Species adoption for sustainable forestry in Hong Kong’s degraded countryside

References

• Assembe-Mvondo S. 2009. Sustainable forest management practice in Central African States and customary law. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 16:217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, Rivera L, Marcano-Vega H. 2000. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 8:328–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby WC, Vogel WG. 1993. Tree planting on minelands in the Midwest: a handbook. Chicago (IL): Coal Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bawa KS, Dayanandan S. 1997. Socioeconomic factors and tropical deforestation. Nature. 386:562–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakesley D, Hardwick K, Elliott S. 2002. Research needs for restoring tropical forests in Southeast Asia for wildlife conservation: framework species selection and seed propagation. New For. 24:165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo JLC, Ferraz IDK, Imakawa AM. 2002. Rehabilitation of degraded areas of central Amazonia using direct sowing of forest tree seeds. Restor Ecol. 10:636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter FL, Nichols JD, Sandi E. 2004. Early growth of native and exotic trees planted on degraded tropical pasture. Forest Ecol Manage. 196:367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. 2012. Hong Kong annual digest of statistics. Hong Kong SAR Government, Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Chan GYS, Wong MH, Whitton BA. 1991. Effects of landfill gas on subtropical woody plants. Environ Manage. 15:411–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau KC, Marafa LM. 1999. Vegetation chronosequence in Hong Kong: soil properties and successional development. Singapore J Trop Geogr. 20:24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau L, Lau M, Hau B, Siu G. 2000. The present status and conservation of the biodiversity in Hong Kong. Chin Biodiversity. 8:25–35. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Chong SL. 1999. Restoration of degraded lands in Hong Kong. In: Wong MH, Wong JWC, Baker AJM, editors. Remediation and management of degraded lands. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; p. 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccarese L, Mattsson A, Pettenella D. 2012. Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New For. 43:543–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by birds in Hong Kong shrubland. Forktail. 13:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 1999. Environmental forestry in Hong Kong: 1871–1997. Forest Ecol Manage. 116:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 2010. Ecology and biodiversity. In: Jim CY, Li SM, Fung T, editors. A new geography of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books; p. 141–169.
   Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 2011. Seed dispersal in Hong Kong, China: past, present and possible futures. Integr Zool. 6:97–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett RT, Turner IM. 1997. Long-term survival in tropical forest remnants in Singapore and Hong Kong. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard Jr RO, editors. Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation fragmented communities. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press; p. 333–345.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ. 2008. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol Evol. 23:104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daehler CC. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 34:183–211.
   Google Scholar
• Dai L, Zhao W, Shao G, Lewis BJ, Yu D, Zhou L, Zhou W. 2013. The progress and challenges in sustainable forestry development in China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.775193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond J. 1987. Reflections on goals and on the relationship between theory and practice. In: Jordan III WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD, editors. Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Duan W, Ren H, Fu S, Wang J, Zhang J, Yang L, Huang C. 2010. Community comparison and determinant analysis of understory vegetation in six plantations in South China. Restor Ecol. 18:206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon D, Corlett RT. 2004. The ecology and biodiversity of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ezebilo E. 2011. Local participation in forest and biodiversity conservation in a Nigerian rain forest. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 18:42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Peng SL. 1997. Development of species diversity in the restoration process of establishing a tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China. Forest Ecol Manage. 99:185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley J, Gaddis EJB. 2007. Restoring natural capital: an ecological economics assessment. In: Aronson J, Milton SJ, Blignaut JN, editors. Restoring natural capital science, business, and practice. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Foley JA, DeFries R, Asnes GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309:570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. 2012. Global forest resources assessment 2010. Rome: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Koedam N. 2003. Distribution pattern of the flora in a peri-urban forest: an effect of the city-forest ecotone. Landsc Urban Plann. 65:169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goosem S, Tucker NIJ. 1995. Repairing the rainforest, theory and practice of rainforest re-establishment in North Queensland’s wet tropics. Queensland: Wet Tropics Management Authority; p. 72.
