries. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2, 198–216. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gtltr2&div=19&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., & Joinson, A. N. (2020). “It wouldn't happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge analytica scandal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 143, 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias Keller, C. (2020). Policy by judicialisation: The institutional framework for intermediary liability in brazil. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Interview. (2021, December 6). Anna Leander interviewing professor of law with specialization in internet regulation. Zoom.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifidis, P., & Nicoli, N. (2020). The battle to end fake news: A qualitative content analysis of Facebook announcements on how it combats disinformation. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irion, K., Burri, M., Kolk, A., & Milan, S. (2021). Governing “European values” inside data flows: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Internet Policy Review, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, F., & Compton, C. (2022). Data jurisdictions and rival regimes of algorithmic regulation. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12296
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D. (2018). The right tools: Europe's intermediary liability laws and the EU 2016 general data protection regulation. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 33(2), 287–364. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38639K53J.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knoweldge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A., & Weiss, M. (2023). The regulatory security state in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2020). Composing collaborationist collages about commercial security. Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences, 1(1), 73–109. https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10004
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2021a). Locating (new) materialist characters and processes in a theory global governance. International Theory, 13(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297192000041X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2021b). Parsing pegasus: An infrastructural approach to the relationship between technology and Swiss security politics. Swiss Political Science Review, 27(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2009). Code: And other laws of cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, N. (2018). Facebook, Google face first GDPR complaints over ‘forced consent’. Tech Crunch..
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. (2020). Problem spaces: How and why methodology matters. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manso, B. (2020). República das milícias: Dos esquadrões da morte à era Bolsonaro. Todavia.
   Google Scholar
• Mattos, R. (2019). A mobilização política através de vídeos do youtube e facebook: uma análise do Movimento Brasil Livre. Universidade Federal Fluminense.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, T. (2020). A dose of realism: The contestation and politics of cyber norms. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00129-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, P. C. (2020). A Máquina Do Ódio: Notas De Uma Repórter Sobre Fake News E Violência Digital. Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Monsees, L., Liebetrau, T., Austin, J., Burgess, P., Leander, A., & Srivastava, S. (2023). Transversal politics of big tech. International Political Sociology, 17(1). https://academic.oup.com/ips/article/17/1/olac020/6969127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, T. C. (2019). Uma análise da mobilização do movimento brasil livre no Facebook contra as agências de fact-checking lupa, aos fatos e o truco. Universidade do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. (2023). The securitization of the EU’s digital tech regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1431–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. J. (2022). The end of cyber-anarchy?: How to build a new digital order. Foreign Affairs (council. on Foreign Relations), 101(1), 32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obendiek, A., & Seidl, T. (2023). The (False) promise of solutionism: Ideational business power and the construction of epistemic authority in digital security governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oms, J., Moyses, D., Torres, L., & Simão, B. (2019). Acesso móvel à internet: franquia de dados e bloqueio do acesso dos consumidores. Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizza, A., & Aradau, C. (2023). The scripts of security: Agential boundaries, power asymmetries, obduracy. Science Technology & Human Values.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. D. (2015). The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, D., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Digitalsts: A field guide for science and technology studies. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, K., & van Dijk, N. (2022). Privacy engineering and the techno-regulatory imaginary. Social Studies of Science, 56, 853–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221119424.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. (2018, February 5). Using Technology to Remove the Bad Stuff Before It's Even Reported. About Facebook.
   Google Scholar
• Ryngaert, C., & Taylor, M. (2020). The GDPR as global data protection regulation? AJIL Unbound, 114, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2019.80
   Google Scholar
• Safari, B. A. (2016). Intangible privacy rights: How Europe's GDPR will set a new global standard for personal data protection. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(3), 809–848.
   Google Scholar
• Severo, R. G., Gonçalves, S. d. R. V., & Estrada, R. D. (2019). The diffusion network of the school without party project on Facebook and Instagram: Conservatism and reactionarism in the Brazilian conjuncture. Educação & Realidade, 44(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623684073.
   Google Scholar
• Shalders, A. (2018, July 25). Após Remoção Do Facebook, Cúpula Do Mbl Troca Whatsapp Por Telegram E Prepara Ofensiva. BBC News Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Spindler, G., & Schmechel, P. (2016). Personal data and encryption in the European general data protection regulation. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Electronic Commerce Law, 7, 163–177. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jipitec7&div=18&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starosielski, N. (2015). Fixed flow: Undersea cables as media infrastructure. In C. R. Acland, P. Dourish, S. Harris, J. Holt, S. Mattern, T. Miller, C. Sandvig, J. Sterne, H. Tawil-Souri, & P. Vonderau (Eds.), Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures (pp. 53–70). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2019). The age of disruption: Technology and madness in computational capitalism. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2018). Infrastructures in and of ethnography. Anuac, 7(2), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.7340/anuac2239-625X-3519.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. (2022). Law, technology, and data-driven security: Infra-legalities as method assemblage. Journal of Law and Society, 49(S1), S31–S50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12352.
   Google Scholar
• Tazreiter, C. (2015). Lifeboat politics in the pacific: Affect and the ripples and shimmers of a migrant saturated future. Emotion, Space & Society, 16, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, J. (2018). Facebook remove 2,5 milhões de posts com discurso de ódio em 6 meses. Agência Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2019). Guarding public values in a connective world: Challenges for Europe. In O. Boyd-Barrett, & T. Mirrlees (Eds.), Media imperialism: Continuity and change (pp. 175–186). Rowmann & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi, J., Ribes, D., Forlano, L., Loukissas, Y., & Cohn, M. L. (2016). Engaging, designing, and making digital systems. In The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 169–194). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalnieriute, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Internet architecture and human rights: Beyond the human rights gap. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915608948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar