Expectations and willingness-to-pay for ecotourism services in Hong Kong’s conservation areas

References

• Acott TG, LaTrobe HL, Howard SH. 1998. An evaluation of deep ecotourism and shallow ecotourism. J Sustain Tourism. 6:238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Adekunle MF, Agbaje BM. 2012. Public willingness to pay for ecosystem serice functions of a peri-urban forest near Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. J Dev Agric Econ. 4:45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Allcock A, Jones B, Lane S, Grant J. 1994. National ecotourism strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Tourism.
   Google Scholar
• Awaritefe O. 2004. Motivation and other considerations in tourist destination choice: a case study of Nigeria. Tourism Geogr. 6:303–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine JL, Eagles PF. 1994. Defining Canadian ecotourists. J Sustain Tourism. 2:210–214.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork P. 2000. Ecotourism from a conceptual perspective, an extended definition of a unique tourism form. Int J Tourism Res. 2:189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey RK. 1997. Ecotourism: a search for an operational definition. J Sustain Tourism. 5:109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bottrill CG, Pearce DG. 1995. Ecotourism: towards a key elements approach to operationalising the concept. J Sustain Tourism. 3:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker JM, Cordell HK, Johnson CY. 1999. User fees for recreation service on public lands: a national assessment. J Parks Recreation Adm. 17:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brau R, Scorcu AE, Vivi L. 2009. Assessing visitor satisfaction with tourism rejuvenation policies: the case of Rimini, Italy. J Environ Plann Manage. 52:25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley R. 1994. A framework for ecotourism. Ann Tourism Res. 21:661–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley R. 2011. Tourism and environment. Ann Rev Environ Resour. 36:397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley R. 2012. Sustainable tourism: research and reality. Ann Tourism Res. 39:528–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury J. 2008. New geographies of tourism in Peru: nature-based tourism and conservation in the Cordillera Huayhuash. Tourism Geogr. 10:312–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. 2007. 2006 Population by-census. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Chen WY, Jim CY. 2012. Contingent valuation of ecotourism development in country parks in the urban shadow. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO. 2013. Improving visitor management approaches for the changing preferences and behaviours of country park visitors in Hong Kong. Nat Resour Forum. DOI:10.1111/1477–8947.12025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO, Fok L. 2013a. Assessing the role of ecotourism training in changing participants’ pro-environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Asia Pac J Tourism Res. DOI:10.1080/10941665.2013.797003.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO, Fok L. 2013b. The motivations and environmental attitudes of nature-based visitors to protected areas in Hong Kong. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.832711.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO, Jim CY. 2006. Improving ecotourism practice to enhance protected area management in Hong Kong. In: Jim CY, Corlett RT, editors. Sustainable management of protected areas for future generations. Hong Kong: IUCN, WCPA, Gland, Switzerland and Cosmos Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO, Jim CY. 2013. Ecotourism service preference and management in Hong Kong. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:182–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow CWK. 2004. The potential for eco-tourism development in Hong Kong (Master thesis) [MSc thesis]. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton J, Benson A. 2006. Planning for sustainable ecotourism: the case for research ecotourism in developing country destinations. J Sustain Tourism. 14:238–254.
   Google Scholar
• Davis D, Tisdell C. 1998. Tourist levies and willingness-to-pay for a whale shark experience. Tourism Econ. 5:161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Düzgüneş E, Demirel Ö. 2013. Determining the tourism potential of the Altındere Valley National Park (Trabzon/Turkey) with respect to its conservation value. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:358–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagles PF. 1992. The travel motivations of Canadian ecotourists. J Travel Res. 31:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles PF. 2003. International trends of park tourism: the emerging role of finance. George Wright Forum. 20:26–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson LJ, Seidl AF, Loomis JB. 2011. Comparing tourists’ behaviour and values of land use changes: a focus on ranch land opean space in Colorado. J Environ Plann Manage. 54:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell D, Eagles PF. 1990. Ecotourism in Costa Rica: a conceptual framework. J Parks Recreation Res. 8:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell D, Smale B. 1992. Ecotourism and nature resource protection. Tourism Recreation Res. 17:21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell DA. 2001. A content analysis of ecotourism definitions. Curr Issues Tourism. 4:403–421.
   Google Scholar
• Gossling S. 1999. Ecotourism: a mean to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions? Ecol Econ. 29:303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung DB, Scholz RW. 2008. Community-based ecotourism in Bhutan: expert evaluation of stakeholder-based scenarios. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 15:397–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson TA. 2000. Population biology of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin in Hong Kong waters. Wildl Monogr. 144:1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006. Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 75:81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaffashi S, Shamsudin MN, Radam A, Rahim KA, Yacob MR. 2013. We are willing to pay to support wetland conservation: local users’ perspective. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerstetter DL, Hou JS, Lin CH. 2004. Profiling Taiwanese ecotourists using a behavioural approach. Tourism Manage. 25:491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretchaman J, Eagles PF. 1990. An analysis of the motives of ecotourists in comparison to the general Canadian population. Soc Leis. 13:499–508.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Behera MD, Tewari HR. 2010. Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using Geospatial tools. Trop Ecol. 51:75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew AA, Hall CM. 1998. The Asia-Pacific ecotourism industry: putting sustainable tourism into practice. In: Hall CM, Lew AA, editors. Sustainable tourism: a geographical perspective. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg K. 1991. Policies for maximizing nature tourism’s ecological and economic benefits. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lo AY, Jim CY. 2010. Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Gree. 9:113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar S, Deng J, Zhang Y, Pierskalla C. 2011. Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: a study in Savannah, Georgia. Urban For Urban Gree. 10:275–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeely JA. 1994. Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiver Conserv. 3:390–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore S, Carter B. 1993. Ecotourism in the 21st century. Tourism Manage. 14:123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Neto F. 2003. A new approach to sustainable tourism development: moving beyond environmental protection. Nat Resour Forum. 27:212–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okello MM, Ole Seno SK, Nthiga RW. 2009. Reconciling people’s livelihoods and environmental conservation in the rural landscapes in Kenya: opportunities and challenges in the Amboseli landscapes. Nat Resour Forum. 33:123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orams MB. 1995. Towards a more desirable form of ecotourism. Tourism Manage. 16:3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacio V, McCool SF. 1997. Identifying ecotourists in Belize through benefit segmentation: a preliminary analysis. J Sustain Tourism. 5:234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Park S-Y, Yoo S-H, Kwak S-J. 2012. The conservation value of the Shinan Tidal Flat in Korea: a contingent valuation study. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce DG, Wilson PM. 1995. Wildlife-viewing tourists in New Zealand. J Travel Res. 34:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pirselimoḡlu Z, Demirel Ö. 2012. A study if an ecologically based recreation and tourism planning approach: a case study on Trabzon Ҫalköy high plateau in Turkey. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:249–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priskin J. 2003. Issues and opportunities in planning and managing nature-based tourism in the Central Coastal region of Western Australia. Geogr Res. 41:270–286.
   Google Scholar
• Reiling SD, Cheng H, Trott C. 1992. Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees. Leis Sci. 20:208–217.
   Google Scholar
• Reynisdottir M, Song H, Agrusa J. 2008a. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: an Icelandic case study. Tourism Manage. 29:1076–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynisdottir M, Song H, Agrusa J. 2008b. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: an Icelandic case study. Tourism Manage. 29:1076–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh F, Karwacki J. 1996. Revisiting the ecotourist: the case of Grasslands National Park. J Sustain Tourism. 4:61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sivan A. 2002. Leisure participation of Hong Kong elderly: policy and practice. World Leis J. 44:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Spenceley A. 2008. Requirements for sustainable nature-based tourism in transfrontier conservation areas: a Southern African Delphi consultation. Tourism Geogr. 10:285–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao CH, Eagles PF, Smith SLJ. 2004. Profiling Taiwanese ecotourists using self-definition approach. J Sustain Tourism. 12:149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdell C, Wilson C. 2004. The public’s knowledge of and support for conservation of Australia’s tree kangaroos. Biodivers Conserv. 13:2339–2359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togridou A, Hovardas T, Pantis JD. 2006. Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the national marine park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecol Econ. 60:308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ. 2001. Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environ Conserv. 28:160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver DB, Lawton LJ. 2002. Overnight ecotourist market segmentation in the Gold Coast Hinterland of Australia. J Travel Res. 40:270–281.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver DB, Lawton LJ. 2007. Twenty years on: the state of contemporary ecotourism research. Tourism Manage. 28:1168–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Tisdell C. 2007. How knowledge affects payment to conserve an endangered bird. Contemp Econ Policy. 25:226–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright PA. 1996a. North American ecotourism markets: motivations, preferences, and destinations. J Travel Res. 35:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wright PA. 1996b. North American ecotourism markets: motivations, preferences, and destinations. J Travel Res. 35:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder S. 2000. Ecotourism and economic incentives: an empirical approach. Ecol Econ. 32:465–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzinger S. 2003. Are ecotourists really more ‘eco’? A comparison of general environmental behaviour, and knowledge between Swedish ecotourists and non-ecotourists. Lund: Lund Institute of Technology, School of Architecture, Department of Environmental Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzinger S, Johansson M. 2006. Environmental concern and knowledge of ecotourism among three groups of Swedish tourists. J Travel Res. 45:217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Seethal CEP. 2011. Tourism policy, biodiversity conservation and management: a case of the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 18:393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar