414
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Beyond Power and Puzzling: The Political Dimensions of Policy Learning. Guest Editors: Claire Dunlop, Claudio Radaelli, Ellen Wayenberg and Bishoy Zaki

Diagnosing individual barriers to collective learning: how governance contexts shape cognitive biases

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 2026-2049 | Received 08 Feb 2023, Accepted 20 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

References

  • Alesina, A., & Passarelli, F. (2019). Loss aversion in politics. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 936–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12440
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1979
  • Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
  • Beem, B. (2012). Learning the wrong lessons? Science and fisheries management in the Chesapeake Bay blue crab fishery. Public Understanding of Science, 21(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510374177
  • Béland, D. (2006). The politics of social learning: Finance, institutions, and pension reform in the United States and Canada. Governance, 19(4), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00340.x
  • Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P., & Belardinelli, P. (2017). Cognitive biases in performance appraisal: Experimental evidence on anchoring and halo effects with public sector managers and employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17704891
  • Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005
  • Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114, 1–8.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
  • Busetti, S., & Righettini, M. S. (2023). Policy learning from crises: Lessons learned from the Italian food stamp programme. Policy & Politics, 51(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16678318518550
  • Casady, C. B., & Parra, J. D. (2021). Structural impediments to policy learning: Lessons from Colombia’s road concession programs. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(5), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1724142
  • Christiansen, A. C., & Tangen, K. (2002). The shadow of the past: Environmental issues and institutional learning in EU enlargement processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 4(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.97
  • Crow, D. A., & Albright, E. A. (2019). Intergovernmental relationships after disaster: State and local government learning during flood recovery in Colorado. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623660
  • DeCaro, D. A., Arnold, C. A., Boamah, E. F., & Garmestani, A. S. (2017). Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09154-220133
  • Deverell, E. (2009). Crises as learning triggers: Exploring a conceptual framework of crisis-induced learning. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00578.x
  • De Voogt, D., & Patterson, J. J. (2019). Exogenous factors in collective policy learning: The case of municipal flood risk governance in The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623662
  • Dieguez, L., & Sotirov, M. (2021). FSC sustainability certification as green-lane for legality verification under the EUTR? Changes and policy learning at the interplay of private governance and public policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 131(102568), 1–9.
  • Di Giulio, M., & Vecchi, G. (2019). Multilevel policy implementation and the where of learning: The case of the information system for school buildings in Italy. Policy Sciences, 52(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9326-4
  • Dunlop, C. A. (2014). The possible experts: How epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1068/c13192j
  • Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematizing policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x
  • Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2020). The lessons of policy learning: Types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230059735521
  • Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2022). Policy learning in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 24(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1762077
  • Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098
  • Fischer, M., & Leifeld, P. (2015). Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences, 48(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y
  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  • Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq089
  • Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., & Newig, J. (2020). Learning in environmental governance: Opportunities for translating theory to practice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1776100
  • Goyal, N., & Howlett, M. (2019). Framework or metaphor? Analysing the status of policy learning in the policy sciences. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1493768
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609
  • Guilbeault, D., Becker, J., & Centola, D. (2018). Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 9714–9719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722664115
  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
  • Heikkila, T., & Cairney, P. (2018). Comparison of theories of the policy process. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 301–327). Routledge.
  • Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12026
  • Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2022). Learning. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd Ed., pp. 244–253). Edward Elgar.
  • Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Gerlak, A. K. (2020). When does science persuade (or not persuade) in high conflict policy contexts? Public Administration, 98(3), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12655
  • Henry, A. D. (2009). The challenge of learning for sustainability: A prolegomenon to theory. Human Ecology Review, 131–140.
  • Hofmann, B., Ingold, K., Stamm, C., Ammann, P., Eggen, R. I., Finger, R., Fuhrimann, S., Lienert, J., Mark, J., McCallum, C., Probst-Hensch, N., Reber, U., Tamm, L., Wiget, M., Winkler, M. S., Zachmann, L., & Hoffmann, S. (2023). Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice. Ambio, 52(2), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01790-4
  • Huijbregts, R., George, B., & Bekkers, V. (2022). Valuation tools and politicians’ willingness to sell public real estate: a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 24(6), 882–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1874496
  • Iwasa, F. T., & de Almeida, F. C. (2021). Behavioural public administration: A systematic review on the effects of cognitive biases on public administration decisions. Revista Expectativa, 20(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.48075/revex.v20i1.26838
  • Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C. L., Gupta, K., & Ripberger, J. T. (2014). Belief system continuity and change in policy advocacy coalitions: Using cultural theory to specify belief systems, coalitions, and sources of change. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12071
  • Jiggins, J., Van Slobbe, E., & Röling, N. (2007). The organization of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.006
  • Kamkhaji, J. C., & Radaelli, C. M. (2017). Crisis, learning and policy change in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 714–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1164744
  • Koebele, E. A. (2019). Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623661
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Lagadec, P. (1997). Learning processes for crisis management in complex organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00034
  • Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505183X
  • Leach, W. D., Weible, C. M., Vince, S. R., Siddiki, S. N., & Calanni, J. C. (2014). Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011
  • Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2021). Policy learning, policy failure, and the mitigation of policy risks: Re-thinking the lessons of policy success and failure. Administration & Society.
  • Levesque, V. R., Calhoun, A. J., Bell, K. P., & Johnson, T. R. (2017). Turning contention into collaboration: Engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726
  • Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2017). Group-based emotion in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702725
  • Margerum, R. D., Zwickle, A., Bruce, J., & Thomas, C. (2022). The effects of enhanced information utilization in collaborative hazard mitigation planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1997352
  • Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
  • Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485
  • McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2018). Is learning without teaching possible? The productive tension between network governance and reflexivity. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.986568
  • Merriam, C. E. (2014). The significance of psychology for the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 18(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1944171
  • Meyer, R., & Kunreuther, H. (2017). The ostrich paradox: Why we underprepare for disasters. Wharton Digital Press.
  • Mezirow, J. (2006). An overview of transformative learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.), Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts (pp. 24–38). Routledge.
  • Montpetit, É., & Lachapelle, E. (2017). Policy learning, motivated scepticism, and the politics of shale gas development in British Columbia and Quebec. Policy and Society, 36(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1320846
  • Moyson, S. (2017). Cognition and policy change: The consistency of policy learning in the advocacy coalition framework. Policy and Society, 36(2), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1322259
  • Mukhtarov, F., Dieperink, C., Driessen, P., & Riley, J. (2019). Collaborative learning for policy innovations: sustainable urban drainage systems in Leicester, England. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1627864
  • Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2012). Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04476-170103
  • Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754
  • Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2017). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy & Politics, 45(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14788776017743
  • Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12209
  • Newig, J., Günther, D., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network: Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03713-150424
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  • Nowlin, M. C. (2021). Policy learning and information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 49(4), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12397
  • O’Donovan, K. (2017). Policy failure and policy learning: Examining the conditions of learning after disaster. Review of Policy Research, 34(4), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12239
  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
  • Pattison, A. (2018). Factors shaping policy learning: A study of policy actors in subnational climate and energy issues. Review of Policy Research, 35(4), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12303
  • Rachlinski, J. J., & Farina, C. R. (2002). Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 755. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/755.
  • Ricco, G., & Schultz, C. A. (2019). Organizational learning during policy implementation: Lessons from US forest planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623659
  • Riche, C., Aubin, D., & Moyson, S. (2021). Too much of a good thing? A systematic review about the conditions of learning in governance networks. European Policy Analysis, 7(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1080
  • Rietig, K., & Perkins, R. (2018). Does learning matter for policy outcomes? The case of integrating climate finance into the EU budget. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1270345
  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
  • Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
  • Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., & Hathaway, P. L. (2011). Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Politics & Policy, 39(3), 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00295.x
  • Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12800
  • Siebenhüner, B. (2002). How do scientific assessments learn? Part 1. Conceptual framework and case study of the IPCC. Environmental Science & Policy, 5(5), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00050-3
  • Smith-Walter, A., Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., & Peterson, H. (2020). The stories groups tell: Campaign finance reform and the narrative networks of cultural cognition. Quality & Quantity, 54(2), 645–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00884-8
  • Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
  • Sotirov, M., & Winkel, G. (2016). Toward a cognitive theory of shifting coalitions and policy change: Linking the advocacy coalition framework and cultural theory. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9235-8
  • Strickland, A. A., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460524
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2006). The availability heuristic, intuitive cost-benefit analysis, and climate change. Climatic Change, 77(1), 195–210.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 38–43). Brooks/cole.
  • Tappin, B. M., Leer, L., & McKay, R. T. (2017). The heart trumps the head: Desirability bias in political belief revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1143.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
  • Vagionaki, T. (2018). Blocked learning in Greece: The case of soft-governance. In C. A. Dunlop, C. M. Radaelli, & P. Trein (Eds.), Learning in public policy (pp. 191–214). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Van Der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020). You are fake news: Political bias in perceptions of fake news. Media, Culture & Society, 42(3), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720906992
  • Vantaggiato, F. P. (2022). From learning to influence: The evolution of collaboration in European Administrative Networks. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(10), 1631–1655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2069843
  • Vulturius, G., & Gerger Swartling, Å. (2015). Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: Experiences with Swedish forestry stakeholders. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.1002218
  • Wagner, P. M., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2020). Can policy forums overcome echo chamber effects by enabling policy learning? Evidence from the Irish climate change policy network. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000314
  • Weible, C. M., & Heikkila, T. (2017). Policy conflict framework. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9280-6
  • West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2020). Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization. Political Behavior, 1–32.
  • Weyant, J. P. (1988). Is there policy-oriented learning in the analysis of natural gas policy issues? Policy Sciences, 21(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136409
  • Zaki, B., Wayenberg, E., & George, B. (2022). A systematic review of policy learning: Tiptoeing through a conceptual minefield. Policy Studies Yearbook, 12(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.