843
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Social learning for sustainability: supporting sustainable business in Brazil regarding multiple social actors, relationships and interests

&
Pages 273-289 | Received 31 Oct 2013, Accepted 03 Mar 2014, Published online: 14 Apr 2014

References

  • Antonacopoulou E, Chiva R. 2007. The social complexity of organizational learning: the dynamics of learning and organizing. Manage Learn. 38:277–295. doi:10.1177/1350507607079029
  • Bandura A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Boje DM. 2001. Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. London: Sage.
  • Boje DM. 2008. Storytelling organizations. London: Sage.
  • Bouwen R, Taillieu T. 2004. Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 14:137–153. doi:10.1002/casp.777
  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • The Chemical Company. 2013 Mar 22. Programa de Adequaçãoe Educação Ambiental divulga balanço de 2012 [Internet]. [cited 2013 Oct 19]. Available from: http://www.basf.com.br/sac/web/brazil/pt_BR/imprensa/releases/20130322-R02
  • DeFillippi R, Ornstein S. 2003. Psychological perspectives underlying theories of organizational learning. In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA, editors. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell; p. 19–37.
  • Dessie Y, Wurzinger M, Hauser M. 2012. The role of social learning for soil conservation: the case of Amba Zuria land management, Ethiopia. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:258–267. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.636082
  • Elkjaer B. 2001. In search of a social learning theory. In: Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J, Araujo L, editors. Organizational learning and the learning organization: developments in theory and practice. London: Sage; p. 100–118.
  • Elkjaer B. 2003. Social learning theory: learning as participation in social process. In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA, editors. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell; p. 38–53.
  • Fiorino D. 2001. Environmental policy as learning: a new view of an old landscape. Public Adm Rev. 61:322–334. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00033
  • Foundation. 2011. Resumo das atividades [Internet]. [cited 2012 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.fundacaoespacoeco.com.br/sobre-a-fundacao/relatorio-de-atividades/relatorio2011/index.html
  • Friedmann J, Abonyi G. 1976. Social learning: a model for policy research. Environ Plann A. 8:927–940. doi:10.1068/a080927
  • Gardner GT, Stern PC. 1996. Environmental problems and human behaviour. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Glasser H. 2007. Minding the gap: the role of social learning in linking our stated desire for a more sustainable world to our everyday actions and policies. In: Wals AEJ, editor. Social learning: towards a sustainable world. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
  • Godoi CK, Freitas SF. 2008. Aprendizagem organizacional sob a perspectiva sociocognitiva: contribuições de Lewin, Bandura e Giddens [Organization learning under a socio-cognitive view: contributions from Lewin, Bandura and Giddens]. Rev Neg Blumenau. 13:40–55. (in Portuguese).
  • Goldstein H. 1981. Social learning and change: a cognitive approach to human services. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Hansmann R, Mieg HA, Frischknecht P. 2012. Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:451–459. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.696220
  • Harmonising Collaborative Planning [HarmoniCOP]. 2005. Learning together to manage together: improving participation in water management. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research.
  • Heclo H. 1974. Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: from relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Keen M, Brown V, Dyball R. 2005. Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. London: Earthscan.
  • Kilvington MJ. 2007. Social learning as framework for building capacity to work on complex environmental management problems [Internet]. [cited 2008 Dec 3]. Available from: http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/researchpubs/Social_learning_review.pdf
  • Kilvington MJ. 2010. Building capacity for social learning in environmental management [PhD thesis]. Canterbury: Lincoln University.
  • Leal MS. 1998. Gestão ambiental de recursos hídricos: princípios e aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais.
  • Lee KN. 1995. Deliberately seeking sustainability in the Columbia river basin. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS, editors. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosytems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 215–238.
  • Leeuwis C, Pybyrn R. 2002. Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management. Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum.
  • McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W. 1999. Fostering sustainable behaviour: an introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island: New Society.
  • Orderud GI, Vogt RD. 2013. Trans-disciplinarity required in understanding, predicting and dealing with water eutrophication. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:404–415. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.814605
  • Pahl-Wostl C. 2002. Towards sustainability in the water sector – the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci. 64:394–411. doi:10.1007/PL00012594
  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T. 2007. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc. 12:30. [Online].
  • Parson EA, Clark WC. 1995. Sustainable development as social learning: theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS, editors. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 428–460.
  • Peteraf M, Shanley M. 1997. Getting to know you: a theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Manage J. 18:165–186. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R
  • Povedaa CA, Lipsetta MG. 2014. An integrated approach for sustainability assessment: the Wa-Pa-Su project sustainability rating system. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 21:85–98. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.876677
  • Robinson J. 2003. Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures. 35:839–856. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00039-9
  • Rosenthal TL, Zimmerman BJ. 1978. Social learning and cognition. New York: Academic Press.
  • Silva JAA, Nobre AD, Manzatto CV, Joly CA, Rodrigues RR, Skorupa LA, Nobre CA, Ahrens S, May PH, Sá TDA, et al. 2011. O código florestal e a ciência: contribuições para o diálogo. Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência, Academia Brasileira de Ciências [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 5]. Available from: http://www.abc.org.br/IMG/pdf/doc-547.pdf
  • Swartling GÅ, Lundholm C, Plummer R, Armitage D. 2011. Social learning and sustainability: exploring critical issues in relation to environmental change and governance. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
  • Wals AFJ, Krasny M, Hart P. 2007. Social learning, sustainability and environmental education research. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education [Internet]; Virginia, US. [cited 2009 Oct 18]. Available from: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/8/6/9/0/pages186905/p186905-1.php
  • Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15:443–463. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E
  • Wegner E. 1999. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Wossen T, Berger T, Mequaninte T, Alamirew B. 2013. Social network effects on the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices in Ethiopia. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:477–483. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.856048

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.