https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-8148
References
- Blaug, M. (1980). The methodology of economics, or how economists explain. Cambridge University Press.
- Bloor, D. (1978). Polyhedra and the abominations of leviticus. The British Journal for the History of Science, 11(3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708740004379X
- Boumans, M. (2018). Introduction to the symposium “curiosity, imagination, and surprise”. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 36B, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542018000036B001
- Boumans, M., & Leonelli, S. (2020). From dirty data to tidy facts: Clustering practices in plant phenomics and business cycle analysis. In S. Leonelli & N. Tempini (Eds.), Data journeys in the sciences (pp. 79–101). Springer.
- Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world. A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press.
- Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger. An analysis of the concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
- Hands, D. W. (2001). Reflections without rules. Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge University Press.
- Hausman, D. M. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press.
- Lakatos, I. (1976). In J. Worrall, & E. Zahar (Eds.), Proofs and refutations. The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press.
- Morgan, M. S. (2012). The world in the model. How economists work and think. Cambridge University Press.
- Popper, K. (1944). The poverty of historicism, I. Economica. New Series, 11(42), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549642
- Popper, K. (2002). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.
- Woody, A. I. (2014). Chemistry’s periodic law. Rethinking representation and explanation after the turn to practice. In L. Soler, S. Zwart, M. Lynch, & V. Israel-Jost (Eds.), Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science (pp. 123–150). Routledge.