Back to Buchanan? Explorations of welfare and subjectivism in behavioral economics

References

• Bentham, J. (1814/1983). Mode of exercising the function of the practical moralist. In A. Goldworth (Ed.), Deontology together with a table of the springs of action and the article on utilitarianism (pp. 250–255). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N. (2014). The consistency and ecological rationality approaches to normative bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(4), 375–395.10.1080/1350178X.2014.969910
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). As-if behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas, 133–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Behavioral welfare economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7 (2–3), 267–319.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. (2016). The good, the bad, and the ugly: A unified approach to behavioral welfare economics. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 12–68.10.1017/bca.2016.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2007a). Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. American Economic Review, 464–470.10.1257/aer.97.2.464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2007b). Behavioral public economics: Welfare and policy analysis with nonstandard decision makers. In P. Diamond, & H. Vartiainen (Eds.), Behavioral economics and its applications (pp. 7–84). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2008). Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. In A. Caplin, & A. Schotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics (pp. 155–192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 51–104.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2008). How are preferences revealed? Journal of Public Economics, 92(8–9), 1787–1794.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2001). The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 298–319.10.1006/jeth.2000.2678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty – between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1979/1999). Natural and artifactual man. In The collected works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 1: The logical foundations of constitutional liberty (pp. 246–259). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1989/1999). The ethics of constitutional order. In: The collected works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 1: The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty (pp. 368–373). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1991/1999). The foundations of normative individualism. In The collected works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 1: The logical foundations of constitutional liberty (pp. 281–291). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (1991). The market as a creative process. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 167–186.10.1017/S0266267100001383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (2002). Constitutional implications of radical subjectivism. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 121–129.10.1023/A:1015754302238
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177.10.1257/aer.99.4.1145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2011). Individuals and identity in economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(3), 377–401.10.1628/0932456041960560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S. P. (2013). What is the meaning of behavioural economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 1–16. doi: 10.1093/cje/bes090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S. P. (2017). Behavioural public policy: The constitutional approach Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 252–265.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (2012). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (2016). On the econ within. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 26–32.10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., & Corbin, C. O. (2016). Capabilities and skills. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 342–359.10.1080/19452829.2016.1200541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrelmann, K. (1988/2009). Social structure and personality development: The individual as a productive processor of reality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016a). Preference purification and the inner rational agent: A critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 1–25.10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016b). ‘On the econ within’: A reply to Daniel Hausman. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 33–37.10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1922). Ethics and the economic interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 36(3), 454–481.10.2307/1886033
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-constitution – agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis. American Economic Review, 97, 477–481.10.1257/aer.97.2.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P., & Runde, J. (2007). Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 167–186.10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. In S. Lichtenstein, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp.1–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2010). Preference reversals and disparities between willingness to pay and willingness to accept in repeated markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 374–387.10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446.10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (2016). Bourgeois equality: How ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3), 291–330.10.1086/297848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Kumpulainen, K., Rainio, A. P., Hilppö, J., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Dealing with the contradiction of agency and control during dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 17–26.10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J. (2014). James M. Buchanan: Through an Austrian window. The Review of Austrian Economics, 27(2), 135–145.10.1007/s11138-014-0260-1
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J. (2017). Rationality – what? Misconceptions of neoclassical and behavioral economics  (March 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2927443.
   Google Scholar
• Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008). (A, f): Choice with frames. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1287–1296.10.1111/roes.2008.75.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnellenbach, J. (2016). A constitutional economics perspective on soft paternalism. Kyklos, 69(1), 135–156.10.1111/kykl.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. (2015a). Opportunity and preference learning. Economics and Philosophy, 31, 275–295.10.1017/S0266267115000139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. (2015). On the ethics of public nudging: Autonomy and agency. Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (No. 33-2015). University of Marburg: Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spong, H. (2011). Individuality and freedom: From aesthetic individualism to a modern approach. NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, 6, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131(1), 159–171.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2004). The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1014–1033.10.1257/0002828042002714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2006). Taking unconsidered preferences seriously. In S. Olsaretti (Ed.), Preferences and Well-Being (pp. 209–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511599743
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 19(3), 226–248.10.1007/s10602-008-9043-7
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2010). Opportunity as mutual advantage. Economics & Philosophy, 26(1), 47–68.10.1017/S0266267110000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2015). Looking for a psychology for the inner rational agent. Social Theory and Practice, 41(4), 579–598.10.5840/soctheorpract201541432
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2016). Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles? International Review of Economics, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400884711
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, K. I. (2014). Buchanan as subjectivist. Southern Economic Journal, 80(4), 918–925.10.4284/0038-4038-2013.308
   Google Scholar
• Von Humboldt, W. (1792/1960). Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen. In A. Flitner, & K. Giel (Eds.), Werke in fünf Bänden, Band 1. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, D. G., & Rizzo, M. J. (2015). The problematic welfare standards of behavioral paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 409–425.10.1007/s13164-015-0244-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar