458
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A measure of sustainability of Brazilian agribusiness using directional distance functions and data envelopment analysis

, , , &
Pages 210-222 | Received 29 Oct 2013, Accepted 03 Mar 2014, Published online: 09 Apr 2014

References

  • Alcantara Filho JL, Fontes RMO. 2009. A formação da propriedade e a concentração de terras no Brasil. R. Heera. 4:63–85.
  • Ali ASM. 2013. Targeting the poorest in developing countries: components of multidimensional deprivation in Luxor, Egypt. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:504–511. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.842946
  • Alves BJR. 2010. Emissões de óxido nitroso de solos agrícolas e de manejo de dejetos [Internet]. Relatório de Referência. Brasília: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/userfiles/file/mudancasclimaticas/geesp/file/docs/publicacao/nacional/2_comunicacao_nacional/rr/agricultura/brasil_mcti_solos_agricolas.pdf
  • Azad MAS, Ancev T. 2010. Using ecological indices to measure economic and environmental performance of irrigated agriculture. Ecol Econ. 69:1731–1739. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.003
  • Bauler T. 2012. An analytical framework to discuss the usability of (environmental) indicators for policy. Ecol Indicators. 17:38–45. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.013
  • Bockstaller C, Girardin P. 2003. How to validate environmental indicators. Agri Sys. 76:639–653. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00053-7
  • Böhringer C, Jochem PEP. 2007. Measuring the immeasurable – a survey of sustainability indices. Ecol Econ. 63:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008
  • Bojacá CR, García SJ, Schrevens E. 2012. Investigating the technical sustainability of farming systems with correlational biplots. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:361–368. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.671194
  • Calker KJV, Berentsen PBM, Romero C, Giesen GWJ, Huirne RBM. 2006. Development and application of a multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems. Ecol Econ. 57:640–658. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.016
  • Camioto FDC, Mariano EB, Rebelatto DADN. 2014. Efficiency in Brazil’s industrial sectors in terms of energy and sustainable development. Env Sci Pol. 37:50–60. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.007
  • Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S. 1997. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manage. 51:229–240. doi:10.1006/jema.1997.0146
  • Claver E, López MD, Molina JF, Tarí JJ. 2007. Environmental management and firm performance: a case study. J Environ Manage. 84:606–619. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.012
  • Coggins JS, Swinton JR. 1996. The price of pollution: a dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances. J Environ Econ Manage. 30:58–72. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0005
  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. 2000. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and Dea-Solver software. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Costa AO, Oliveira LB, Lins MPE, Silva ACM, Araujo MSM, Pereira Jr. AO Jr, Rosa LP. 2013. Sustainability analysis of biodiesel production: a review on different resources in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 27:407–412. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.005
  • Cosyns H, Damme PV, Wulf RD. 2013. Who views what? Impact assessment through the eyes of farmers, development organization staff and researchers. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:287–301. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.806372
  • Elkington J. 1998. Cannibals with forks – the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization. 2006. Livestock’s long shadow environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 978-92-5-105571-7.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization. 2013. World food and agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 978-92-5-107396-4.
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S. 2000. Theory and application of directional distance functions. J. Prod Anal. 13:93–103. doi:10.1023/A:1007844628920
  • Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Yaisawarng S. 1993. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Statist. 75:374–380. doi:10.2307/2109448
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka C. 1986. Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Res. Energ. 8:167–184. doi:10.1016/0165-0572(86)90016-2
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Weber WL. 2006. Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture. Ecol Econ. 56:89–103. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.022
  • Farrell MJ. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R Stat Soc Ser A (General). 120:253–290. doi:10.2307/2343100
  • Fredericks SE. 2012. Justice in sustainability indicators and indexes. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:490–499. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.714807
  • Gomes EG. 2008. Uso de modelos DEA em agricultura: revisão da literatura. Engevista. 10:27–51.
  • Gomes EG, Lins MPE. 2008. Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. J Oper Res Soc. 59:616–623. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602384
  • Gomes EG, Mello JCCBSd, Souza GdSeS, Meza LA, Mangabeira JAdC 2009. Efficiency and sustainability assessment for a group of farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Annals of Operations Research.
  • Gómez-Limón JA, Riesgo L. 2009. Alternative approaches to the construction of a composite indicator of agricultural sustainability: an application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain. J Environ Manage. 90:3345–3362. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.023
  • González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó. 2008. Operations management practices linked to the adoption of ISO 14001: an empirical analysis of Spanish manufacturers. Int J Prod Econ. 113:60–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.051
  • Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A. 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod. 47:345–354. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014
  • Grossi MD. 2011. A questão agrária, a agricultura familiar e a probleza no Brasil [Internet]. In: Miranda C, Tiburcio B, editors. Pobreza Rural: concepções, determinantes e proposições para a construção de uma agenda de políticas públicas; Brasília; p. 79–82. [cited 2013 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.iicaforumdrs.org.br/iica2010/adm/adm/imagens/arquivos/Edicao%20Especial_Serie%20DRS_baixa%20resolucao.pdf.
  • Grosskopf S. 1986. The role of the reference technology in measuring productive efficiency. Econ J. 96:499–513. doi:10.2307/2233129
  • Hansmann R, Mieg HA, Frischknecht P. 2012. Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:451–459. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.696220
  • Heyder M, Theuvsen L. 2012. Determinants and effects of corporate social responsibility in German agribusiness: a PLS model. Agribusiness. 28:400–420. doi:10.1002/agr.21305
  • Hoffmann R, Ney MG. 2010. Estrutura fundiária e propriedade agrícola no Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da federação. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário.
  • IBGE. 2006. Censo Agropecuário [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Censos/Censo_Agropecuario_2006/Segunda_Apuracao/censoagro2006_2aapuracao.pdf.
  • Jabbour CJC, Silva EMd, Paiva EL, Santos FCA. 2012. Environmental management in Brazil: is it a completely competitive priority? J Clean Prod. 21:11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.003
  • Kjærsgaard J, Vestergaard N, Kerstens K. 2009. Ecological benchmarking to explore alternative fishing schemes to protect endangered species by substitution: the Danish Demersal Fishery in the North Sea. Environ Res Econ. 43:573–590. doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9251-7
  • Leal IC Jr, Garcia PAdA, D’Agosto MdA. 2012. A data envelopment analysis approach to choose transport modes based on eco-efficiency. Environ Dev Sust. 14:767–781. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9352-x
  • Lima MAd, Ligo MAV, Pessoa MCPY, Neves MC, Carvalho ECd. 2010. Emissão de gases de efeito estufa na queima de resíduos agrícolas [Internet]. Relatórios de Referência. Brasília: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/userfiles/file/mudancasclimaticas/geesp/file/docs/publicacao/nacional/2_comunicacao_nacional/rr/agricultura/brasil_mcti_queima_residuos_agricolas.pdf.
  • Lima MAd, Ligo MAV, Pessoa MCPY, Luiz AJB, Neves MC, Maia AH. 2010. Emissão do metano do cutivo de arroz [Internet]. Relatório de Referência. Brasília: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/userfiles/file/mudancasclimaticas/geesp/file/docs/publicacao/nacional/2_comunicacao_nacional/rr/agricultura/brasil_mcti_arroz.pdf.
  • Lima MAd, Pessoa MCPY, Neves MC, Carvalho ECd. 2010. Emissões de metano por fermentação entérica e manejo de dejetos de animais [Internet]. Brasília: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/userfiles/file/mudancasclimaticas/geesp/file/docs/publicacao/nacional/2_comunicacao_nacional/rr/agricultura/brasil_mcti_fermentacao_enterica.pdf.
  • Lyytimäki J, Tapio P, Varho V, Söderman T. 2013. The use, non-use and misuse of indicators in sustainability assessment and communication. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:385–393. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.834524
  • McKinsey & Company. 2009. Caminhos para uma economia de baixa emissão de carbono no Brasil [Internet]. São Paulo. [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://veja.abril.com.br/40anos/ambiente/pdf/relatorio-mckinsey.pdf.
  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens IIIWW. 1972. The limits to growth. New York (NY): Universe Books.
  • Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R. 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J Oper Manage. 25:998–1014. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.003
  • Munda G. 2005. “Measuring sustainability”: a multi-criterion framework. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 7:117–134. doi:10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0
  • Morse S, McNamara N, Acholo M, Okwoli B. 2001. Sustainability indicators: the problem of integration. Sust Dev. 9:1–15. doi:10.1002/sd.148
  • Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Beltrán-Esteve M, Gómez-Limón JA. 2012. Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. Eur J Oper Res. 220:798–809. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.025
  • Pittman RW. 1983. Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. Econ J. 93:883–891. doi:10.2307/2232753
  • Qiu H, Zhu W, Wang H, Cheng X. 2007. Analysis and design of agricultural sustainability indicators system. Agri Sci China. 6:475–486. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(07)60072-8
  • Reig-Martı́nez E, Picazo-Tadeo A, Hernández-Sancho F. 2001. The calculation of shadow prices for industrial wastes using distance functions: an analysis for Spanish ceramic pavements firms. Int J Prod Econ. 69:277–285. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00018-9
  • Scheel H. 2001. Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. Eur J Oper Res. 132:400–410. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
  • Seuring S, Gold S. 2013. Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. J Clean Prod. 56:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.033
  • Shephard RW. 1954. Cost and production functions. Nav Res Log Quart. 1:171.
  • Speelman EN, López-Ridaura S, Colomer NA, Astier M, Masera OR. 2007. Ten years of sustainability evaluation using the MESMIS framework: lessons learned from its application in 28 Latin American case studies. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 14:345–361. doi:10.1080/13504500709469735
  • Swinton JR. 1998. At what cost do we reduce pollution? Shadow prices of SO2 emissions. Energ J. 19:63–83. 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol19-No4-3
  • Tyteca D. 1996. On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms – a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. J Environ Manage. 46:281–308. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0022
  • WCED. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development – WCED.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.