We're all behavioral economists now

References

• Angner, E. (2014). “To navigate safely in the vast sea of empirical facts”: Ontology and methodology in behavioral economics. Synthese, 192(11), 3557–3575. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0552-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angner, E. (2016a). A course in behavioral economics. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Angner, E. (2016b). Well-being and economics. In G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being (pp. 492–503). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angner, E., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). Behavioral economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 641–690). Amsterdam: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50022-1
   Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. (1999). Why experiment in economics? The Economic Journal, 109(453), F16–F24. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). New York, NY and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, B. (2013, July 31). Nudge, policy, and the endowment effect. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/07/nudge_policy_an.html
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1–33. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, T. (2017, October 9). Why conservatives should celebrate Thaler's Nobel. Bloomberg View. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-10-09/why-conservatives-shouldcelebrate-thaler-s-nobel
   Google Scholar
• Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C.-L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, N. (2017). The rise of behavioral economics: A quantitative assessment. Social Science History, 41(3), 555–583. doi:10.1017/ssh.2017.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Reflections on the 2017 Nobel Memorial Prize awarded to Richard Thaler. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 10(2), 61–75. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v10i2.307
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S. (2003). Pragmatism. In N. Bunnin & E. P. Tsui-James (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 774–789). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470996362.ch38
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (2012). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herfeld, C. (2018). Explaining patterns, not details: Reevaluating rational choice models in light of their explananda. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25(2), 179–209. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2018.1427882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. K. (2012). Is behavioral economics doomed? The ordinary versus the extraordinary. Cambridge: Open Book. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vjtfs
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., & Chater, N. (2017). Putting nudges in perspective. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 26–53. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.7
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, M. (1999). Dilemmas in economic theory: Persisting foundational problems of microeconomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Behavioral economics. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1094–1100). Oxford: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02247-6
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. (2002). A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review, 46(4–5), 657–685. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00207-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, J. (2017, July 11). How economics became a religion. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jul/11/how-economics-became-a-religion
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. (2012a). The economic agent: Not human, but important. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 691–735). Amsterdam: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50010-5
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. (2012b). Economic theory, anti-economics, and political ideology. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 241–285). Amsterdam: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50023-3
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Economics: An introductory analysis. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sent, E.-M. (2004). Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36(4), 735–760. doi:10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In T. J. Kastelein, S. K. Kuipers, W. A. Nijenhuis, & G. R.Wagenaar (Eds.), 25 years of economic theory: Retrospect and prospect (pp. 65–86). Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Starmer, C. (1999). Experimental economics: Hard science or wasteful tinkering? The Economic Journal, 109(453), F5–F15. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, C. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600. doi:10.1257/aer.106.7.1577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179. doi:10.1257/000282803321947001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar