Indigenous community awareness and rights to forest in Kawang Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia

References

• Adhikari B, Di Falco S, Lovett JC. 2004. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecol Econ. [Internet]. 48:245–257. [cited 2013 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal B. 2009. Rule making in community forestry institutions: the difference women make. J Ecol Econ. [Internet]. 68:2296–2308. [cited 2013 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ajmal N. 2007. Kepentingan penggunaan tumbuhan liar sebagai sumber makanan oleh penduduk setempat di sekitar Hutan Simpan Kawang. In: Mohd. Abdullah AG, Maria L, editors. Panduan lapangan bergambar-Hutan Simpan Kawang. Tanah-Komuniti Hutan-Tumbuhan-Fungi-Burung-Serangga. Sekolah Perhutanan Tropika Antarabangsa: Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Malay.
   Google Scholar
• Alemagi D. 2010. A comparative assessment of community forest models in Cameroon and British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Pol. 27:928–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali T, Ahmad M, Shahbaz B, Suleri A. 2007. Impact of participatory forest management on financial assets of rural communities in Northwest Pakistan. J Ecol Econ. 63:588–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf TD, Das R, Bose A, Ray B, Chaudhuri KD, Brock S, Horwich RH. 2013. Motivations of the community forest protection forces of the Manas Biosphere Reserve in Assam, India. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:426–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminrad Z, Sharifah Zarina SZ, Abdul Samad H. 2011. Influence of age level of education on environment awareness and attitude: case study on Iranian students in Malaysian Universities. Soc Sci. 6:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Artine M. 2005. A study on Dusun community perception toward ecotourism development in Kinabalu National Park [dissertation]. Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi Mara.
   Google Scholar
• Atmis E, Gunsen HB, Lise BB, Lise W. 2009. Factors affecting forest cooperative’s participation in forestry in Turkey. J Forest Pol Econ. [Internet]. 11:102–108. [cited 2013 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birendra KC. 2012. Socio-economic study of community forests in the mid-hills region of Nepal [dissertation]. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Chang HH, Huang WC. 2006. Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Math Comput Model. [Internet]. 43:158–169. [cited 2013 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/mcm.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MSH, Koike M, Rana MP, Muhammed N. 2013. Community development through collaborative management of protected areas: evidence from Bangladesh with a case of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahal GR, Ojha H, Silpakar S. 2010. Community forestry networks and federations in Asia and their role in democratizing forest governance. Regional Workshop Strengthening CF Networks and Federations in Asia; 2010 Mar 25–29; Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Djamhuri TL. 2012. The effect of incentive structure to community participation in a social forestry program on state forest land in Blora district, Indonesia. J Forest Pol Econ. [Internet]. 25:10–18. [cited 2013 Jun 10]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson RG. 2004. Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. Eur J Oper Res. [Internet]. 152:631–640. [cited 2013 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis EA, Bolland LP. 2008. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighbouring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag. 256:1971–1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans K, Jong WD, Cronkleton P, Sheil D, Lynam T, Kusumanto T, Colfer CJP. 2009. Guide to participatory tools for forest communities. Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Chaudhury M, McCusker B. 2010. Do forests help rural households adapt to climate variability? Evidence from Southern Malawi. World Dev. 38:1241–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobeze T, Bekele M, Lemenih M, Kassa H. 2009. Participatory forest management and its impact on livelihoods and forest status: the case of Bonga forest in Ethiopia. Int Forestry Rev. 11:346–358.
   Google Scholar
• Haliza AB. 2010. Penglibatan masyarakat peribumi dalam isu berkaitan persekitaran: Tinjauan terhadap suku Mah Meri di Pulau Carey, Kuala Langat, Selangor. Humanity. 17:111–134. Malay.
   Google Scholar
• Hill T, Westbrook R. 1997. SWOT analysis: it’s time for product recall. Long Range Plann. 30:46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrel A. 1991. The politics of Amazonian deforestation. J Latin Am Stud. 23:198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Forsyth T. 2002. In the eyes of the state: negotiating a ‘rights-based approach’ to forest conservation in Thailand. World Dev. [Internet]. 30:1591–1605. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev.
   Google Scholar
• Jones S. 2007. Tigers, trees and tharu: an analysis of community forestry in the buffer zone of the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. J Geoforum. [Internet]. 38:558–575. [cited 2013 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor N. 2011. Role of mass media in promotion of environmental awareness along with skill development among the rural people of Shringverpur, Allahabad district, India. Paper presented at: International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environment Sciences (ICCEBS’2011); 2011 Dec; Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy A, Hanson A, editors. 1999. Summary report of the world commission on forests and sustainable development. Manitoba: WCFSD (World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development).
   Google Scholar
• Larson AM, Cronkleton P, Barry D, Pacheco P. 2008. Tenure rights and beyond: community access to forest resources in Latin America. Occasional Paper No. 50. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Lekshmi SPS, Annamalai R. 2010. Awareness of farmers about social forestry programme – an analysis. Indian Res J Ext Edu. 10:85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mojiol AR, Jitinu AMA, Adella A, Ganang GM, Nasly N. 2009. Vascular epiphytes diversity at Pusat Sejadi, Kawang Forest Reserve, Sabah Malaysia. J Sust Dev. 2:121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Moswete NN, Thapa B, Child B. 2012. Attitudes and opinions of local and national public sector stakeholders towards Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Botswana. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammed N, Chakma S, Masum MFH, Oesten G. 2011. A case study on the Garo ethnic people of the Sal (Shorea robusta) forests in Bangladesh. Int J Soc Forestry. 4:179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed N, Haque F, Koike M. 2009. The role of participatory social forestry in the enhancement of the socio-economic condition of the rural poor: a case study of Dhaka forest division in Bangladesh. Forests Tree Livelihood. 19:47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen G. 2012. Capacity development in protected area management. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norhara H, Ida SAS. 2009. Ecotourism and nature-based recreation. FRIM in Focus. ISSN 1394-5467.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit R, Bevilacqua E. 2011. Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. J Forest Pol Econ. [Internet]. 13:345–352. [cited 2013 May 4]. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com.
   Google Scholar
• Petheram L, Campbell BM. 2010. Listening to locals on payments for environmental services-conservation and development in Vietnam. J Environ Manag. 91:1139–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana MA, Toshikuni N, Muhammed N. 2007. Impact of participatory forest management (PFM) on socio-economic development in Bangladesh: a case study in the Madhupur Sal Forest. J Forest Econ. 53:46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rerkasem K, Yimyam N, Rerkasem B. 2009. Land use transformation in the mountainous mainland Southeast Asia region and the role of indigenous knowledge and skills in forest management. Forest Ecol Manag. 257:2035–2043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabah Forestry Department. 2013. Annual report 2012: social forestry (Chapter 21) [Internet]. [updated 2013 Oct 21; cited 2013 Nov]. Available from: http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Sam T, Shepherd G. 2011. Community forest management. Background paper for the United Nations Forum on Forest Secretariat UNFF9: ‘Forests for People, Livelihoods and Poverty Eradication’; Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC); United Nation, New York, Jan 27.
   Google Scholar
• Silva E. 1997. The politics of sustainable development: native forest policy in Chile, Venezuela, Costa Rica and Mexico. J Lat Am Stud. 29:457–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soud R, Talukdar S, Dey NK. 2013. Conservation challenges of Manas Tiger Reserve: political unrest and community attitude. Clarion. 2:59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson D, Pinter L, Bregha F, Volkery A, Jacob K. 2004. National strategies for sustainable development: challenges, approaches and innovations in strategic and co-ordinated action. Bonn: International Institute for Sustainable Development and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH; p. 71. ISBN: 1-895536-49-9.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. 2009. Abstract of human development reports. United Nations Development Programme [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jan]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/origins/.
   Google Scholar
• Vivian JM. 1991. Greening at the grassroots: people’s participation in sustainable development. Discussion Paper No. 22. Geneva: The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. Implementation completion and results report (IBRD-72070) on a loan in the amount of US$21.3 million to the United Mexican States for the second Community Forestry project: Latin America and Caribbean Region. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav NP, Dev OP, Springate-Baginski O, Soussan J. 2003. Forest management and utilization under community forestry. J Forest Livelihood. 3:37–50.
   Google Scholar