Firms, agency, and evolution

References

• AghionP., & HoldenR. (2011). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm: What have we learned over the past 25 years?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 181–197. doi:10.1257/jep.25.2.181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlchianA. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–221. doi:10.1086/256940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlexanderJ. (2007). The structural evolution of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BacharachM. (1999). Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation. Research in Economics, 53, 117–147. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0188.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J., & McKelvey, B. (Eds.). (1999). Variations in organizational science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• BoydR., & RichersonP. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BrandonR. (1990). Adaptation and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BussL. (1987). The evolution of individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CarleyK. (1996). A comparison of artificial and human organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 175–191. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00896-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkA. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• CoaseR. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
   Google Scholar
• DamuthJ., & HeislerI. L. (1988). Alternative formulations of multi-level selection. Biology and Philosophy, 3, 407–430. doi:10.1007/BF00647962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DayR., & ChenP. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DemsetzH. (1997). The firm in economic theory: A quiet revolution. The American Economic Review, 87, 426–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnkeS. (1951). On maximizing profits: A distinction between Chamberlin and Robinson. The American Economic Review, 41, 566–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FamaE. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307. doi:10.1086/260866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FossN., & KleinP. (2008). The theory of the firm and its critics: A stocktaking and an assessment. In E.Brousseau & J. -M.Glachant (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FrankJ. (2003). Natural selection, rational economic behavior, and alternative outcomes of the evolutionary process. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32, 601–622. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2003.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• FutuymaD. (2013). Evolution (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• GhiselinM. (1987). Bioeconomics and the metaphysics of selection. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 10, 361–369. doi:10.1016/0140-1750(87)90050-9.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• GindisD. (2009). From fictions and aggregates to real entities in the theory of the firm. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5, 25–46. doi:10.1017/S1744137408001203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey-SmithP. (2009). Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HartO. (2008). Economica coase lecture: Reference points and the theory of the firm. Economica, 75, 404–411. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00659.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HirshleiferJ. (1977). Economics from a biological viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(1), 1–52. doi:10.1086/466891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HodgsonG. (1999). Evolution and institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• HodgsonG. (2007). Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14, 211–226. doi:10.1080/13501780701394094.
   Google Scholar
• HodgsonG., & KnudsenT. (2010). Darwin's conjecture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• HullD. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• KleinB., CrawfordR., & AlchianA. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 297–326. doi:10.1086/466922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlepperS. (2009). Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. European Management Review, 6, 159–171. doi:10.1057/emr.2009.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnightF. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• KrepsD. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ListC., & PettitP. (2006). Group agency and supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, 85–105. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00032.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard SmithJ. (1987). How to model evolution. In J.Dupre (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 119–131). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard SmithJ., & SzethmaryE. (1995). The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MichodR. (1999). Darwinian dynamics: Evolutionary transitions in fitness and individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NelsonR., & WinterS. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• NickersonJ., & ZengerT. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm – the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15, 617–632. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkashaS. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PenroseE. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• PettitP. (2003). Groups with minds of their own. In F.Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing metaphysics: The nature of social reality (pp. 167–193). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• RadnerR. (1993). The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica, 61, 1109–1146. doi:10.2307/2951495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadnerR. (2000). Costly and bounded rationality in individual and team decision-making. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 623–658. doi:10.1093/icc/9.4.623.
   Google Scholar
• RadnerR. (2006). Neo-schumpeterian and other theories of the firm: A comment and personal retrospective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 373–380. doi:10.1093/icc/dtl006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichardsonG. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. The Economic Journal, 82, 883–896. doi:10.2307/2230256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenbergA. (1994). Does evolutionary theory give comfort or inspiration to economics? In P.Miroski (Ed.), Natural images in economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RoyallR. (1997). Statistical evidence – a likelihood paradigm. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• SatzD., & FerejohnJ. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 91, 71–87. doi:10.2307/2940928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalensee, R., & Willig, R. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of industrial organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• SchulzA. (2013). Beyond the hype: The value of evolutionary theorizing in economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43, 46–72. doi:10.1177/0048393112463336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchumpeterJ. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• SimonH. (1957). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• SoberE. (2000). Philosophy of biology (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• SoberE. (2008). Evidence and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SoberE., & WilsonD. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SterelnyK. (2001). Darwin's tangled bank. In The evolution of agency and other essays (pp. 152–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SterelnyK. (2012). The evolved apprentice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• SterelnyK., & GriffithsP. (1999). Sex and death. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• VeblenT. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12, 373–397. doi:10.2307/1882952.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2001). The human agent in evolutionary economics. In J.Laurent & J.Nightingale (Eds.), Darwinism and evolutionary economics (pp. 184–208). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2009). Advancing evolutionary explanations in economics: The limited usefulness of tinbergen's four-question classification. In H.Kincaid (Ed.), The oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 337–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WatkinsJ. (1952). Ideal types and historical explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, III, 22–43. doi:10.1093/bjps/III.9.22.
   Google Scholar
• WestS., El MoudenC. E., & GardnerA. (2011). Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 231–262. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsonO. (1971). The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. American Economic Review, 61, 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsonO. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233–261. doi:10.1086/466942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinterS. (1988). On coase, competence, and the corporation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4, 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• WittU. (1999). Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1, 19–34. doi:10.1023/A:1010054006102.
   Google Scholar
• WittU. (2003). The evolving economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• WitztumA. (2012). The firm, property rights and methodological individualism: Some lessons from J.S. Mill. Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 339–355. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2012.741796.
   Google Scholar