Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics

References

• Bacharach, M. (1993). Variable universe games. In K. Binmore, A. Kirman, & P. Tani (Eds.), Frontiers of game theory (pp. 254–275). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. (2006). Beyond individual choice: Teams and frames in game theory. (N. Gold & R. Sugden Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, J., & Bisin, A. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption–saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 460–492.10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). As-if behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas, 18, 133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2004). Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 94, 1558–1590.10.1257/0002828043052222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2007). Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. American Economic Review, 97, 464–470.10.1257/aer.97.2.464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond revealed preference: Choice- theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 51–104.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.-L., & Wakker, P. (2001). Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Science, 47, 1498–1514.10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121, 803–843.10.1086/673885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J. (2008). The brain as a hierarchical organization. American Economic Review, 98, 1312–1346.10.1257/aer.98.4.1312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (1991). Utility. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 1–12.10.1017/S0266267100000882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211–1254.10.2307/3312889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubitt, R., & Sugden, R. (2001). On money pumps. Games and Economic Behavior, 37, 121–160.10.1006/game.2000.0834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, D., & Levine, D. (2006). A dual-self model of impulse control. American Economic Review, 96, 1449–1476.10.1257/aer.96.5.1449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75–90.10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Max N. (2014). Nudging the UK: A conversation with David Halpern. The Psych Report. Retrieved January 5, from http://thepsychreport.com/conversations/nudging-the-uk-a-conversation-with-david-halpern/
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2012). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 123–136.10.1111/jopp.2010.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1996). Comment [on Plott (1996)]. In K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman, & C. Schmidt (Eds.), The rational foundations of economic behaviour (pp. 251–254). Basingstoke: Macmillan and International Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.10.1086/jpe.1990.98.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis. American Economic Review, 97, 477–481.10.1257/aer.97.2.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2008). Choices, situations, and happiness. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1821–1832.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Li, Z., & Wakker, P. (2014). If nudge cannot be applied: A litmus test of the readers’ stance on paternalism. Theory and Decision, 76, 297–315.10.1007/s11238-013-9375-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plott, C. (1996). Rational individual behaviour in markets and social choice processesL the discovered preference hypothesis. In K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman, & C. Schmidt (Eds.), The rational foundations of economic behaviour (pp. 225–250). Basingstoke: Macmillan and International Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. (2013). Incorporating limited rationality into economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 528–543.10.1257/jel.51.2.528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D., & van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 189–205.10.1006/obhd.1998.2803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008). (A, f): Choice with frames. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1287–1296.10.1111/roes.2008.75.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, L. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schkade, D., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340–346.10.1111/1467-9280.00066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2014). The ethics of nudging. Retrieved form, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2526341
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.10.2307/1600573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2004). The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review, 94, 1014–1033.10.1257/0002828042002714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2013). The behavioural economist and the social planner: To whom should behavioural welfare economics be addressed? Inquiry, 56, 519–538.10.1080/0020174X.2013.806139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P., & Evans, J. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., & Price, C. W. (2010). Do consumers switch to the best supplier? Oxford Economic Papers, 62, 647–668.10.1093/oep/gpq006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar