What’s feminist about feminist economics?

References

• Backhouse, R. E. (1998). If mathematics is informal, then perhaps we should accept that economics must be informal too. The Economic Journal, 108(November), 1848–1858.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D. (2013). Feminist economics as a theory and method. In D. M. Figart, & T. L. Warnecke (Eds.), The Handbook of research on gender and economic life (pp. 18–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D. K., & Kuiper, E. (2003). Introduction: Sketching the contours of a feminist philosophy of economics. In D. K. Barker & E. Kuiper (Eds.), Towards a feminist philosophy of economics (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, B. R. (1987a). ‘Measurement’ or finding things out in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 18(2), (Spring), 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, B. R. (1987b). The task of a feminist economics: A more equitable future. In C. Farnham (Ed.), The impact of feminist research in the academy (pp. 131–147). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berik, G. (1997). The need for crossing the method boundaries in economics research. Feminist Economics, 3(2), 121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, G., & Duelli Klein, R. (Eds.). (1983). Theories of women’s studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Charusheela. (2013). Intersectionality. In D. M. Figart & T. L. Warnecke (Eds.), The Handbook of research on gender and economic life (pp. 32–42). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crasnow, S. (2007). Feminist anthropology and sociology: Issues for social science. In S. P. Turner & M. W. Risjord (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 755–789). Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. M. (1996). Redefining economics: From market allocation to social provisioning. In C. J. Whalen (Ed.), Political economy for the 21st century (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. (1995). Household responses to Stabilization and structural Adjustment: Male bias at the Micro level. In D. Elson (Ed.), Male bias in the development process (pp. 211–252). Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, M. A., & Nelson, J. A. (1993). Introduction: The social construction of economics and the social construction of gender. In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (pp. 1–22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/ Postmodernism (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grapard, U. (1999). Methodology. In J. Peterson, & M. Lewis (Eds.), The Elgar companion to feminist economics (pp. 544–554). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, W. D. (2001). Reflections without rules: Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1995). Can feminist thought make economics more objective? Feminist Economics, 1(1), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, B. E. (2012). The institutional barriers to heterodox pluralism. Review of Political Economy, 24(3), 489–501.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Cohen, R. L. (2010). Feminists really do count: The complexity of feminist methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, J. (1995). Introduction. In J. Humphries (Ed.), Gender and economics (pp. xiii–xxxix). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hundleby, C. (2012). Feminist empiricism. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 28–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. (2010). 25 years of feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Where are we now? Hypatia, 25(4), 778–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, J. P., & Newman, A. E. (1997). What data do economists use? The case of labor economics and industrial relations. Feminist Economics, 3(2), 127–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, K. (1998). Uncovering a quantitative economic history of gays and lesbians in the United States. Feminist Economics, 4(2), 61–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (1997). Poor women survey poor women: Feminist perspectives in survey research. Feminist Economics, 3(2), 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Leckenby, D. (2007). Feminist empiricism: Challenging gender bias and “setting the record straight. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp. 26–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1993). Economics for Whom? In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (pp. 158–168). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1992). Essential tensions – phase two: Feminist, philosophical, and social studies of science. In E. McMullin (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 198–216). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2005). The empirical challenges of feminist economics: The example of economic restructuring. In E. Kuiper, J. Sap, S. Feiner, N. Ott, & Z. Tzannatos (Eds.), Out of the margin: Feminist perspective on economics (pp. 127–143). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, A. M. (2002). The feminist challenge to economics. Challenge, 45(6), 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 117–139). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (1993). The study of choice or the study of provisioning? Gender and the definition of economics. In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (pp. 23–36). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (1996). Feminism, objectivity and economics. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2001). Economic methodology and feminist critiques. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2003). How did ‘the moral’ get split from ‘the economic’? In D. K. Barker & E. Kuiper (Eds.), Towards a feminist philosophy of economics (pp. 134–141). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), 707–731.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, S., & Krogman, N. T. (2012). A revolution reconsidered? Examining the practice of qualitative research in feminist scholarship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37(2), 493–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, W., & Turner, S. P. (2007). The SAGE handbook of social science methodology. London; CA, USA; New Delhi, India; Singapore: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, F. (2003). Foregrounding practices: Feminist philosophy of economics beyond Rhetoric and Realism. In D. K. Barker & E. Kuiper (Eds.), Towards a feminist philosophy of economics (pp. 105–121). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist economics. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2013). A social provisioning approach to gender and economic life. In D. M. Figart, & T. L. Warnecke (Eds.), The Handbook of research on gender and economic life (pp. 18–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pujol, M. (1997). Explorations - Introduction: Broadening economic data and methods. Feminist Economics, 3(2), 119–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2007). Comparative methods. In W. Outhwaite & S. P. Turner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social science methodology (pp. 67–81). London; CA, USA; New Delhi, India; Singapore: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1993). Neglected voices and excessive demands in feminist research. Qualitative Sociology, 16(1), 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K. (2012). Feminist philosophy of economics. In U. Maki (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science volume 13: Philosophy of economics (pp. 199–217). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2010). Quantitative methods and gender inequalities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. (2010). Postpositivism. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 702–703). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., & Zimmerman, M. K. (1989). Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology. The American Sociologist, 20(1), 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strassman, D. (1993). Not a Free market: The rhetoric of disciplinary authority in economics. In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic Man: Feminist theory and economics (pp. 54–68). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strassman, D. (1999). Feminist economics. In J. Peterson & M. Lewis (Eds.), The Elgar companion to feminist economics (pp. 360–372). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Strassmann, D. (1995). Creating a forum for feminist economic inquiry. Feminist Economics, 1(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Strassmann, D. (1997). Editorial: Expanding the methodological boundaries of economics. Feminist Economics, 3(2), vii–viii.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., & Varcoe, C. (1998). The tyranny of feminist methodology in women’s health research. Health Care for Women International, 19(6), 481–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, I. (1997). Focus groups: Contributing to a gender-aware methodology. Feminist Economics, 3(2), 131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, F. (2005). The citation impact of feminist economics. Feminist Economics, 11(3), 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2006). Gender equality as smart economics: A World Bank Group gender action plan - fiscal years 2007-10. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar