When efficient market hypothesis meets Hayek on information: beyond a methodological reading

References

• Arena, R. (1999). Hayek et l’équilibre économique, une autre interpretation. Revue d’économie politique, 109(6), 847–856.
   Google Scholar
• Audier, S. (2012). Néolibéralisme(s). Paris: Grasset.
   Google Scholar
• Audier, S. (2013). Les paradigmes du Néolibéralisme. Cahiers philosophiques, 133(2), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Berdell, J., & Choi, J. W. (2018). Clashing analyses of speculation and the early regulation of US futures markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 40(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthonnet, I. (2014). De l’efficacité à la concurrence: Histoire d’une synthèse entre économie néoclassique et néolibéralisme (Doctoral dissertation, Lille 1).
   Google Scholar
• Birner, J. (2006). La place de Sensory Order dans l’œuvre de F.A.Hayek. Cahiers d’économie Politique / Papers in Political Economy, 51(2), 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, T. C., & Ganz-Morse, L. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. (2018). F.A. Hayek: Economics, political economy and social philosophy. London: Palgrave-Macmilan.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, P., & O’Donnell, K. (2013). The failed appropriation of F.A. Hayek by formalist economic. Critical Review, 25(3-4), 305–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, M. (2014). L’idée d’ordre spontané ou le monde selon Hayek. Archives de Philosophie, 77(4), 663–687.
   Google Scholar
• Brisset, N. (2018). Models as speech acts: The telling case of financial mode. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25(1), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J., & Vanberg, V. (1991). The market as a creative process. Philosophy and Economics, 7(2), 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgin, A. (2012). The great persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butos, W. (1985). Hayek and general equilibrium analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 52(2), 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butos, W. (1997). Hayek and rational expectations. In W. Keizer, B. Tieben, & R. van Zijp (Eds.), Austrian economics in debate (pp. 220–242). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., & Konings, M. (2017). Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (1984). Disentangling Hayek, Hutchison and Popper on the methodology of economics. Greensboro: University of North Carolina, Manuscrit.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (1988). Hayek transformation. History of Political Economy, 20(4), 513–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s challenge: An intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (2011). The Chicago school, Hayek, and neoliberalism. In R. Van Horn, P. Mirowski, & T. A. Stapleford (Eds.), Building Chicago economics: New perspectives on the history of America’s most powerful economics program (2011) (pp. 301–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caré, S. (2016). La dérive des continents néolibéraux : essai de typologie dynamique. Revue de philosophie économique, 7(1), 21–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cot, A., & Lallement, J. (2006). 1859–1959: de Walras à Debreu, un siècle d’équilibre général. Revue économique, 57(3), 377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, A. (1933). Can stock market forecasters forecasts. Econometrica, 1, 309–324.
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, A. (1944). Stock market forecasting. Econometrica, 12(3), 206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, A., & Jones, H. (1937). Some a posteriori probabilities in stock market action. Econometrica, 5, 289–294.
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2009). La nouvelle raison du monde. Paris: La découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Delcey, T. (2019). Samuelson vs Fama on the efficient market hypothesis: The point of view of expertise. Œconomia, 9(1), 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Delcey, T., & Sergi, F. (2019). The efficient market hypothesis and rational expectations. How did they meet and live (happily?) Ever after. ⟨hal-02187362⟩.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. (2009). The Cowles Commission and foundation on the functioning of financial markets from Irving Fisher and Alfred Cowles to Harry Markowitz and James Tobin. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, 20(1), 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R., & Veloce, W. (2010). Alfred Cowles and Robert Rhea on the predictability of stock prices. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 9, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Dostaler, G. (2001). Le libéralisme de Hayek. Paris: La découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2014). La grande bifurcation: en finir avec le néolibéralisme. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, K. (2002). Information, knowledge and the close of Friedrich Hayek system. Eastern Economic Journal, 28(3), 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. (1965b). Random walks in stock market prices. Selected papers of the Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago. Reprinted in the Financial Analysts Journal (September–October 1965), The Analysts Journal, London (1966), The Institutional Investor, 1968, October, 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. (1976a). Foundations of finance: Portfolio decisions and securities prices. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. (1976b). Efficient capital markets: Reply. The Journal of Finance, 31(1), 143–145.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1965a). The behavior of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., & Khurana, R. (2013). From social control to financial economics. Theory and Society, 42(2), 121–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., & Khurana, R. (2017). The social trajectory of a finance professor and the common sense of capital. History of Political Economy, 49(2), 347–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcarde-Gourinchas, M., & Babb, S. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). Information and competitive price system. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 246–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. In Individualism and economic order (pp. 33–56). Chicago: Chicago Univesity Press, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. In Individualism and economic order (pp. 77–91). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1946). The meaning of competition. In Individualism and economic order (pp. 92–106). Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1952). Sensory order. Chicago, IL: Chicago University press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1955). The counter-revolution of science. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1964). Competition as a discovery procedure. The Quaterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty, II. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty, III. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, J. (1973). Where are we in the theory of information? The American Economic Review, 63(2), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. (1988). The new classical macroeconomics. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. (1981). The politics and philosophy of economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, F. (2008). The construction of the canonical history of financial economics. History of Political Economy, 40(2), 213–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, F. (2009). Le modèle de marche aléatoire dans l'économie financière de 1863 à 1976. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences Humaines, 20(1), 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. (1953). The analysis of economic time-series-part I: Prices. Journal of the Statistical Royal Society. Serie A (General), 116(1), 11–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. (1988). The economic calculation debate: Lessons for Austrians. Review of Austrian Economics, 2(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D. B. (2018). Eugene F. Fama. Econ Journal Watch, 15(3), 365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konings, M. (2018). Capital and time: For a new critique of neoliberal reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173–208.
   Google Scholar
• Laidler, D. (1982). Monetarist Perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research Programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. (1986). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2007). Naturalizing the market on the road to revisionism: Bruce Caldwell’s Hayek’s challenge and the challenge of Hayek interpretation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(3), 351–372.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2009). Why there is no such Thing as economics of knowledge. In D. Ross & H. Kincaid (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., & Nik-Khah, E. (2017). The knowledge we have Lost in information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., & Plewhe, D. (2009). The road to Mont-Pélerin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mougeot, C. (2009). Théorie autrichienne du cycle et théorie des cycles d’équilibre. Revue française d’économie, 24(4), 67–92.
   Google Scholar
• Nik-Khah, E. (2011). Chicago neoliberalism and the genesis of the Milton Friedman Institute (2006–2009). In R. Van Horn, P. Mirowski, & T. Stapleford (Eds.), Building Chicago economics new perspectives on the history of America's most powerful economics program (pp. 368–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oguz, F. (2010). Hayek on tacit knowledge. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(2), 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. (1992). Economics – mathematical politics or science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sent, E. M. (1998). Sargent and the unbearable lightness of symmetry. Journal of Economic Methodology, 5(1), 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, R. (2009). Reinventing monopoly and the role of corporations: The roots of Chicago law and economics. In R. Van Horn & P. Mirowski (Eds.), The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 149–163). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, R. (2015). Hayek and the Chicago School. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A collaborative biography. archival insights into the evolution of economics (pp. 91–111). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, R., & Mirowski, P. (2009). The rise of the Chicago School of economics and the birth of neoliberalism. In R. Van Horn & P. Mirowski (Eds.), The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 149–163). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, R., Mirowski, P., & Stapleford, T. A. (Eds.). (2011). Building Chicago economics: New perspectives on the history of America's most powerful economics program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivès, X. (2008). Information and learning in markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivès, X. (2014). On the possibility of informationally efficient markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(5), 1200–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuillemey, G. (2013). Sur le statut épistémologique de l’hypothèse d’efficience des marchés. Revue de philosophie économique, 14(2), 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, C. (1996). Une histoire du concept d’efficience sur les marchés financiers. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 51(4), 873–905.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, C. (2013). Le modèle de marché au hasard en finance. Paris: Économica.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. R. (1983). On the existence of a competitive equilibrium: 1930-1954. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. R. (1985). General equilibrium analysis: Studies in appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Working, H. (1934). A random-difference series for use in the analysis of time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 29(185), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Working, H. (1935). Differential price behavior as a subject for commodity price analysis. Econometrica – Journal of the Econometric Society, 3(4), 416–427.
   Google Scholar
• Working, H. (1937). Futures trading and regulations: Discussion by Holbrook Working. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19(1), 309–312.
   Google Scholar
• Working, H. (1949). The investigation of economic expectations. The American Economic Review, 39(3), 150–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working, H. (1958). A theory of anticipatory prices. The American Economic Review, 48(2), 188–199.
   Google Scholar
• Zijp, R. (1990). Why Lucas is not Hayekian. Research Memorandum Series 33, Tinbergen Institute.
   Google Scholar