Social identities and deadlocked debates on nuclear energy policy

References

• Baker, K., & Stoker, G. (2012). Metagovernance and nuclear power in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(7), 1026–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.652900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandelow, N. C., & Hornung, J. (2019). One discourse to rule them All? Narrating the agenda for labor market policies in France and Germany. Policy and Society, 38(3), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1641379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Last Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., Morales, L., Lühiste, M., & Bischof, D. (2018). The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: A Two-step comparative examination. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouard, S., & Guinaudeau, I. (2015). Policy beyond politics? Public opinion, party politics and the French pro-nuclear energy policy. Journal of Public Policy, 35(1), 137–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X14000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouard, S., & Guinaudeau, I. (2017). Nuclear politics in France. High-profile policy and low-salience politics. In C. M. Wolfgang, & W. T. Paul (Eds.), The politics of nuclear energy in Western Europe (pp. 125–156). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., McHarg, A., McEwen, N., & Turner, K. (2019). How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: The case of post-Brexit UK. Energy Policy, 129, 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., Albright, E. A., Ely, T., Koebele, E., & Lawhon, L. (2018). Do disasters lead to learning? Financial policy change in local government. Review of Policy Research, 35(4), 564–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancey, L., & Goren, P. (2010). Party identification, issue attitudes, and the dynamics of political debate. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas, M., & Heiman, B. (2001). Government credible commitment to the French and American nuclear power industries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(3), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domorenok, E., & Graziano, P. (2023). Understanding the European green deal: A narrative policy framework approach. European Policy Analysis, 9(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1168
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. L. (1986). Public choice theory applied to national energy policy: The case of France. Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006462
   Google Scholar
• Finon, D., & Staropoli, C. (2001). Institutional and technological co-evoluation in the French electronuclear industry. Industry and Innovation, 8(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710120072967
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2015). Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima. Energy Policy, 86, 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flam, H. (1994). States and anti-nuclear movements. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. (2014). The social bases of nuclear energy policies in Europe: Ideology, proximity, belief updating and attitudes to risk. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018, March). A social identity model of Pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genieys, W., & Hassenteufel, P. (2015). The shaping of New state elites: Healthcare policymaking in France since 1981. Comparative Politics, 47(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (2004). Social identity theory and party identification*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubler, A. (2010). The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing. Energy Policy, 38(9), 5174–5188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeckel, E., Kaiser, K., & Lellouche, P. (1980). Nuclear policy in Europe. France, Germany and the international debate. Europa Union Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, C., Hassenteufel, P., & Zittoun, P. (Eds.). (2018). Policy analysis in France. The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenteufel, P., & Genieys, W. (2020). The programmatic action framework: An empirical assessment. European Policy Analysis, 7(S1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1088
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France: Nuclear power and national identity after world War II. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hettel Tidwell, J., & Tidwell, A. (2021). Decarbonizing via disparities: Problematizing the relationship between social identity and solar energy transitions in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, J. (2022). Social identities in climate action. Climate Action, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00005-6
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021). Party identification and cultural theory in Europe – methodologically advancing comparative studies of the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 24(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1891834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2018). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T. S., & Kanie, N. (2012). Japan's post-Fukushima challenge – implications from the German experience on renewable energy policy. Energy Policy, 45, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. (2022). Nuclear Power and Secure Energy Transitions. From today’s challenges to tomorrow’s clean energy systems. Last Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/0498c8b8-e17f-4346-9bde-dad2ad4458c4/NuclearPowerandSecureEnergyTransitions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (1992). Nuclear power, energy policy and new politics in Sweden and Germany. Environmental Politics, 1(3), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019208414032
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (1993). New politics in trade unions: Applying organizational theory to the ecological discourse on nuclear energy in Sweden and Germany. Dartmouth Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D., & Stephan, S. (2015). Germany’s Energiewende after Fukushima: Nuclear politics at the forefront of change. In R. Hindmarsh, & R. Priestley (Eds.), The Fukushima effect (pp. 182–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jetten, J., Fielding, K. S., Crimston, C. R., Mols, F., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Responding to climate change disaster. European Psychologist, 26(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., & Stirling, A. (2020). Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. (1991). Social movements during cycles of issue attention: The decline of the anti-nuclear energy movements in West Germany and the USA. The British Journal of Sociology, 42(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/590834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgensen, C., & Mongin, D. (2018). Résistance et Dissuasion. Des origines du programme nucléaire français à nos jours. Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Kanellakis, M., Martinopoulos, G., & Zachariadis, T. (2013). European energy policy—A review. Energy Policy, 62, 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M., & Lemke, R. (2016). Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing media coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. Political Communication, 33(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1022240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P. (1988). Left-Libertarian parties: Explaining innovation in competitive party systems. World Politics, 40(2), 194–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, W. L. (1968). The French nuclear deterrent. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 29(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1173251
   Google Scholar
• Ladrech, R. (1989). Social movements and party systems: The French socialist party and New social movements. West European Politics, 12(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388908424752
   Google Scholar
• Latré, E., Thijssen, P., & Perko, T. (2019). The party politics of nuclear energy: Party cues and public opinion regarding nuclear energy in Belgium. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P., & Gloaguen, S. (2015). Path-dependence, lock-in, and student perceptions of nuclear energy in France: Implications from a pilot study. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Monde, F. (1955). Institution d’une Commission Consultative pour la production d'électricité d'origine nucléaire. Le Monde. Last Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1955/04/28/institution-d-une-commission-consultative-pour-la-production-d-electricite-d-origine-nucleaire_1959435_1819218.html
   Google Scholar
• LexisNexis. (2022). Nexis Uni. https://nexisuni.com
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. M. L., Schmitt, M. T., Lutz, A. E., & Mendel, J. (2021). Recent developments in the social identity approach to the psychology of climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change – advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, A. S., & Gorski, P. S. (1993). The German left: Red, green and beyond. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2021). We need climate change mitigation and climate change mitigation needs the ‘We’: A state-of-the-art review of social identity effects motivating climate change action. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., Warnement Wrobel, M., & van Woerden, I. (2022). Political ideology and nuclear energy: Perception, proximity, and trust. Review of Policy Research, 40(1), 88–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, N. J., Herron, K. G., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Whitten, G. D. (2007). Elite beliefs, epistemic communities and the Atlantic divide: Scientists’ nuclear policy preferences in the United States and European union. British Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000403
   Google Scholar
• Moyson, S., Fievet, B., Plancq, M., Chailleux, S., & Aubin, D. (2022). Make it loud and simple: Coalition politics and problem framing in the French policy process of hydraulic fracturing. Review of Policy Research, 39(4), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H., Konishi, S., & Nam, K.-W. (2021). Comparative analysis of decision making regarding nuclear policy after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident: Case study in Germany and Japan. Technology in Society, 67, 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, A., Weible, C. M., & Park, K. (2022). Polarization and frames of advocacy coalitions in South Korea's nuclear energy policy. Review of Policy Research, 39(4), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., & Pollak, M. (1980). Political parties and the nuclear energy debate in France and Germany. Comparative Politics, 12(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/421698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D. (2005). External shocks and policy change: Three mile island and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500270729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D. (2008). The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percebois, J. (2003). The peaceful uses of nuclear energy: Technologies of the front and back-ends of the fuel cycle. Energy Policy, 31(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00035-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T. (2002). Green parties in national governments: From protest to acquiescence? Environmental Politics, 11(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., & Marshall, J. P. (2016). Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Policy, 99, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinscheid, A. (2015). Crisis, policy discourse, and major policy change: Exploring the role of subsystem polarization in nuclear energy policymaking. European Policy Analysis, 1(2), 34–70. https://doi.org/10.18278/epa.1.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Rinscheid, A., Eberlein, B., Emmenegger, P., & Schneider, V. (2019). Why do junctures become critical? Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective. Regulation & Governance, 14(4), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R., & Murphy, D. (1998). From competing factions within the green party to the rise of realos. In M. Mayer, & J. Ely (Eds.), The German greens. Paradox between movement and party (pp. 49–71). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roux-Dufort, C., & Metais, E. (1999). Building core competencies in crisis management through organizational learning: The case of the French nuclear power producer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (1990). Campaigns, skirmishes and battles: Anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and west Germany. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4(3), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669000400304
   Google Scholar
• Rüdig, W. (2000). Phasing out nuclear energy in Germany. German Politics, 9(3), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000008404607
   Google Scholar
• Sati, A., Powell, L., & Tomar, V. K. (2022). Natural Gas and Nuclear Power in the EU: If You Can’t Beat Them, Green Them. Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2211473/natural-gas-and-nuclear-power-in-the-eu/2968386/. CID: 20.500.12592/458rqz.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J., Park, C., & Wilding, M. (2015). Identifying policy frames through semantic network analysis: An examination of nuclear energy policy across Six countries. Policy Sciences, 48(1), 51–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9211-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Eder, C. (2020). Public opinion in policy contexts. A comparative analysis of domestic energy policies and individual policy preferences in Europe. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120913047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., Lehtonen, M., & Martiskainen, M. (2011). Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3434–3442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Mišić, M. (2020). Conferring authority in the European Union: Citizens’ policy priorities for the European Energy Union. Journal of European Integration, 42(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trousset, S., Gupta, K., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C. L., & Herron, K. (2015). Degrees of engagement: Using cultural worldviews to explain variations in public preferences for engagement in the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2020). Farm animal welfare policymaking in the European parliament – A social identity perspective on voting behaviour. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(4), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1778458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Burchard, H. (2022). Germany to vote against EU plan to label nuclear as green but won’t sue. Last Retrieved June 2, 2022, from https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-to-veto-eu-plan-to-label-nuclear-energy-as-green-european-commission/
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2019). Sharpening advocacy coalitions. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 1054–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2020). Bringing agency back into the study of partisan politics: A note on recent developments in the literature on party politics. Party Politics, 27(5), 1055–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820919316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2020). Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization. Political Behavior, 44, 807–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliarty, S. E. (2013). Nuclear power in Germany and France. Polity, 45(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2013.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittneben, B. B. F. (2012). The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xexakis, G., & Trutnevyte, E. (2021). Empirical testing of the visualizations of climate change mitigation scenarios with citizens: A comparison Among Germany, Poland, and France. Global Environmental Change, 70, 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, R., & Engler, F. (2014). Courting the voters? Policy implications of party competition for the reform output of the Second Merkel Government. German Politics, 23(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2014.967223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, R., & Tosun, J. (2019). Policy styles in Germany. Still searching for the rationalist consensus? In M. Howlett, & J. Tosun (Eds.), Policy styles and policy-making. Exploring the linkages (pp. 45–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar