United we stood, divided we transform? Exploring coalition transformation divergence in the EU trade policy field

References

• Araujo, B. M. (2019). Regulating through trade: The contestation and recalibration of EU “deep and comprehensive” FTAs. Pace International Law Review, 31(2).
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, A., Hilary, J., & Lindberg, I. (2014). Trade unions, ‘free trade’, and the problem of transnational solidarity: An introduction. Globalizations, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.860319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Campbell, B. W., Christenson, D. P., & Navabi, Z. (2018). Role analysis using the ego-ERGM: A look at environmental interest group coalitions. Social Networks, 52, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursens, P., & De Bièvre, D. (2023). ‘Seizing the moment: Regional opportunity structures and Wallonia’s temporary veto of the EU–Canada bilateral trade agreement’. Regional & Federal Studies, 33(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.2007477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. (2014). Examining the disconnect between mass mobilizations and international trade union/NGO networks in struggles over bilateral free trade and investment agreements. Globalizations, 11(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.860802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conconi, P., Herghelegiu, C., & Puccio, L. (2021). EU trade agreements: To mix or not to mix, that is the question. Journal of World Trade, 55(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre, D., & Poletti, A. (2020). Towards explaining varying degrees of politicization of EU trade agreement negotiations. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2019). Lobbying strategies and success: Inside and outside lobbying in European Union legislative politics. European Political Science Review, 11(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2007). Global justice movement: Cross-national and transnational perspectives. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Global-Justice-Movement-Cross-national-and-Transnational-Perspectives/Porta-Andretta-Calle-Combes-Porta-Eggert-Giugni-Hadden-Jimenez-Marchetti/p/book/9781594513053 (Accessed: 5 November 2021).
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2015). TTIP: The truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2017). Why TTIP is a game-changer and its critics have a point. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1491–1505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie, D. (2009). Evolving strategies of labor-community coalition-building. Journal of Community Practice, 17(1–2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705420902856233
   Google Scholar
• Duina, F. (2019). Why the excitement? Values, identities, and the politicization of EU trade policy with North America. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(12), 1866–1882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2014). Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwidar, M. A. (2022). Diverse lobbying coalitions and influence in notice-and-comment rulemaking. Policy Studies Journal, 50(1), 199–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2007). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116–152). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch6
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, L. J., & Garcia-Duran, P. (2018). TTIP negotiations: Interest groups, anti-TTIP civil society campaigns and public opinion. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 16(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2018.1450069
   Google Scholar
• Frege, C., Heery, E., & Turner, L. (2003). Comparative coalition building and the revitalization of the labor movement. In IRRA proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting (pp. 122–130). Industrial Relations Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., & Meyer, D. ( (Eds.), 1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 275–290). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987.014
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in west Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 555–596. https://doi.org/10.1086/230049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheyle, N. (2019). Trade policy with the lights on: The origins, dynamics, and consequences of the politicization of TTIP [Doctoral dissertation. Ghent University].
   Google Scholar
• Gheyle, N. (2020). Huddle up! Exploring domestic coalition formation dynamics in the differentiated politicization of TTIP. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheyle, N., & Rone, J. (2022). “The politicisation game”: strategic interactions in the contention over TTIP in Germany. German Politics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2042517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2009). Political opportunities: From tilly to tilly. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 15(2), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00136.x
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, W., & Meyer, D. S. (1993). Competition and cooperation in social movement coalitions: Lobbying for peace in the 1980s. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 38, 157–183.
   Google Scholar
• Heery, E., Williams, S., & Abbott, B. (2012). ‘Civil society organizations and trade unions: Cooperation, conflict, indifference’. Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011426302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016). Explaining durable business coalitions in U.S. politics: Conservatives and corporate interests across America's Statehouses. Studies in American Political Development, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X15000152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilary, J. (2014). European trade unions and free trade: Between international solidarity and perceived self-interest. Globalizations, 11(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.860335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoke, T. T. (2020). Interest groups and lobbying: Pursuing political interests in America (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041795
   Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. (2019). When diversity works: The effects of coalition composition on the success of lobbying coalitions. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. (2020a). Co-operation as currency: How active coalitions affect lobbying success. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(6), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1631377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. (2020b). Synergies in lobbying? Conceptualising and measuring lobbying coalitions to study interest group strategies, access, and influence. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 9(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-019-00077-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Framing by the flock: Collective issue definition and advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 52(4), 483–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, S. (2018). The Europeanisation of interest groups: Beyond access, fit and resources. Journal of European Integration, 40(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1345899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, F., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2017). Introduction: The new EU FTAs as contentious market regulation. Journal of European Integration, 39(7), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Murphy, G. H. (2006). Coalitions of contention: The case of the WTO protests in Seattle. Political Studies, 54(4), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madariaga, A., & Allain, M. (2020). Contingent coalitions in environmental policymaking: How civil society organizations influenced the Chilean renewable energy boom. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 672–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, H., & Van Dyke, N., Eds. (2010). Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., & Czesana, R. (2019). From back rooms to the street? A research agenda for explaining variation in the public salience of trade policy-making in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(12), 1847–1865. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, T., & Baglioni, S. (2022). “Nothing about us without us”: Organizing disabled people’s solidarity within and beyond borders in a polarized age. Social Movement Studies, 21(1–2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1770069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., & Yackee, S. W. (2012). Lobbying coalitions and government policy change: An analysis of federal agency rulemaking. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleart, A. (2021) Framing TTIP in the European public spheres: Towards an empowering Dissensus for EU integration. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53637-4.
   Google Scholar
• Portos, M., & Carvalho, T. (2022). Alliance building and eventful protests: Comparing Spanish and Portuguese trajectories under the great recession. Social Movement Studies, 21(1–2), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1681957
   Google Scholar
• Princen, S., & Kerremans, B. (2008). Opportunity structures in the EU multi-level system. West European Politics, 31(6), 1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802370484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, E. (2005). Coalition building: Trade union dialogues with civil society. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 11(3), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890501100318
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. (2017). Transatlantic investor protection as a threat to democracy: The potency and limits of an emotive frame. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(5–6), 464–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1461805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, N. (2020). New lines within the European civil society mobilizations against the TTIP. New Political Economy, 25(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. (1986). Coalition work in the pro-choice movement: Organizational and environmental opportunities and obstacles. Social Problems, 33(5), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/800657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó, I. G., Golden, D., & Erne, R. (2021). Why do some labour alliances succeed in politicizing Europe across borders? A comparison of the Right2Water and fair transport European citizens’ initiatives. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminga, M. (2017). De vuist van de vakbond: Een recente geschiedenis. De Bezige Bij.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. A., & Motta, R. (2022). Unionism and feminism: Alliance building in the Brazilian Marcha das Margaridas. Social Movement Studies, 21(1–2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1770430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, N., & Amos, B. (2017). Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, 11(7), e12489. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, B.-J. (2022). Embedded neoliberalism and the legitimacy of the post-Lisbon European union investment policy. Politics and Governance, 10(3), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervest, P., van der Pas, H., van Os, Roos, & Knottnerus, R. (2015). Socialising Losses, Privatising Gains: How Dutch investment treaties harm the public interest. TNI. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/socialising-losses-privatising-gains (Accessed: 16 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. (2021). European trade unions and world trade negotiations: The struggle for fair and sustainable trade policies 1973 - 2018. University of Portsmouth. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/european-trade-unions-and-world-trade-negotiations (Accessed: 13 May 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. (2016). ‘Not your parents’ trade politics: The transatlantic trade and investment partnership negotiations’. Review of International Political Economy, 23(3), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1150316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajak, S., Gortanutti, G., Lauber, J., & Nikolas, A-M. (2018). Talking about the same but different? Understanding social movement and trade union cooperation through social movement and industrial relations theories. Industrielle Beziehungen, 25(2), 7–8.
   Google Scholar