   Google Scholar
• Halle S, Fattorini M. 2004. Advances in restoration ecology: insights from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In: Temperton VM, Hobbes RJ, Nuttle T, Halle S, editors. Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 10–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hardwick K, Healey J, Elliott S, Garwood N, Anusarnsunthorn V. 1997. Understanding and assisting natural regeneration processes in degraded seasonal evergreen forests in northern Thailand. Forest Ecol Manage. 99:203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau BCH. 1999. The establishment and survival of native trees on degraded hillsides in Hong Kong [PhD Thesis]. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Hau BCH. 2000. Promoting native tree species in land rehabilitation in Hong Kong, China. In: Elliott S, Kerby J, Blakesley D, Hardwick K, Woods K, Anusarnsunthorn V, editors. Forest restoration for wildlife conservation. Thailand: International Tropical Timber Organization and the Forest Restoration Research Unit, Chiang Mai University; p. 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hau BCH, So KKY. 2003. Using native tree species to restore degraded hillsides in Hong Kong, China. In: Sim HC, Appanah S, Durst PB, editors. Bring back the forests: policies and practices for degraded lands and forests. Proceedings of an International Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Bangkok: FAO; p. 179–190.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann TM, Torri MC. 2009. Changing forest conservation and management paradigms: traditional ecological knowledge systems and sustainable forestry: perspectives from Chile and India. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 16:392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Herbarium and South China Botanical Garden. 2007. Flora of Hong Kong volume 1. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Herbarium and South China Botanical Garden. 2008. Flora of Hong Kong volume 2. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Herbarium and South China Botanical Garden. 2009. Flora of Hong Kong volume 3. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Herbarium and South China Botanical Garden. 2011. Flora of Hong Kong volume 4. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Herbarium. 2012. Check list of Hong Kong plants 2012. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Observatory. 2012. Climate of Hong Kong and introduction of climatological service; [cited 2013 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.hko.gov.hk/cis/intro_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hooper E, Condit R, Legender P. 2002. Responses of 20 native tree species to reforestation strategies for abandoned farmland in Panama. Ecol Appl. 12:1626–1641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston MA. 2004. Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers Distrib. 10:167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim CY. 1996. Roadside trees in urban Hong Kong: part II species composition. Arboric J. 20:279–298.
   Google Scholar
• Jim CY. 2010. The protected area system: nature conservation for a liveable and sustainable city. In: Jim CY, Li SM, Fung T, editors. A new geography of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books; p. 47–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jordano P. 2000. Fruits and frugivory. In: Fenner M, editor. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI Publication; p. 125–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T. 2007. Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science. 316:1866–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan R, Lamb D, Woldring O, Irvine T, Jensen R. 1997. Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in Northern Australia. Forest Ecol Manage. 99:117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent M, Coker P. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulmatiski A. 2006. Exotic plants establish persistent communities. Plant Ecol. 187:261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok HK, Corlett RT. 2000. The bird communities of a natural secondary forest and a Lophostemonb confertus plantation in Hong Kong, South China. Forest Ecol Manage. 130:227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CY. 2010. Weather and climate. In: Jim CY, Li SM, Fung T, editors. A new geography of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books; p. 7–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lay CC, Chan SKF, Chan YK. 1999. The utilization of native species in local afforestation programme. Hong Kong: Agriculture and Fisheries Department, HKSAR.
   Google Scholar
• Lee EWS, Hau BCH, Corlett RT. 2005. Natural regeneration in exotic tree plantations in Hong Kong, China. Forest Ecol Manage. 212:358–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EWS, Hau BCH, Corlett RT. 2008. Seed rain and natural regeneration in Lophostemon confertus plantations in Hong Kong, China. New For. 35:119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GPC, Hau BCH, Corlett RT. 2009. Exotic plant invasion in the highly degraded upland landscape of Hong Kong, China. Biodivers Conserv. 18:191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loik ME, Holl KD. 2001. Photosynthetic responses of tree seedlings in grass and under shrubs in early-successional tropical old fields, Costa Rica. Oecologia. 127:40–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang W, He J, Zhou J. 2013. Survival and development of Liaodong oak stump sprouts in the Huanglong mountains of China six years after three partial harvests. New For. 44:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Bai SL, Zhu Y, Li GL, Jiang P. 2012. Promoting seedling stress resistance through nursery techniques in China. New For. 43:639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugo AE. 1997. The apparent paradox of re-establishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. Forest Ecol Manage. 99:9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui MK. 1999. Vegetation development and performance on post-closure landfills [M.Phil. Thesis]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM. 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. J Ecol. 97:609–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Garza C, Howe HF. 2003. Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. J Appl Ecol. 40:423–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Garza C, Peña V, Ricker M, Campos A, Howe HF. 2005. Restoring tropical biodiversity: leaf traits predict growth and survival of late-successional trees in early-successional environments. Forest Ecol Manage. 217:365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiners SJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2002. Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field succession: community patterns and associations. Ecography. 25:215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson B. 1996. Tai Po Kau nature reserve, new territories, Hong Kong: a reafforestation history. Asian J Environ Manage. 4:103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard RB, Barnard P, Lavelle P. 2007. Assessing and restoring natural capital across scales: lessons from the millennium ecosystem assessment. In: Aronson J, Milton SJ, Blignaut JN, editors. Restoring natural capital science, business, and practice. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega YK, Pearson DE. 2005. Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invisibility and impact. Ecol Appl. 15:651–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen RB, Shaw R. 2010. Geomorphology. In: Jim CY, Li SM, Fung T, editors. A new geography of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books; p. 47–81.
   Google Scholar
• Pacala SW, Rees M. 1998. Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. Am Nat. 152:729–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrotta JA, Turnbull JW, Jones N. 1997. Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecol Manage. 99:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Bartha S. 2001. Implications from the Buell-Small succession study for vegetation restoration. Appl Veg Sci. 4:41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Department. 2012. Planning department annual report. Hong Kong : Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ren H, Li Z, Shen W, Yu Z, Peng S, Liao C, Ding M, Wu J. 2007. Changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function during the restoration of a tropical forest in south China. Sci China Ser C-Life Sci. 50:277–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarmiento L, Llambí LD, Escalona A, Marquez N. 2003. Vegetation patterns, regeneration rates and divergence in an old-field succession of the high tropical Andes. Plant Ecol. 166:63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So WY, Chu LM. 2010. Ant assemblages on rehabilitated tropical landfills. Biodivers Conserv. 19:3685–3697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe JP, Wood A, Meaton J. 2012. Competitive forests – making forests sustainable in south-west Ethiopia. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine MD, Whitmore TC. 1988. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio. 75:81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tognetti PM, Chaneton EJ, Omacini M, Trebino HJ, León RJC. 2010. Exotic vs. native plant dominance over 20 years of old-field succession on set-aside farmland in Argentina. Biol Conserv. 143:2494–2503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward Jr JH. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 301:236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chu LM. 2011. Plant community structure, soil properties and microbial characteristics in revegetated quarries. Ecol Eng. 37:1104–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chu LM. 2012. Early development of soil microbial communities on rehabilitated quarries. Restor Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00917.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhuang XY, Chu LM. 2013. Plant recruitment in early development stages on rehabilitated quarries in Hong Kong. Restor Ecol. 21:166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhuang XY, Huang YF, Lai ZT, Zou SM, He, HB. 2008. Growth of some native broad-leaved trees and plant diversity in the coniferous plantation of South China. For Res. 21:1–4. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhuang XY, Huang YF, Li HH, Lin YH, Luo TJ. 2003. The early growth of 11 native trees on banded cleaning-up sites. Guangxi For Sci. 32:77–80 Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou ZZ, Chokkalingam U. 2010. Lessons learned and success of initiatives to rehabilitated degraded forests in Guangdong Province, China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 17:263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang XY, Corlett RT. 1997. Forest and forest succession in Hong Kong, China. J Trop Ecol. 14:857–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang XY, Xing FW, Corlett RT. 1997. The tree flora of Hong Kong: distribution and conservation status. Mem H K Nat Hist Soc. 1:69–126.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang XY, Zhang H, Huang YF, Chen HY. 2004. Tree species selection and ecological forestry of Guangdong in 21st Century. Hong Kong: Guangzhou-Hong Kong-Macao-Taiwan Engineer) Forum; p. 79–88. Chinese.
   Google Scholar